Opportunities for Improving the Transplant Assessment and Education Process in British Columbia: Patient and Health Care Provider Perspective.

Background: There are several steps patients and their health care providers must navigate to access kidney transplantation in British Columbia (BC). Objective: We explored perceptions and experiences with the pretransplant process across BC to determine where process improvements can be made to enhance access to transplantation. Design: Anonymous surveys were sent online and via post to health care providers (including nephrologists, registered nurses, and coordinators) and patients across BC. Setting: Kidney care clinics, transplant regional clinics, and provincial transplant centers in BC. Measurements: Surveys included Likert scale questions on the current pretransplant process and transplant education available in BC. The health provider survey focused on understanding the pretransplant process, knowledge, roles, and communication while the patient survey focused on patient education and experience of the pretransplant processes. Results: A total of 100 health care providers and 146 patients responded. Seventy-six percent of health care providers understood their role and responsibility in the pretransplant process, while only 47% understood others' roles in the process. Fifty-nine percent of health care respondents felt adequately supported by the provincial donor and transplant teams. Seventy-one percent of registered nurses and 92% of nephrologists understood transplant eligibility. About 68% and 77% of nurses and nephrologists, respectively, reported having enough knowledge to discuss living donation with patients. Fifty percent of patients had received transplant education, of which 60% had a good grasp of the pretransplant clinical processes. Sixty-three percent felt their respective kidney teams had provided enough advice and tools to support them in finding a living donor. Fifty percent of patients reported feeling up to date with their status in the evaluation process. Limitations: This analysis was conducted between December 2021 and June 2022 and may need to account for practice changes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses are from a selection of health care providers, thus acknowledging a risk of selection bias. Furthermore, we are not able to verify patients who reported receiving formal transplant education from their health care providers. Conclusions: Exploring these themes suggests communication with regional clinics and transplant centers can be improved. In addition, patient and staff education can benefit from education on kidney transplantation and the pretransplant clinical processes. Our findings provide opportunities to develop strategies to actively address modifiable barriers in a patient's kidney transplantation journey.

Contexte: En Colombie-Britannique (C.-B.), pour accéder à la transplantation, les patients et leurs prestataires de soins doivent traverser plusieurs étapes. Objectif: Nous avons exploré les perceptions et expériences en lien avec le processus de pré-transplantation dans toute la Colombie-Britannique, afin de cibler les améliorations qui pourraient y être apportées pour faciliter l'accès à la transplantation. Conception: Des sondages anonymes ont été envoyés en ligne et par la poste aux prestataires de soins de santé (notamment des néphrologues, des infirmières autorisées et des coordonnateurs) et aux patients de partout en Colombie-Britannique. Cadre de l'étude: Cliniques de soins rénaux, cliniques régionales de transplantation et centres provinciaux de transplantation en Colombie-Britannique. Mesures: Les sondages comprenaient des questions à échelles de Likert portant sur le processus actuel de pré-transplantation et l'éducation offerte sur la transplantation en Colombie-Britannique. Le sondage destiné aux prestataires de soins portait sur leur compréhension du processus de pré-transplantation, leurs connaissances, leurs rôles et la communication; le sondage destiné aux patients portait sur l'éducation reçue et leur expérience des processus de pré-transplantation. Résultats: En tout, 100 prestataires de soins et 146 patients ont répondu au sondage. Parmi les prestataires de soins, 76 % comprenaient leur rôle et leurs responsabilités dans le processus de pré-transplantation, mais 47 % seulement comprenaient le rôle des autres prestataires de soins dans le processus. Une proportion de 59 % des intervenants en santé se sentait adéquatement appuyée par les équipes provinciales de dons d'organes et de transplantation. Une grande majorité des infirmières autorisées (71 %) et des néphrologues (92 %) comprenaient les critères d'admissibilité à la transplantation. Les infirmières (68 %) et les néphrologues (77 %) estimaient avoir suffisamment de connaissances pour discuter du don vivant avec les patients. Quant aux patients, 50 % avaient reçu de l'éducation sur la transplantation et, de ceux-ci, 60 % avaient une bonne compréhension des processus cliniques de pré-transplantation. La majorité des patients (63 %) estimaient avoir reçu suffisamment de conseils et d'outils de la part de leurs équipes de soins rénaux pour les aider à trouver un donneur vivant. La moitié des patients (50 %) pensaient connaître leur statut dans le processus d'évaluation. Limites: Cette étude a été réalisée entre décembre 2021 et juin 2022 et pourrait devoir tenir compte des changements de pratiques survenus pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. Les réponses provenant d'une sélection de prestataires de soins de santé, nous reconnaissons ainsi un possible biais de sélection. Enfin, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'évaluer les patients qui ont déclaré avoir reçu de l'éducation formelle sur la transplantation de la part de leurs prestataires de soins. Conclusion: L'exploration de ces thèmes a suggéré que la communication avec les cliniques régionales et les centres de transplantation peut être améliorée. De plus, les patients et le personnel soignant pourraient tirer profit d'éducation sur la transplantation rénale et les processus cliniques de pré-transplantation. Nos résultats offrent des occasions d'élaborer des stratégies pour s'attaquer activement aux obstacles modifiables dans le parcours de transplantation rénale d'un patient.

Immunosuppression Therapy in Kidney Transplantation.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred choice of treatment of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Improvement in surgical techniques and immunotherapy has transformed the field of kidney transplantation. Patients undergoing a kidney transplant have a 95% and 90% graft survival rate at one and 5 years. Although advances in immunosuppressive agents have reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the outcome of kidney grafts is still limited by chronic rejection and complications of these medications. The goal of kidney transplantation is to use the combination of immunosuppressive agents that best optimizes allograft and patient survival while limiting drug toxicity and complications. In this review, the immunology of transplantation is described with a focus on current immunosuppressive agents used in kidney transplantation.

ANCA-associated renal vasculitis is associated with rurality but not seasonality or deprivation in a complete national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Small studies suggest an association between ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) incidence and rurality, seasonality and socioeconomic deprivation. We examined the incidence of kidney biopsy-proven AAV and its relationship with these factors in the adult Scottish population. METHODS: Using the Scottish Renal Biopsy Registry, all adult native kidney biopsies performed between 2014 and 2018 with a diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) were identified. The Scottish Government Urban Rural Classification was used for rurality analysis. Seasons were defined as autumn (September-November), winter (December-February), spring (March-May) and summer (June-August). Patients were separated into quintiles of socioeconomic deprivation using the validated Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and incidence standardised to age. Estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine protein:creatinine ratio at time of biopsy were used to assess disease severity. RESULTS: 339 cases of renal AAV were identified, of which 62% had MPA and 38% had GPA diagnosis. AAV incidence was 15.1 per million population per year (pmp/year). Mean age was 66 years and 54% were female. Incidence of GPA (but not MPA) was positively associated with rurality (5.2, 8.4 and 9.1 pmp/year in 'urban', 'accessible remote' and 'rural remote' areas, respectively; p=0.04). The age-standardised incidence ratio was similar across all quintiles of deprivation (p=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Seasonality and disease severity did not vary across AAV study groups. In this complete national cohort study, we observed a positive association between kidney biopsy-proven GPA and rurality.

Renal Disease in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterised by lymphocytic infiltration of the exocrine glands, predominantly the salivary and lacrimal glands, leading to sicca symptoms. Patients may have extraglandular disease involving multiple organs, including the kidneys. 5% of patients with pSS can have renal involvement. Kidney disease in pSS presents a diagnostic challenge, as clinical symptoms are often insidious and can precede sicca symptoms. pSS affects the kidney through lymphocytic infiltration of renal tubules or immune complex deposition, leading to an array of clinical features. Tubulointerstitial nephritis is the most common histological pattern of kidney disease. Other tubular injuries include renal tubular acidosis with hypokalaemia, Fanconi's syndrome and diabetes insipidus. Glomerular disease is less common and typically involves an immune complex-mediated process. Optimal treatment for kidney diseases in pSS is not established, and treatment is guided by the pattern of disease. For tubulointerstitial nephritis, management involves electrolyte imbalance correction and the use of immunosuppression, including steroids. Treatment of glomerular disease is targeted to the histological pattern, and often requires a combination of immunosuppressive agents. The risk of end-stage kidney disease is low. Nevertheless, patients with pSS and kidney disease have significantly reduced quality of life.

Impact of introducing electronic acute kidney injury alerts in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with decreased survival, future risk of chronic kidney disease and longer hospital stays. Electronic alerts (e-alerts) for AKI have been introduced in the UK in order to facilitate earlier detection and improve management. The aim of this study was to establish if e-alerts in primary care were acted on by examining timing of repeat creatinine testing. METHODS: The National Health Service England Acute Kidney Injury electronic alert algorithm was introduced in April 2015 across both primary and secondary care in NHS Tayside accompanied by a programme of education. Data from a 12-month period (2012) predating introduction of the e-alerts were compared with a 12-month period following implementation of e-alerts for AKI. Biochemistry testing following the AKI episode, timing of repeat tests and numbers of patients hospitalized within 7 days of episode were compared between the two time periods. RESULTS: During the 12 months after e-alert introduction, 9781 AKI e-alerts were generated. Of these, 1460 (14.9%) alerts were generated in primary care. Median duration to repeat blood testing for these primary care alerts was 5 days for AKI Stage 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-10], 2 days for Stage 2 (IQR 1-5) and 1 day (IQR 0-2) for Stage 3. During 2012 (prior to e-alert implementation) 8812 AKI episodes were identified. Of these, 2650 tests (30.1%) were requested by primary care staff. Median duration to repeat creatinine testing was longer: 55 days (IQR 20-142) for Stage 1, 38 days (IQR 15-128) for Stage 2 was and 53 days (IQR 20-137) for Stage 3. More patients had biochemistry tests repeated within 7 days of AKI onset, pre-alert implementation; 252 (9.5%) versus 857 (58.7%) (P < 0.001). Rates of hospitalization within 7 days of AKI increased from 342 (12.9%) pre-implementation to 372 (25.5%) post-implementation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within primary care, e-alert implementation was associated with higher rates of creatinine monitoring, but also higher rates of hospitalization.