Age-friendly health care and the 4Ms in RN-led annual wellness visits.

BACKGROUND: Medicare annual wellness visits (AWVs) are prevention-focused healthcare visits free to Medicare recipients. These visits focus on health maintenance, health risk assessment, prevention of illness, and maintaining independence, all of which are within the scope of registered nurse (RN) practice as well as aligned with what matters, medication, mentation, and mobility - the 4Ms - of age-friendly health care. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the implementation of the 4Ms in the context of RN-led Medicare AWVs in a primary care practice. METHODS: In a primary care practice with approximately 2500 patients, including approximately 571 of whom were enrolled in Medicare, RN-led Medicare AWVs were implemented, incorporating the 4Ms framework. During this time, data were collected on the effect of the AWV on access to care-conceptualized here as the number of visits available as well as the type of clinician open to staff these visits. Data collection also included patient responses to the 4Ms question "what matters most?" RESULTS: Overall, the RN-led visits were successful and beneficial to the practice. Each RN-led visit allowed for 2 additional acute or monitoring visits per provider (nurse practitioner, MD) per day, increasing patient access to their primary care providers. Inclusion of the 4Ms questions facilitated discussion around overall mental and emotional well-being, life stressors, quality of life, and goals of care. CONCLUSION: RN-led Medicare AWVs incorporating the 4Ms framework enhances the role of RNs in primary care by focusing on a health promotion role, utilizing RNs to their full scope of practice. RN-led AWVs increase provider availability for acute and chronic care appointments, as well as foster conversations around quality of life, as well as mental and emotional well-being.

Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study protocol : a randomised controlled trial comparing primary unassisted patency at 1 year of primary arteriovenous fistulae created under regional compared to local anaesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the 'gold standard' vascular access for haemodialysis. Universal usage is limited, however, by a high early failure rate. Several small, single-centre studies have demonstrated better early patency rates for AVF created under regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with local anaesthesia (LA). The mechanistic hypothesis is that the sympathetic blockade associated with RA causes vasodilatation and increased blood flow through the new AVF. Despite this, considerable variation in practice exists in the UK. A high-quality, adequately powered, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to definitively inform practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study is a multicentre, observer-blinded RCT comparing primary radiocephalic/brachiocephalic AVF created under regional versus LA. The primary outcome is primary unassisted AVF patency at 1 year. Access-specific (eg, stenosis/thrombosis), patient-specific (including health-related quality of life) and safety secondary outcomes will be evaluated. Health economic analysis will also be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ACCess study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research and ethics committee number 3 (20/WS/0178). Results will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals within 12 months of completion of the trial. We will also present our findings at key national and international renal and anaesthetic meetings, and support dissemination of trial outcomes via renal patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14153938. SPONSOR: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde GN19RE456, Protocol V.1.3 (8 May 2021), REC/IRAS ID: 290482.

Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation: A national quality improvement project.

Cannulation is essential for haemodialysis with arteriovenous access, but also damages the arteriovenous access making it prone to failure, is associated with complications and affects patients' experiences of haemodialysis. Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation is a national UK quality improvement project, designed to improve cannulation practice in the United Kingdom, ensuring it reflects current needling recommendations. It uses a simple quality improvement method, the Model for Improvement, to structure improvement to cannulation practice. It assists units in the practical implementation of the British Renal Society and Vascular Access Society of Britain and Ireland needling recommendations, ensuring actual cannulation practice reflects what is defined as best practice in cannulation. An eLearning package and awareness materials have been developed, to assist units in changing their cannulation practice. The Kidney Quality Improvement Partnership provides a structure for Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation that promotes development and dissemination. It is hoped that Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation will raise an understanding about the cannulation of arteriovenous access and change behaviours and beliefs around correct cannulation practice, to ensure longevity of this lifeline.

A randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous suturing techniques for radiocephalic fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous suturing techniques have conventionally been used for the end-to-side anastomoses of radiocephalic fistulas (RCFs); however, primary patency rates are poor. Only 50% to 60% of RCFs ever achieve functional patency. We hypothesized that a hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique (as used in many microsurgical procedures) may improve outcomes in fistulas constructed from small vessels. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial comparing hybrid interrupted-continuous (n = 42) with continuous (n = 36) suturing techniques for RCF was undertaken. Patients were excluded if vessels were <1.8 mm in diameter or if previous ipsilateral fistula had been attempted. A priori power calculation indicated that a sample size of 78 patients was required to detect an improvement in patency from 50% to 80% (α = .05, ß = .8). The primary end point was primary patency at 6 weeks (assessed by a blinded observer for the presence of thrill and bruit). Secondary end points were immediate patency, functional patency (assessed clinically and by ultrasound) at 6 weeks, and presence of anastomotic stenosis. RESULTS: Groups were comparable for basic patient demographics, operating surgeon, and vessel diameter as measured on preoperative ultrasound (mean age, 58.9 ± 13 years; 68% male). Primary patency at 6 weeks was higher in the hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique group (71% vs 47%; P = .01). Immediate patency was also higher in the hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique group (93% vs 67%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in functional patency at 6 weeks (52% vs 36%; P = .18). Three patients developed an anastomotic stenosis. All were in the hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique group. One patient from the interrupted suturing technique cohort required re-exploration for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique yielded higher immediate and 6-week primary patency rates for RCF. The hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique may improve anastomotic compliance and reduce the narrowing and puckering that can occur on suture tightening in small-caliber vessels. Based on these findings, consideration should be given to performing hybrid interrupted-continuous anastomoses for RCFs.

The use of tunneled central venous catheters: inevitable or system failure?

PURPOSE: To evaluate reasons for tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC) usage in our prevalent hemodialysis population and assess the impact of a surgically aggressive approach to definitive access creation. METHODS: Clinical review of all patients in the West of Scotland dialyzing via a TCVC in November 2010 was performed. Reasons for TCVC usage and TCVC complications were evaluated. Over the subsequent year, aggressive intervention was undertaken to achieve definitive access in all suitable patients and outcomes re-evaluated a year later (November 2011). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients dialyzing via a TCVC in 2010 compared to 2011 (30.3% (n=193) vs. 31.7% (n=201), respectively; p=0.56). All patients now have a "vascular access plan." Of patients dialyzing via a TCVC in 2010, 37% had died by 2011, 22% remained on long-term line, 20% had successful arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation, 1% had an arteriovenous graft and 2% were transplanted; 10.4% developed complications of vascular access and required ligation of a functioning AVF. A further 6.5% died within 28 days of surgery. The incidence of culture-positive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia was 1.6 per 1,000 catheter days. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive strategies of AVF creation resulted in one-fifth of patients on a long-term TCVC having successful creation of an AVF. This was offset against high failure and significant complication rate from AVF creation in this population. One-third of patients dialyzing via a TCVC died in the subsequent year. Correct patient selection for AVF creation is essential and predialysis care must be optimized to avoid the need for TCVCs entirely.

The importance of the orthopaedic doctors' appearance: a cross-regional questionnaire based study.

OBJECTIVES: Critics of the Department of Health 'bare below the elbow' guidelines have raised concerns over the impact of these dress regulations on the portrayed image and professionalism of doctors. However, the importance of the doctor's appearance in relation to other professional attributes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of patients on the importance of appearance and the style of clothing worn by doctors. DESIGN: Patient questionnaire survey, administered across four Scottish regions. SETTING: Orthopaedic outpatient departments. PARTICIPANTS: 427 patients and accompanying relatives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The absolute and relative importance of the doctors' appearance, as reported using a 5-point Likert scale. The absolute and relative importance of the style of clothing worn by doctors, as reported using a 5-point Likert scale. The rank preferences for four different styles of doctors' attire as illustrated by standardised clinical photographs. RESULTS: The study was appropriately powered to identify a 0.5 difference in mean rank values with 0.90 power at a = 0.05. The majority of participants felt the doctors' appearance was important but not as important as compassion, politeness and knowledge. Only 50% felt that the style of doctors clothing mattered; what proved more important was an impression of cleanliness and good personal hygiene. In terms of how patients would prefer doctors to dress in clinic, the most popular choice proved to be the smart casual style of dress, which conforms with the 'bare below the elbows' dress code policy. The smart casual clothing style was the highest ranked choice irrespective of patient age, gender, regional or socioeconomic background. CONCLUSIONS: The doctors' appearance is of importance to patients and their relatives, but they view many other attributes as more important than how we choose to dress. While not specifically addressing the role of doctors clothing in the transmission of infection, our results do support the preference of patients for 'bare below the elbows' workplace attire.