Tumor suppression effect of ultrasound-sensitive nanoparticles with focused ultrasound in a pancreas cancer xenograft model.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the tumor suppression effect of an ultrasound-sensitive doxorubicin-loaded liposome-based nanoparticle, IMP301, to enhance the synergistic effect with focused ultrasound (FUS) in an animal model of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Thirty nude mice with xenografts of PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells were randomly and prospectively allocated to 6 different groups (5 per group) each for Study-1 (dose-response test) and Study-2 (synergistic effect test). Study-1 consisted of control, gemcitabine, Doxil with FUS, and three different doses of IMP301 (2, 4, 6 mg/kg) with FUS groups. Study-2 consisted of control, FUS only, gemcitabine, Doxil with FUS, and IMP301 (4 mg/kg) with or without FUS groups. Differences in tumor volume and growth rate were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test. RESULTS: In Study-1, 4 mg/kg or greater IMP301 with FUS groups showed lower tumor growth rates of 14 ± 4 mm3/day (mean ± standard deviation) or less, compared to the control, gemcitabine, and Doxil with FUS groups with rates exceeding 28 ± 5 (p < 0.050). The addition of FUS in Study-2 decreased the tumor growth rate in the IMP301-treated groups from 36 ± 17 to 9 ± 6, which was lower than the control, FUS only, gemcitabine, and Doxil with FUS groups (p < 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: IMP301 combined with FUS exhibited higher tumor growth suppression compared to the use of a conventional drug alone or the combination with FUS. The present study showed the potential of IMP301 to enhance the synergistic effect with FUS for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This article aims to evaluate the synergistic effect of FUS and ultrasound-responsive liposomal drug in tumor growth suppression by using xenograft mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. FUS-induced ultrasound-sensitive drug release may be a potential noninvasive repeatable treatment option for patients with locally advanced or unresectable pancreatic cancer. KEY POINTS: • Modification of conventional drugs combined with FUS would maximize tumor suppression. • IMP301 with FUS had higher tumor suppression effect compared to conventional chemotherapy. • This image-guided drug delivery would enhance therapeutic effects of systemic chemotherapy.

Synergistic Effects of Pulsed Focused Ultrasound and a Doxorubicin-Loaded Microparticle-Microbubble Complex in a Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mouse Model.

The synergistic effects of a doxorubicin (Dox)-loaded microparticle-microbubble complex (DMMC) and focused ultrasound (FUS) with a short duty cycle (5%) were evaluated in a pancreatic cancer xenograft model established by inoculating immunodeficient mice with CFPAC-1 cells. The efficacy of the DMMC with FUS (study 1), the effect of conjugating the particles as opposed to mixing them (study 2) and the levels of tumor apoptosis and intracellular Dox (study 3) were evaluated. The DMMC with FUS exhibited the lowest tumor growth rate (30.8 mm3/wk) and the highest intracellular Dox uptake (8.8%) and tumor cell apoptosis rate (58.7%) among all treatments. DMMC had a significantly lower growth rate than the mixture of Dox-loaded microparticles and microbubbles (44.2 mm3/wk, p < 0.01) when they were combined with FUS. In conclusion, DMMC with short-duty-cycle FUS holds promise for tumor growth suppression, which may be attributed to high intracellular Dox uptake.

In vivo study of enhanced chemotherapy combined with ultrasound image-guided focused ultrasound (USgFUS) treatment for pancreatic cancer in a xenograft mouse model.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether focused ultrasound (FUS) treatment with a higher mechanical index (MI) can enhance the effects of combined chemotherapy more than with a lower MI, and to evaluate the feasibility of the chemotherapy combined with FUS at a higher MI as an alternative treatment protocol. METHODS: Mice in the first study were divided into six groups: control, chemotherapy only (GEM), two groups treated with FUS only at two different MIs, and two groups treated with chemotherapy and FUS (GEM + FUS). Mice were treated with a single-session treatment; one session consisted of three weekly treatments and 1 week of follow-up monitoring. In the second study, mice were assigned to two groups (GEM, GEM + FUS) and treated with four treatment sessions. RESULTS: In the single-session treatment, tumor growth was most effectively suppressed in GEM + FUS group with a higher MI. Tumor growth rate was significantly lower in GEM + FUS group than in GEM group for multiple-session treatment. Specifically, three of ten mice in GEM + FUS group showed complete remission. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that FUS at a higher MI can enhance chemotherapy outcomes more than at a lower MI and demonstrated the potential of FUS in combination with chemotherapy as a new cancer treatment protocol. KEY POINTS: • Combined treatment of chemotherapy and focused ultrasound can effectively suppress tumor growth. • For the focused ultrasound treatment conditions used in this study, focused ultrasound with relatively higher mechanical index shows more enhanced therapeutic outcomes than with the lower mechanical index. • Combination therapy shows the possibility as a new cancer treatment protocol.