ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trans Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become the primary treatment for aortic stenosis in patients over 75 years old. Despite its clinical efficacy, it's adoption in emerging countries remains low due to the high cost of prostheses and limited healthcare funding resources. This leads to prolonged waiting times for the TAVI procedure, which may lead to complications; these data are missing particularly in emerging countries. AIMS: To describe waiting time for TAVI and mortality rate in this waiting period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was prospective registry, patients referred for TAVI were prospectively followed; waiting time was calculated from the first visit after referral to TAVI implantation, clinical and, call fellow up was performed every 3 months. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (G1) patients still awaiting TAVI (105 patients), and those who underwent TAVI (36 patients). Group 2 (G2) patients who died while awaiting TAVI (16 patients, 10,2 %). RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar, with a tendency for older age in G2 (79.5 ± 5.7 years vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 years, p=0,06). G2 exhibited more left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment (8.5% vs. 25%, p=0,03) and a higher rate of severe heart failure with dyspnea stages III or IV (2.8% vs. 12.5%, p<0,001). The mean follow-up in G1 was 242.9 ± 137.4 days; the waiting time for TAVI was 231.7 ± 134.1 days, and the average time between the first consultation and death while awaiting TAVI (G2) was 335.1 ± 167.4 days. CONCLUSION: in our series, waiting time is high due to limited Trans aortic heart valve availability, mortality during this wait exceeds 10%. Adverse prognostic factors include impaired LVEF and severe dyspnea stages III or IV.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Waiting Lists , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Female , Male , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Algeria/epidemiology , Waiting Lists/mortality , Prospective Studies , Registries , Time Factors , Time-to-TreatmentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular systolic function may be overestimated in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation when using left ventricle ejection fraction. The Global longitudinal strain is a measure less dependent on left ventricle load. However, the clinical and echocardiographic parameters associated with the alteration of Global longitudinal strain in secondary mitral regurgitation have not been evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 12.1 years, 59.3% male) with secondary mitral regurgitation and low left ventricle ejection fraction < 50% were included. The study population was subdivided according to the Global longitudinal strain value with which an increased risk of all-cause mortality was associated (Global longitudinal strain < 7.0%, left ventricle systolic function impaired compared to Global longitudinal strain ≥ 7.0%, in absolute value). The clinical and echocardiographic endpoints are analysed in both groups of patients. RESULTS: The strong and clear correlation between Global longitudinal strain (mean ± standard deviation: 7,2 ± 2,7) and parameters of systolic function (left ventricle ejection fraction mean ± standard deviation: 32,4 ± 8,0%) and contractility (dp/dt mean ± standard deviation: 682,5 ± 204,7 mmHg/s). the mean of left ventricle ejection fraction = 26.4 ± 5.3% in the Global longitudinal strain < 7 group, and the bivariate study using the 30% threshold shows that the Global longitudinal strain < 7 group presents a more altered left ventricle ejection fraction with odds ratio = 12, 5 (CI: 4.7-33.0) p < 0.001. In multivariate analysis of ultrasound parameters and linear regression shows a significant correlation between Global longitudinal strain and left ventricle ejection fraction (p < 0.001). The dp/dt analysis found a mean of 509.3 ± 99.1 mmHg/s in the Global longitudinal strain < 7 group and of 822.9 ± 154.1 in the Global longitudinal strain ≥ 7 group with significant difference (p < 0.001). In bivariate and multivariate analysis, the alteration of Global longitudinal strain is associated with a significantly lower dp / dt p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: A Global longitudinal strain < 7 (in absolute value) reflects a severe impairment of left ventricle function. In addition, several parameters were associated with this severe alteration of the Global longitudinal strain, namely a lower left ventricle ejection fraction, a lower dp/dt and more severe symptoms permitting to characterized this group of patients in addition to an integration in a multiparametric evaluation of the secondary mitral regurgitation.
Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/complications , Global Longitudinal Strain , Echocardiography , Ventricular Function, Left , Ultrasonography , Stroke VolumeABSTRACT
We report a case of a 73 year-old man admitted for acute mesenteric ischaemia. Eight years before, he had a first mesenteric ischaemic event treated by left colectomy and angioplasty of both main coeliac artery (MCA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA); the patient was discharged on lifelong clopidogrel and aspirin. One month before his admission for the index event, he had a major haematuria; clopidogrel was stopped first, then aspirin because of recurrent haematuria. Five days after withdrawal of both antiplatelet drugs, the patient presented with acute mesenteric ischaemia. Urgent aortography showed in-stent occlusion of SMA and in-stent restenosis of MCA; we performed ad hoc thrombus aspiration of SMA and balloon angioplasty of MCA. The patient was discharged seven days after, without complications. This case shows that very late stent thrombosis in digestive artery can occur in the setting of antiplatelet arrest and urgent endovascular intervention constitutes a seductive alternative for surgery when performed early after symptoms onset.
