Musculoskeletal injuries in real tennis.

Introduction: Real tennis is a growing, unique, and well-established sport. To date, there has been no epidemiological data on real tennis injuries. The primary aim of this retrospective study is to record the incidence and document any trends in real tennis musculoskeletal injuries, so as to improve injury awareness of common and possibly preventable injuries. Methods: A surveillance questionnaire e-mailed to 2,036 Tennis & Rackets Association members to retrospectively capture injuries sustained by amateur and professional real tennis players over their playing careers. Results: A total of 485 (438 males and 47 females) questionnaires were fully completed over 4 weeks. A total of 662 musculoskeletal injuries were recorded with a mean of 1.4 injuries per player (range 0-7). The incidence of sustaining an acute real tennis musculoskeletal injury is 0.4/1000 hrs. The three main anatomical locations reported injured were elbow 15.6% (103/662), knee 11.6% (77/662), and face 10.0% (66/662). The most common structures reported injured were muscle 24% (161/661), tendon 23.4% (155/661), ligament 7.0% (46/661), soft tissue bruising 6.5% (43/661), and eye 6.2% (41/661). The majority of the upper limb injuries were gradual onset (64.7%, 143/221), and the lower limb injuries were sudden onset (72.0%, 188/261). Conclusion: This study uniquely provides valuable preliminary data on the incidence and patterns of musculoskeletal injuries in real tennis players. In addition, it highlights a number of reported eye injuries. The study is also a benchmark for future prospective studies on academy and professional real tennis players.

Non-resurfacing techniques in the management of the patella at total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses support not resurfacing the patella at the time of TKA. Several different modes of intervention are reported for non-resurfacing management of the patella at TKA. METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-resurfacing interventions in TKA. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) study methodology and reporting system was adopted, utilising the PRISMA checklist and statement. Classes of patella interventions were defined as: 0. No intervention. 1. Osteophyte excision only. 2. Osteophyte excision, denervation, with soft tissue debridement. 3. Osteophyte excision, denervation, soft tissue debridement, and drilling or micro-fracture of eburnated bone. 4. Patellar resurfacing. A meta-analysis was conducted upon the pre- and post-operative KSS for each technique. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-three studies were identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and eight for the meta-analysis. Two studies compared different non-resurfacing patellar techniques, the other studies used the non-resurfacing cohort as controls for their prospective RCTs comparing patellar resurfacing with non-resurfacing. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is no significant difference in KSS for differing non-resurfacing patellar techniques, but further trials using patellofemoral specific scores may better demonstrate superior efficacy of specific classes of patella intervention, by virtue of greater sensitivity for patellofemoral pain and dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Results of early surgical intervention after suboptimal ankle fracture fixation.

Ankle fractures are common injuries and commonly require operative stabilisation. The aim of ankle fracture fixation should be reduction and stabilisation, as for any periarticular fracture. Anatomical reduction will lead to good long-term results, but non-anatomically reduced fractures will lead to a poor functional outcome and development of osteoarthritis. We reviewed eight cases of non-anatomical ankle fixations that were revised by M.D. over a 4-year period. All were revised within 1 year of initial fixation. Clinical scoring for functional outcome was performed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society rating system for the ankle and hindfoot. All patients reported improved function after the revision procedure. We conclude that revision surgery is justified if suboptimal fixation is encountered within 12 months of the original surgery.