Fetal cardiac dysfunction in pregnancies affected by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A cohort study.

AIM: To analyze the presence of fetal myocardial dysfunction in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) at diagnosis. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 49 pregnant participants with ICP at diagnosis and 49 nonaffected controls from a single public hospital. ICP was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms after excluding other causes of pruritus and presence of autoimmune diseases. Total bile acids were not obtained in this cohort. ICP pregnancies were assessed with a functional echocardiography at diagnosis including PR-interval, isovolumetric contraction time (ICT), ejection time (ET), and isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT) for electrical, systolic, and diastolic function, respectively. Controls were assessed at recruitment. Perinatal outcomes were obtained from delivery books. The main outcome was the presence of PR-interval prolongation or first-degree fetal heart block, and echographic signs of diastolic and systolic dysfunction. RESULTS: Compared to controls, ICP were above upper limit in conjugated bilirubin (2.0% vs. 20.4%; p = 0.008), aspartate aminotransferase (2.0% vs. 24.5%; p = 0.002), and alanine aminotransferase (4.1% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.002). ICP was associated with a higher PR-interval (130 ± 12 ms vs. 121 ± 6 ms; p < 0.0001) with five first-degree fetal heart blocks. IRT was significantly higher in ICP (42 ± 6 ms vs. 37 ± 5 ms; p = 0.0001), with no differences in ICT and ET. PR-interval trend was only positively correlated with IRT in ICP pregnancies (p = 0.04 and p = 0.34, in ICP and controls, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that fetuses affected by maternal ICP are associated with electrical and diastolic myocardial dysfunction. More studies focused on antenatal and postnatal functional echocardiography are necessary to validate our results and consider these markers in the clinical management of ICP pregnancies.

Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Spanish Ophthalmology Journals.

PURPOSE: Properly conducted controlled clinical trials (CCTs) provide the highest level of evidence for optimising decision-making in healthcare. Electronic search strategies do not exhaustively retrieve them, because of issues related to indexing, exclusion of journals in languages other than English, among others. A handsearch approach is therefore warranted. We aimed to identify all CCTs published in Ophthalmology journals in Spain, to describe their main features, and to submit them to the Cochrane Register of CCTs (CENTRAL). METHODS: After identifying all Spanish Ophthalmology Journals, we conducted a systematic handsearch following Cochrane guidelines. When appropriate, results were compared against electronic searches. A descriptive analysis was completed, including risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: We identified 18 eligible journals; 10 074 original articles, editorials, letters to the editor, abstracts and conference proceedings were assessed via handsearching for inclusion. Of these, 136 were subject to title and abstract screening, after which 102 were classified as CCTs. We identified three articles via electronic searches that had not been detected via handsearch, for a total of 105 CCTs. Among these, the most investigated pathologies were cataracts (32/105; 30.5%) and glaucoma (23/105 21.9%). Regarding risk of bias, 104/105 (99.0%) were deemed as "high risk of bias", mainly due to flaws in sequence generation and allocation concealment. 15/105 (14.3%) mentioned conflicts of interest, half of which had something to declare. No CCT reported adherence to CONSORT. CONCLUSION: Spanish Ophthalmology journals publish a low number of CCTs, with limited methodological quality. Handsearching was more sensitive than the electronic searching. Abbreviations CCT: Controlled clinical trial.