Does bortezomib influence pre-transplant desensitization therapy or benefit post-heart transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients?

BACKGROUND: The use of bortezomib which is a proteasome inhibitor has been demonstrated to be efficacious in small number of patients as a desensitization strategy in heart transplant. We reviewed our single center's experience using Bortezomib along with plasmapheresis as desensitization therapy for highly sensitized patients to assess pre- and post-transplant outcomes. METHOD: We assessed 43 highly sensitized patients awaiting HTx (defined as cPRA > 50%) between 2010 and 2021 who underwent desensitization therapy with bortezomib. Only those patients who subsequently underwent HTx were included in this study. Enrolled patients received up to four doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 ) over 2 weeks in conjunction with plasmapheresis. The efficacy of PP/BTZ was assessed by comparing the calculated panel reactive antibodies to HLA class I or class II antigens. Post-transplant outcomes including overall survival and incidence of rejection were compared to those of non-sensitized patients (PRA < 10%, n = 649) from the same center. RESULTS: The average cPRA prior to PP/BTZ was 94.5%. Post-PP/BTZ there was no statistically significant decline in mean cPRA, class I cPRA, or class II cPRA, though the average percentage decrease in class I cPRA (8.7 ± 17.0%) was higher than the change in class II cPRA (4.4 ± 13.3%). Resulted were also replicated with C1q-binding antibodies showing more effect on I class compared to class II (15.0 ± 37.4% vs. 6.8 ± 33.6%) as well as with 1:8 dilutional assay (14.0 ± 23.0% vs. 9.1 ± 34.9%). Additionally, PP/BTZ treated patients and the control group of non-sensitized patients had similar overall 1 year survival (95.4 vs. 92.5%) but patients with PP/BTZ had increased incidence of AMR (79.1% vs. 97.1%, p = < .001), any treated rejection (62.8% vs. 86.7%, p = < .001) and de novo DSA development (81.4% vs. 92.5%, p = .007). Major side effects of PP/BTZ included thrombocytopenia (42%), infection requiring antibiotics (28%), and neuropathy (12%). CONCLUSION: The use of bortezomib in highly sensitized patients does not significantly lower circulating antibodies prior to heart transplantation. However, its use may improve the chances of obtaining an immuno-compatible donor heart and contribute to acceptable post-transplant outcomes.

Effects of Older Donor Age and Cold Ischemic Time on Long-Term Outcomes of Heart Transplantation.

Using older donor hearts in cardiac transplantation may lead to inferior outcomes: older donors have more comorbidities that reduce graft quality, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Shorter cold ischemic times might overcome the detrimental effect of older donor age. We examined the relationship between donor allograft age and cold ischemic time on the long-term outcomes of heart transplant recipients. rom 1994 through 2010, surgeons at our hospital performed 745 heart transplantations. We retrospectively classified these cases by donor ages of <50 years (younger) and ≥50 years (older), then by cold ischemic times of <120 min (short), 120 to 240 min (intermediate), and >240 min (long). Endpoints included recipient and graft survival, and freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, and rejection. For intermediate ischemic times, the 5-year recipient survival rate was lower when donors were older (70% vs 82.6%; P=0.02). This was also true for long ischemic times (69.8% vs 87.6%; P=0.09). For short ischemic times, we found no difference in 5-year recipient or graft survival rates (80% older vs 85.6% younger; P=0.79), in freedom from nonfatal major adverse cardiac events (83.3% vs 91.5%; P=0.46), or in freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (50% vs 70.6%; P=0.66). Rejection rates were mostly similar. Long-term graft survival in heart transplantation patients with older donor allografts may improve when cold ischemic times are shorter.

Characterizing Predictors and Severity of Vasoplegia Syndrome After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Vasoplegia is characterized as a severe vasodilatory shock after cardiac surgery, and can be associated with substantial morbidity. Increased systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, often related to prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass times, anesthesia, or mechanical circulatory support have been shown to be associated with the development of vasoplegia. We sought to identify risk factors and the impact of various degrees of vasoplegia after heart transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 244 consecutive patients who underwent heart transplantation over a 3-year period. Patients were divided into three groups: no vasoplegia, mild vasoplegia (requiring one vasopressor), and moderate/severe vasoplegia (more than two vasopressors). One-year survival, freedom from rejection, and postoperative complication rates were assessed. Risk factors for vasoplegia subgroups were retrospectively identified. RESULTS: Vasoplegia syndrome was observed in 34.3% of patients after heart transplantation (mild, 74.1%; moderate/severe, 25.9%). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly longer and pretransplant creatinine was significantly higher in the moderate/severe vasoplegia group. There was a strong trend toward greater use of mechanical circulatory support among moderate/severe vasoplegia patients compared with mild and no vasoplegia patients. After heart transplantation, 1-year survival, freedom from rejection, and need for hemodialysis were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoplegia syndrome is common after heart transplantation. Risk factors for increased severity include longer cardiopulmonary bypass times and elevated preoperative creatinine. Although higher rates of mortality or graft rejection were not detected, vasoplegia was associated with prolonged intubation, greater blood product usage, and lengthened hospital stay. Further studies involving larger cohorts are warranted.

Revealing a new mode of sensitization induced by mechanical circulatory support devices: Impact of anti-AT1 R antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 R) antibody have been shown to be associated with allograft rejection. This study aims to determine the rate of development of antibody to AT1 R after mechanical circulatory support device (MCS) implantation, and if the development of strong binding AT1 R antibodies is associated with survival. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients who had one MCS implantation were accessed based on serum availability. Mechanical circulatory support devices in this cohort included pneumatic bilateral paracorporeal ventricular assist device, continuous flow left ventricular assist device, and total artificial heart. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, seven patients had AT1 R antibodies ≥40 U/mL preimplantation. For 81 patients who had AT1 R antibodies <40 U/mL, the median value was 8 U/mL. Of these 81 patients, AT1 R antibody levels in 55 (68%) patients reached the saturated concentration (≥40 U/mL) postimplantation (P < .0001), with the highest percentage of patients with the saturated level of AT1 R antibody observed in the pneumatic bilateral paracorporeal ventricular assist device group. Compared to patients without the saturated level of AT1 R antibodies, patients with the saturated AT1 R antibody level had lower 18-month survival (P = .040). CONCLUSION: Mechanical circulatory support devices implantation significantly increases AT1 R antibody levels. The saturated level of AT1 R antibodies is associated with lower patient survival postimplantation.

Prolonged corrected QT interval in the donor heart: Is there a risk?

BACKGROUND: Assessing the QT interval in donors is important to exclude long QT syndrome as the cause of death. A donor heart with a corrected QT (QTc ) >500 milliseconds is often concerning. We sought to evaluate first year outcomes for donors with a QTc interval >500 milliseconds. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, we assessed 257 donor hearts for QTc interval >500 milliseconds. Post-transplant outcomes included 1-year survival, 1-year freedom from any-treated rejection, 1-year freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) defined as stenosis ≥30% by angiography, and 1-year freedom from nonfatal major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: Patients with QTc interval >500 milliseconds had a significantly lower 1-year freedom from CAV development. There were no significant differences for other outcomes. A significantly higher percentage of donors with QTc >500 milliseconds had a stroke or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Multivariate analysis found that donor QTc >500 milliseconds was associated with a 6.7-fold increased risk of developing CAV (P=.029, 95% CI 1.21-36.6) after adjusting for other known risk factors. CONCLUSION: QTc >500 milliseconds in the donor heart appears to be an independent risk factor for the development of early CAV after heart transplantation possibly due to a higher immunological risk.

Vasoplegia after heart transplantation: outcomes at 1 year.

OBJECTIVES: Vasoplegia syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition that can occur following cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart transplantation is a recognized risk factor for developing this vasodilatory state. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of vasoplegia syndrome on 1-year heart transplant outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of orthotopic heart transplants at a single institution between November 2010 and December 2014 was performed. Of the 347 consecutive adult patients, 107 patients (30.8%) met criteria for vasoplegia syndrome. Preoperative factors and intraoperative variables were collected and compared between vasoplegia and non-vasoplegia cohorts. The incidence of postoperative complications, transplant rejection and patient survival within 1 year were evaluated. RESULTS: Demographics and preoperative medication profiles were similar in both groups, while mechanical circulatory support device use was associated with vasoplegia syndrome (30.8% vs 20.0%; P = 0.039). Perioperative characteristics such as longer cardiopulmonary bypass [165.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 74) min vs 140.0 (IQR 42.7) min; P < 0.001] and increased blood product usage (24.7 ± 17.2 units vs 17.7 ± 14.3 units; P < 0.001) were associated with vasoplegia. Non-vasoplegia patients were more likely to be extubated [42.9 (IQR 37.3) h vs 66.8 (IQR 50.2) h; P < 0.001] and discharged earlier [10.0 (IQR 6) days vs 14.0 (IQR 11.5) days; P < 0.001]. One-year patient survival (92.0% vs 88.6%; P = 0.338) and any-treated rejection rates (82.7% vs 84.3%; P = 0.569) were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although vasoplegia syndrome was associated with an increase in perioperative morbidity, including greater mechanical ventilation time and hospital length of stay, no significant differences in survival or allograft rejection at 1 year was demonstrated.

Corticosteroid wean after heart transplantation-Is there a risk for antibody formation?

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid withdrawal after heart transplantation is limited to select immune-privileged patients but it is not known whether this predisposes patients to a higher risk for sensitization. METHODS: A total of 178 heart transplant recipients had panel-reactive antibody (PRA) measurements at transplant and every 6 months and were monitored for rejection with protocol endomyocardial biopsies. Corticosteroid withdrawal was initiated at 6 months post-transplant in select patients. RESULTS: Patients successfully weaned off prednisone (SPW; n=103) had lower PRA compared to those maintained on prednisone (MP; n=51) at pretransplant (34% vs 63%), 6 months (18% vs 49%), 12 months (19% vs 51%), and 18 months (15% vs 47%) after transplant (P<.05). Among 68 nonsensitized patients at transplant in the SPW group, seven (10%) developed de novo PRA at 12 months, compared to four of 19 (21%) of MP patients. Freedom from any treated rejection (97% vs 69% vs 67%), acute cellular rejection (100% vs 86% vs 71%), and antibody-mediated rejection (100% vs 88% vs 88%; all P≤.001) at 2 years was higher in SPW compared to MP and those who failed prednisone wean, respectively. CONCLUSION: Few patients successfully weaned off prednisone after heart transplant develop de novo circulating antibodies but are not at increased risk for developing rejection.

Intermediate outcomes with ex-vivo allograft perfusion for heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The Organ Care System, an ex-vivo heart perfusion platform, represents an alternative to the current standard of cold organ storage that sustains the donor heart in a near-physiologic state. It is unknown whether using the Organ Care System influences 2-year outcomes after heart transplantation. We reviewed our institutional experience to compare 2-year outcomes for patients randomized to the Organ Care System or standard cold storage. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, heart transplant candidates from a single tertiary-care medical center enrolled within the PROCEED II trial were randomized to either standard cold storage or the Organ Care System. Outcomes assessed included 2-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), non-fatal major cardiac events (NF-MACE), biopsy-proven cellular rejection (CMR) and biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized to the Organ Care System (n = 19) or cold storage group (n = 19). There was no significant difference in 2-year patient survival (Organ Care System: 72.2%; cold storage: 81.6%; p = 0.38). Similarly, there were no differences in freedom from CAV, NF-MACE, CMR or AMR. The Organ Care System group had significantly longer total ischemia time (361 ± 96 minutes vs 207 ± 50 minutes; p < 0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (134 ± 45 minutes vs 207 ± 50 minutes; p < 0.001) compared with the cold storage group. CONCLUSION: The Organ Care System did not appear to be associated with significant differences in intermediate results compared with conventional strategies. These results suggest that this ex-vivo allograft perfusion system is a promising and valid platform for donor heart transportation.