Phase III study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) plus leucovorin versus CAF for metastatic breast cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9140.

PURPOSE: To determine whether biochemical modulation with LV (leucovorin) enhances the efficacy of CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil) against metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with histologically confirmed stage IV breast cancer, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) performance status 0 to 2, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive CAF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1, and fluorouracil [FU] 200 mg/m2 intravenous bolus days 1 to 5) with or without LV (LV 200 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1 to 5 given 1 hour before FU). RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned to treatment; 124 patients had visceral crisis and 40 patients had a CALGB performance status score of 2. The median follow-up was 6 years. The two study arms were similar with regard to serious adverse events; four patients died from treatment-related causes, two patients on each study arm. Predictive variables for time to treatment failure and survival were visceral disease and performance status. The overall response rate was 29% for CAF versus 28% for CAF plus LV. The median time to treatment failure (9 months) and median survival (1.7 years) did not differ by treatment arm. CONCLUSION: Modulation of CAF with LV improved neither response rates nor survival among women with metastatic breast cancer, compared with CAF alone. Multivariate analyses confirmed the prognostic importance of performance status and visceral crisis. However, the overall and complete response rates, response durations, time to treatment failure, and survival were the same in the two treatment arms.

Mitoxantrone in patients with prostate specific antigen progression after local therapy for prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance are present in prostate carcinoma, some of which increase after androgen ablation (AA) therapy. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that chemotherapy in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression after local therapy, before androgen ablation therapy, will have greater antitumor activity. METHODS: Twenty-three hormone-naive patients with PSA progression after prostatectomy or radiation therapy were registered in this study. Twenty-two were treated with 10 mg/m(2) of mitoxantrone initially, followed by 12 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles. Prostatectomy specimens were assessed, when possible, for topoisomerase II alpha, multidrug resistance protein MRP, and bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received a total of 131 cycles of therapy. Three patients had transient Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia without fever. During treatment, 10 of 22 patients showed a decrease in PSA, without an associated decrease in testosterone. In this group of 10 patients, the mean PSA decrease was 29% at 3 months and 43% at 6 months. Overall, 4 of 22 patients had a decrease in PSA of greater than or equal to 50%. The PSA decreased in three of seven patients whose cancer overexpressed MRP and in three of seven patients who overexpressed bcl-2. No patient with overexpression of topoisomerase II alpha (n = 4) had a decrease in PSA during the study. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported study of mitoxantrone in patients with hormone-naive prostate carcinoma and PSA progression after local therapy; mitoxantrone was safe and biochemically active, similar to prior studies in hormone refractory prostate carcinoma, suggesting that critical molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance are present independent of AA. Further studies are warranted to determine whether pharmacogenomic assessment of topoisomerase II, MRP, or bcl-2 may predict for response to mitoxantrone.

Combined etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma: an intergroup trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with thymic tumors (thymoma and thymic carcinoma) are known to respond to a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, including single-agent ifosfamide and cisplatin with etoposide. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the response rate, progression free survival, overall survival, and toxicity of combined etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) in patients with advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma. METHODS: From July 1995 through February 1997, 34 patients with advanced thymoma or thymic carcinoma were entered on trial to receive etoposide (75 mg/m2 on Days 1-4) ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2 on Days 1-4), and cisplatin (20 mg/m2 on Days 1-4). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for four total cycles. RESULTS: Among 28 evaluable patients (pathology review excluded 6 patients), there were no complete responses and 9 partial responses (complete and partial responses combined, 32%; 95% confidence interval, 16-52%). The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 12.8-52.3 months), the median duration of response was 11.9 months (range, < 1-26 months), and the median overall survival was 31.6 months. Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 89% and 70%, respectively. The toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: The VIP regimen has moderate activity in patients with advanced thymic malignancies. However, with limited follow-up, the results of this trial appear to be inferior to other chemotherapy regimens reported in large Phase II trials performed in patients with this disease.

The use of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) continue to pose a significant therapeutic challenge. This report defines the toxicities, efficacy, and prognostic factors associated with the combination of carboplatin (CBDCA), paclitaxel, and once-daily radiation for patients with locally advanced disease. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were investigated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1993-1998, 62 patients with Stage III-IV SCCHN were treated with 70.2 Gy of RT at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day to the primary site. Weekly chemotherapy was given during RT consisting of paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/wk) and CBDCA (100 mg/m(2)/wk). All patients presented with locally advanced disease; 77% had T4 disease and 21% had T3 disease. Fifty-eight percent had N2b-N3 disease. RESULTS: Sixty patients were evaluable for response and survival with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 7-70). Ninety-eight percent of patients completed prescribed therapy. One patient died after refusing medical management for pseudomembranous colitis and is scored as a Grade 5 toxicity. Two patients suffered Grade 4 leukopenia. Median number of break days was two. A clinical complete response (CR) at the primary site was obtained in 82%, with a total (primary site and neck) CR rate of 75%. The median survival for the entire cohort is 33 months. Response to therapy and status of the neck at presentation were the only prognostic factors found to influence survival. The median survival for patients who attained a CR is 49 months versus 9 months in those who did not attain a CR (p < 0.0001). The 2- and 3-year overall survival for complete responders are 79% and 61%. Plasma paclitaxel concentrations in the range shown to be radiosensitizing were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel given concurrently with definitive once-daily external beam radiation therapy is well tolerated with over 90% of patients completing prescribed therapy. An ultimate CR rate of greater than 70% was obtained, which translated directly into improved survival. With 48% 3-year overall survival for the entire group, this regimen is an excellent option for this group of patients with a historically poor prognosis.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the activity and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with measurable stage IV carcinoma of the urothelium were enrolled onto this trial. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously for 30 to 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Cisplatin was administered after gemcitabine on day 1 of each cycle. The first 11 patients received an initial cisplatin dose of 100 mg/m(2). Due to the hematologic toxicity observed in several of these patients, the dose was reduced to 75 mg/m(2) in the remaining 35 patients. Patients were treated with six cycles, unless disease progression or severe toxicity necessitated earlier discontinuation. RESULTS: Ten of the 46 patients achieved a complete response and nine showed a partial response. The overall response rate was 41%. The median time to treatment failure was 5.5 months. The median survival was 14.3 months, and the 1-year survival probability was 54%. Most of the toxicities were hematologic and, in general, easily manageable. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active in the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and has an acceptable clinical safety profile. Studies are under way to further define the place of gemcitabine in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the incidence of brain metastasis in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Whether this treatment, when given to patients in complete remission, improves survival is not known. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether prophylactic cranial irradiation prolongs survival. METHODS: We analyzed individual data on 987 patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission who took part in seven trials that compared prophylactic cranial irradiation with no prophylactic cranial irradiation. The main end point was survival. RESULTS: The relative risk of death in the treatment group as compared with the control group was 0.84 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.97; P= 0.01), which corresponds to a 5.4 percent increase in the rate of survival at three years (15.3 percent in the control group vs. 20.7 percent in the treatment group). Prophylactic cranial irradiation also increased the rate of disease-free survival (relative risk of recurrence or death, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.86; P<0.001) and decreased the cumulative incidence of brain metastasis (relative risk, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.57; P<0.001). Larger doses of radiation led to greater decreases in the risk of brain metastasis, according to an analysis of four total doses (8 Gy, 24 to 25 Gy, 30 Gy, and 36 to 40 Gy) (P for trend=0.02), but the effect on survival did not differ significantly according to the dose. We also identified a trend (P=0.01) toward a decrease in the risk of brain metastasis with earlier administration of cranial irradiation after the initiation of induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic cranial irradiation improves both overall survival and disease-free survival among patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission.

Dose-response trial of megestrol acetate in advanced breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B phase III study 8741.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether dose escalation of megestrol acetate (MA) improves response rate and survival in comparison with standard doses of MA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer, positive and/or unknown estrogen and progesterone receptors, zero or one prior trial of hormonal therapy, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were prospectively randomized into three groups. The groups of patients received either MA 160 mg/d (one tablet per day), MA 800 mg/d (five tablets per day), or MA 1,600 mg/d (10 tablets per day). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced in the three treatment groups. Three hundred sixty-six patients received treatment and were included in the analyses. The response rates were 23%, 27%, and 27% for the 160-mg, 800-mg, and 1,600-mg arms, respectively. Response duration correlated inversely with dose. Median durations of response were 17 months, 14 months, and 8 months for the 160-mg, 800-mg, and 1,600-mg arms, respectively. No significant differences in the treatment arms were noted for time to disease progression or for survival; survival medians were 28 months (low dose), 24 months (mid dose) and 29 months (high dose). The most frequent and troublesome toxicity, weight gain, was dose-related, with approximately 20% of patients on the two higher-dose arms reporting weight gain of more than 20% of their prestudy weight, compared with only 2% in the 160-mg dose arm. CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 8 years, these results demonstrate no advantage for dose escalation of MA in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

High-dose paclitaxel plus G-CSF for malignant mesothelioma: CALGB phase II study 9234.

BACKGROUND: New agents with activity in mesothelioma are sorely needed. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) therefore performed a phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with malignant mesothelioma who had no prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients accrued to this multi-institutional phase II study of paclitaxel given as a 24-hour infusion at 250 mg/m2 every three weeks plus filgrastim (G-CSF) 300 mcg subcutaneously days 3-18. RESULTS: There were three (9%) regressions of evaluable disease. The median survival was five months (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.9-9.6 months), the one-year survival rate was 14% and the two-year survival rate was 6%. Toxicity was tolerable with one death from pneumonia (without neutropenia) on day 18 and a 23% rate of grade 4 granulocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The level of activity seen with paclitaxel is similar to that seen in other CALGB trials of the single agents carboplatin, trimetrexate and 5-azacytidine. Future studies of of paclitaxel (at lower doses) in combination with synergistic agents could be considered.

Overcoming bcl-2- and p53-mediated resistance in prostate cancer.

Most prostate cancers eventually develop resistance to hormonal therapy and chemotherapies. Many mechanisms for resistance to chemotherapy have been identified. Mutations or inactivation of the p53 suppressor gene and overexpression of bcl-2 are among such mechanisms. Mutations in the p53 gene can lead to resistance to certain chemotherapy agents, and such mutations are seen more often in metastatic than in primary prostate cancers. Thus, agents that are active in the setting of mutated p53 may have some advantage in prostate cancer. Overexpression of bcl-2 occurs frequently in prostate cancer and is associated with both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy resistance. In experimental systems, bcl-2 overexpression occurs after androgen deprivation and transfection of bcl-2 into sensitive cell lines makes them resistant to chemotherapy and hormonal therapies. Bcl-2 can be inactivated by phosphorylation as occurs with taxanes. The retinoids, as a class, can inhibit the growth of resistant cell lines that overexpress bcl-2, and the combination of interferon (IFN) and cis-retinoic acid (CRA) demonstrated increased antitumor activity. In our cell line model the combination of IFN and CRA greatly enhanced the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ). Based on these observations, we conducted a phase I/II trial of CRA and IFN-alpha in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Twenty-six percent achieved a decrease of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which was correlated to elevated serum transforming growth factor-beta. We then conducted a phase I trial of 13-CRA, IFN-alpha, and escalating doses of paclitaxel. Eighteen patients were treated with 1 mg/kg CRA and 1x10(6) unit IFN on days 1 to 4 and paclitaxel at doses from 100 to 175 mg/m2. Eleven patients received the 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose. Two patients in the phase I study achieved partial responses (one cervix and one prostate cancer). We subsequently initiated a phase II study of 13-CRA, IFN-alpha, and paclitaxel in hormone refractory prostate cancer. For entry patients must show progressive disease after androgen ablation. To test the mechanism of action, we are assaying peripheral blood monocytes and, when possible, tumor tissue for bcl-2 expression. As our understanding of the mechanisms of tumor resistance to chemotherapy improves, we will be able to design better approaches in treatment targeted to overcome the mechanisms of resistance.

Phase I trial, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations, of combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of paclitaxel with carboplatin with and without filgrastim support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to investigate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and carboplatin and correlate these with the pharmacodynamic effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were entered into this phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study. Paclitaxel was initially administered as a 24-hour infusion at a fixed dose of 135 mg/m2, and the carboplatin dose was escalated in cohorts of three patients, using Calvert's formula [dose(mg) = area under the concentration time curve (glomerular filtration rate + 25)], to target areas under the concentration time curve (AUCs) of 5, 7, 9, and 11 mg/mL x minute. A measured 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance was substituted for the glomerular filtration rate. Once the maximum-tolerated AUC (MTAUC) of carboplatin was reached, the paclitaxel dose was escalated to 175, 200, and 225 mg/m2. When the paclitaxel dose escalation began, the AUC of carboplatin was reduced to one level below the MTAUC. RESULTS: Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity. Thrombocytopenia was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 11 mg/mL x minute after course 2 and thereafter. End-of-infusion plasma paclitaxel concentrations and median duration of time above 0.05 microM were similar in course 1 versus course 2 at the 135 and 175 mg/m2 dose levels. The neutropenia experienced by patients was consistent with that observed in patients who had received paclitaxel alone. Measured carboplatin AUCs were approximately 12% (20% v 3% with course 1 v course 2, respectively) below the desired target, with a standard deviation of 34% at all dose levels. A sigmoid-maximum effect model describing the relationship between relative thrombocytopenia and measured free platinum exposure indicated that patients who received the combination of carboplatin with paclitaxel experienced less severe thrombocytopenia than would be expected from carboplatin alone. Of the 36 patients entered onto the study, one experienced a complete response and 17 had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 50%. The recommended doses of paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) and carboplatin for future phase II studies of this combination are (1) paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/mL x minute without filgrastim support; (2) paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 9 mg/mL x minute with filgrastim support; and (3) paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/mL x minute with filgrastim support. CONCLUSION: The regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin is well-tolerated and has promising activity in the treatment of NSCLC. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction between paclitaxel and carboplatin, but there is a pharmacodynamic, platelet-sparing effect on this dose-limiting toxicity of carboplatin.

Psychologic and neuropsychologic functioning of patients with limited small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy with or without warfarin: a study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: The current study assessed the psychologic and neuropsychologic functioning of patients with small-cell lung cancer who were randomized in a large clinical trial to receive intensive doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide (ACE)/cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide (PCE) chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) to the primary tumor and prophylactic whole-brain irradiation with (regimen I) or without (regimen II) warfarin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients' emotional states and cognitive functioning were assessed using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Trail Making B Test (Trails B), respectively. Two hundred ninety-five patients completed the POMS and Trails B at pretreatment, 224 patients after the completion of the ACE course of chemotherapy (week 9), and 177 patients after the completion of the PCE chemotherapy and RT (week 17). RESULTS: No differences on the POMS or Trails B measures were found between the two treatment arms as predicted, given that the only difference between the two treatment arms was the presence or absence of warfarin. Analysis of the POMS revealed that, overall, mean scores remained stable over the course of treatment; however, women showed a trend toward higher mean scores, which indicated a higher level of distress, compared with men at the pretreatment assessment. Examination of cognitive functioning, measured by the Trails B, revealed improved performance from baseline to post-ACE chemotherapy, which is consistent with a practice effect, but a significant worsening of Trails B scores post-RT compared with the pre-RT assessments, which is consistent with impaired cognitive functioning because of treatment (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Emotional state, measured by the POMS, did not differ between the groups or change significantly over time in this study of small-cell lung cancer patients treated with a combination of chemotherapy and RT plus or minus warfarin. However, the pattern of relatively stable POMS scores and poorer Trails B performance post-RT suggested that this combination of chemotherapy and RT had a negative impact on cognitive functioning.

Dihydro-5-azacytidine and cisplatin in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

BACKGROUND: In a prior Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Phase II trial of patients with advanced, previously untreated mesothelioma, dihydro-5-azacytidine (DHAC) demonstrated a 17% response rate, including 1 complete response, with only mild myelosuppression. This Phase II study (CALGB 9031) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of and toxicities that would result from adding cisplatin to DHAC administered to the same patient population. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were treated with concurrent DHAC at 1500 mg/m2/day for 5 days by continuous infusion and cisplatin 15 mg/m2 daily for 5 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Cisplatin was to be increased to 20 mg/m2 daily in subsequent cycles if toxicity was minimal. Therapy was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity mandated discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 5 objective responses were observed in 29 evaluated patients (objective response rate, 17%). The median duration of response was 6.6 months. Median survival was 6.4 months, with a median time to clinical failure of 2.7 months. The major toxicity noted was significant chest/pericardial pain, as was observed with DHAC alone. There were 2 early deaths of unknown cause on Days 9 and 17 of therapy, respectively. Significant leukopenia was observed in 29% of patients, but there were no neutropenic fevers. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cisplatin to DHAC did not increase the response rate over that observed with DHAC alone in patients with mesothelioma; however, it did increase toxicity, especially leukopenia. This combination is not recommended for further studies involving mesothelioma patients.

Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of second primary cancers has been reported in patients who survive small-cell carcinoma of the lung. The treatment's contribution to the development of second cancers is difficult to assess, in part because the number of long-term survivors seen at any one institution is small. We designed a multi-institution study to investigate the risk among survivors of developing second primary cancers other than small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Demographic, smoking, and treatment information were obtained from the medical records of 611 patients who had been cancer free for more than 2 years after therapy for histologically proven small-cell lung cancer, and person-years of follow-up were cumulated. Population-based rates of cancer incidence and mortality were used to estimate the expected number of cancers or deaths. The actuarial risk of second cancers was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Relative to the general population, the risk of all second cancers among these patients (mostly non-small-cell cancers of the lung) was increased 3.5-fold. Second lung cancer risk was increased 13-fold among those who received chest irradiation in comparison to a sevenfold increase among nonirradiated patients. It was higher in those who continued smoking, with evidence of an interaction between chest irradiation and continued smoking (relative risk = 21). Patients treated with various forms of combination chemotherapy had comparable increases in risk (9.4- to 13-fold, overall), except for a 19-fold risk increase among those treated with alkylating agents who continued smoking. IMPLICATIONS: Because of their substantially increased risk, survivors should stop smoking and may consider entering trials of secondary chemoprevention.

Randomized trial of chemotherapy and radiation therapy with or without warfarin for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

PURPOSE: Studies by the Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies Program and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) suggested that the addition of warfarin to chemotherapy might enhance response and/or survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This randomized study evaluated the effect of warfarin with chemotherapy and radiation therapy in limited-stage SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive warfarin or no warfarin. All patients received three cycles of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (ACE). Cycles 4 and 5 (cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide [PCE]) were given concurrently with radiation therapy. Three cycles of ACE were given after chemoradiation therapy, but were discontinued due to a high rate of pulmonary toxicity. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in response rates, survival, failure-free survival, disease-free survival, or patterns of relapse between the warfarin-treated and control groups. In patients treated according to the initial design, an increase in failure-free survival seen with warfarin treatment approached significance (P = .07). Preamendment results, while not significant, did not have superimposable treatment survival curves. A landmark analysis at 8 months showed a median survival time after the landmark for complete responders of 33 months with warfarin treatment compared with < or = 13.75 months for complete or partial responders not treated with warfarin (P = .05). Differences between the complete responders in this preamendment population were not significant (P = .103). CONCLUSION: Warfarin does not appear to improve outcome significantly in limited-stage SCLC. However, the differences in some variables between populations before the protocol amendment correspond to the favorable effects of anticoagulants observed in previous studies.

Paclitaxel in head and neck and other cancers: future prospects.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), a member of the taxanes, has been shown to have antitumor activity in a wide variety of cancers, such as breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Paclitaxel also has antitumor activity in certain previously relatively unresponsive tumors, such as lung, head and neck, esophageal, and bladder cancers. The optimal dose for each tumor has not been well defined. While 3-hour infusion appears to be the most convenient, studies of both longer and shorter infusions are in progress. Any incremental benefit of higher dose or longer schedule will need to be evaluated on the basis of the higher costs and toxicities. The results of many initial studies using combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel have generated considerable enthusiasm, but careful comparison studies and evaluation of toxicities are needed. Additional roles of paclitaxel include its ability to act synergistically with radiotherapy, and thus possibly help improve the local control of tumors, such as head and neck, esophageal, bladder, and lung cancers. Studies testing the role of the taxanes in neoadjuvant therapy before radiotherapy or surgery are just beginning. Paclitaxel is thus one of the very important new agents in the treatment of cancer, and further work is needed to define its optimal use.

A pilot trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Combined chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone for stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and concurrent use of both offers the advantage of synergistic interactions. Our prior trial demonstrated the ease and convenience of administering carboplatin during radiotherapy. Since paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and can act synergistically with both radiotherapy and platinum drugs, we initially added paclitaxel at 45 mg/m2/wk to carboplatin given at 100 mg/m2 during radiotherapy given at conventional fractions. The initial dose of paclitaxel was subsequently reduced to 40 mg/m2/wk. Thirteen of 18 patients entered so far have sufficient follow-up data; 12 are assessable for toxicity and 11 are assessable for response. One died early of progressive disease, two achieved a complete response, six achieved a partial response, and two had stable disease. Toxicities have so far been manageable for the 76 weekly doses administered. Chemotherapy dose reduction was needed in 10 patients. For the planned 100 doses of chemotherapy, 53 (53%) were administered as planned, 23 (23%) were reduced, and 24 (24%) were withheld due to neutropenia or mucositis. There were no toxic deaths, and no patient stopped therapy for toxicity. Paclitaxel/carboplatin can be administered during radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with acceptable toxicities, and further accrual is needed to evaluate the effect of this combination.

Effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid and alpha-interferon on transforming growth factor beta1 in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen.

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that 13-cis-retinoic acid (CRA) and alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha) have antitumor activity in patients with early recurrence of prostate cancer measured by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after local therapy, and that this activity is associated with the increase of plasma transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1). Thirty patients with a PSA > 7 ng/ml that increased >0.4 ng/ml/month after initial radiation therapy or a PSA > 2.0 ng/ml after prostatectomy were treated with 1 mg/kg/day of CRA and 3 million units of IFN-alpha administered three times per week. Patients were followed clinically with serum measurements of PSA and assessment of toxicity. Biological activity of CRA and IFN-alpha was assessed by the measurement of plasma TGF-beta1. Twenty-six percent of patients had a partial (50% decrease maintained for 1 month) or minimal (<50% decrease maintained for 1 month) biochemical response of PSA, with a median decrease of 23% (11-55%) at 3 months. Plasma TGF-beta1 levels increased with CRA and IFN-alpha therapy and correlated with a decrease in PSA; patients with a decrease in PSA had a 151% increase in TGF-beta1 compared to 27% in patients without a decrease in PSA (P = 0.04). CRA and IFN-alpha can produce transient reduction or stabilization of PSA. The measurement of plasma TGF-beta1 at 1 month of therapy correlates with changes in PSA and may represent a useful marker for the biological effect of these agents; further analysis in larger numbers of patients and methods to optimize these effects should be explored.

Chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: paclitaxel/carboplatin/radiotherapy in regionally advanced disease.

Based on superior results observed with combined-modality therapy over radiotherapy alone and on the authors' previous work with carboplatin and standard daily thoracic radiotherapy in patients with advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, a phase II study was designed to incorporate radiosensitizing doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) into the carboplatin/radiotherapy regimen, to improve the therapeutic index and define the toxicities. Thirty-two patients have been entered. Paclitaxel 45 mg/m2/wk was administered over 3 hours prior to carboplatin (100 mg/m2/wk) and thoracic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d 5 days a week; total dose, 60 to 65 Gy). No grade 4 toxicities occurred. Seven patients had chemotherapy doses delayed because of grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 3 mucositis/esophagitis that required hospitalization. Median survival has not yet been reached, and all patients are being followed. These preliminary data demonstrate the feasibility of combined concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with acceptable toxicities. Further investigation is needed to optimize carboplatin dosage with adaptive control using formulas based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Full-dose induction chemotherapy regimens to maximize the systemic effects of chemotherapy should precede concurrent chemoradiotherapy in future studies.