Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett ; 29(16): 2320-2326, 2019 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31235262

ABSTRACT

The design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 3-aryl-indazole derivatives as peripherally selective pan-Trk inhibitors are described. Three strategies were used to obtain a potent compound exhibiting low central nervous system (CNS) penetration and high plasma exposure: 1) a structure-based drug design (SBDD) approach was used to improve potency; 2) a substrate for an efflux transporter for lowering brain penetration was explored; and 3) the most basic pKa (pKa-MB) value was used as an indicator to identify compounds with good membrane permeability. This enabled the identification of the peripherally targeted 17c with the potency, kinase-selectivity, and plasma exposure required to demonstrate in vivo efficacy in a Complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced thermal hypersensitivity model.


Subject(s)
Drug Discovery , Indazoles/pharmacology , Pain/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Indazoles/chemical synthesis , Indazoles/chemistry , Molecular Structure , Pain/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemical synthesis , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Structure-Activity Relationship
2.
Mol Cell Biol ; 36(1): 144-56, 2016 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26483416

ABSTRACT

Estrogens are effective in the treatment of prostate cancer; however, the effects of estrogens on prostate cancer are enigmatic. In this study, we demonstrated that estrogen (17ß-estradiol [E2]) has biphasic effects on prostate tumor growth. A lower dose of E2 increased tumor growth in mouse xenograft models using DU145 and PC-3 human prostate cancer cells, whereas a higher dose significantly decreased tumor growth. We found that anchorage-independent apoptosis in these cells was inhibited by E2 treatment. Similarly, in vivo angiogenesis was suppressed by E2. Interestingly, these effects of E2 were abolished by knockdown of either estrogen receptor ß (ERß) or Krüppel-like zinc finger transcription factor 5 (KLF5). Ιn addition, E2 suppressed KLF5-mediated transcription through ERß, which inhibits proapoptotic FOXO1 and proangiogenic PDGFA expression. Furthermore, we revealed that a nonagonistic ER ligand GS-1405 inhibited FOXO1 and PDGFA expression through the ERß-KLF5 pathway and regulated prostate tumor growth without ERß transactivation. Therefore, these results suggest that E2 biphasically modulates prostate tumor formation by regulating KLF5-dependent transcription through ERß and provide a new strategy for designing ER modulators, which will be able to regulate prostate cancer progression with minimal adverse effects due to ER transactivation.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Receptor beta/metabolism , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/metabolism , Prostate/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Estradiol/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Estrogens/metabolism , Humans , Male , Mice , Signal Transduction
3.
J Biol Chem ; 289(8): 4928-40, 2014 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24375404

ABSTRACT

Tetramerization of p53 is crucial to exert its biological activity, and nucleolar disruption is sufficient to activate p53. We previously demonstrated that nucleolar stress induces translocation of the nucleolar protein MYBBP1A from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm and enhances p53 activity. However, whether and how MYBBP1A regulates p53 tetramerization in response to nucleolar stress remain unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that MYBBP1A enhances p53 tetramerization, followed by acetylation under nucleolar stress. We found that MYBBP1A has two regions that directly bind to lysine residues of the p53 C-terminal regulatory domain. MYBBP1A formed a self-assembled complex that provided a molecular platform for p53 tetramerization and enhanced p300-mediated acetylation of the p53 tetramer. Moreover, our results show that MYBBP1A functions to enhance p53 tetramerization that is necessary for p53 activation, followed by cell death with actinomycin D treatment. Thus, we suggest that MYBBP1A plays a pivotal role in the cellular stress response.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleolus/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins/metabolism , Protein Multimerization , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , Acetylation , Binding Sites , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA-Binding Proteins , E1A-Associated p300 Protein/metabolism , Humans , Models, Biological , Nuclear Proteins/chemistry , Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins/chemistry , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Protein Binding , Protein Structure, Tertiary , RNA-Binding Proteins , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
4.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 434(3): 659-63, 2013 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23583237

ABSTRACT

Nucleolar dynamics are important for cellular stress response. We previously demonstrated that nucleolar stress induces nucleolar protein Myb-binding protein 1A (MYBBP1A) translocation from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm and enhances p53 activity. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is understood to a lesser extent. Here we demonstrate that MYBBP1A interacts with lysine residues in the C-terminal regulatory domain region of p53. MYBBP1A specifically interacts with nonacetylated p53 and induces p53 acetylation. We propose that MYBBP1A dissociates from acetylated p53 because MYBBP1A did not interact with acetylated p53 and because MYBBP1A was not recruited to the p53 target promoter. Therefore, once p53 is acetylated, MYBBP1A dissociates from p53 and interacts with nonacetylated p53, which enables another cycle of p53 activation. Based on our observations, this MYBBP1A-p53 binding property can account for efficient p53-activation by MYBBP1A under nucleolar stress. Our results support the idea that MYBBP1A plays catalytic roles in p53 acetylation and activation.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins/metabolism , Transcriptional Activation , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , Acetylation , Amino Acid Sequence , Base Sequence , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , DNA Primers , DNA-Binding Proteins , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA-Binding Proteins , Transcription Factors , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/chemistry
5.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 65, 2013 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23388179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tumor suppressor p53 is mutated in a wide variety of human cancers and plays a critical role in anoikis, which is essential for preventing tumorigenesis. Recently, we found that a nucleolar protein, Myb-binding protein 1a (MYBBP1A), was involved in p53 activation. However, the function of MYBBP1A in cancer prevention has not been elucidated. METHODS: Relationships between MYBBP1A expression levels and breast cancer progression were examined using patient microarray databases and tissue microarrays. Colony formation, xenograft, and anoikis assays were conducted using cells in which MYBBP1A was either knocked down or overexpressed. p53 activation and interactions between p53 and MYBBP1A were assessed by immunoprecipitation and western blot. RESULTS: MYBBP1A expression was negatively correlated with breast cancer tumorigenesis. In vivo and in vitro experiments using the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and ZR-75-1, which expresses wild type p53, showed that tumorigenesis, colony formation, and anoikis resistance were significantly enhanced by MYBBP1A knockdown. We also found that MYBBP1A binds to p53 and enhances p53 target gene transcription under anoikis conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MYBBP1A is required for p53 activation during anoikis; therefore, it is involved in suppressing colony formation and the tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells. Collectively, our results suggest that MYBBP1A plays a role in tumor prevention in the context of p53 activation.


Subject(s)
Anoikis , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , Acetylation , Animals , Blotting, Western , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Proliferation , DNA-Binding Proteins , Databases, Genetic , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Immunoprecipitation , MCF-7 Cells , Mice , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Protein Binding , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , RNA Interference , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins , Time Factors , Tissue Array Analysis , Transcription Factors , Transcription, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation , Transfection , Tumor Burden , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics
6.
Sci Signal ; 4(168): ra22, 2011 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21487105

ABSTRACT

Clinical evidence suggests that antiestrogens inhibit the development of androgen-insensitive prostate cancer. Here, we show that the estrogen receptor ß (ERß) mediates inhibition by the antiestrogen ICI 182,780 (ICI) and its enhancement by estrogen. ERß associated with gene promoters through the tumor-suppressing transcription factor KLF5 (Krüppel-like zinc finger transcription factor 5). ICI treatment increased the recruitment of the transcription coactivator CBP [CREB (adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate response element-binding protein)-binding protein] to the promoter of FOXO1 through ERß and KLF5, which enhanced the transcription of FOXO1. The increase in FOXO1 abundance led to anoikis in prostate cancer cells, thereby suppressing tumor growth. In contrast, estrogen induced the formation of complexes containing ERß, KLF5, and the ubiquitin ligase WWP1 (WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1), resulting in the ubiquitination and degradation of KLF5. The combined presence of KLF5 and ERß positively correlated with longer cancer-specific survival in prostate cancer patients. Our results demonstrate that estrogens and antiestrogens affect prostate tumor growth through ERß-mediated regulation of KLF5.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Receptor beta/metabolism , Estrogens/pharmacology , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Aged , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , CREB-Binding Protein/genetics , CREB-Binding Protein/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Estradiol/analogs & derivatives , Estradiol/pharmacology , Estrogen Receptor beta/genetics , Forkhead Box Protein O1 , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Forkhead Transcription Factors/metabolism , Fulvestrant , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Humans , Immunoblotting , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/genetics , Male , Mice , Middle Aged , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Protein Binding/drug effects , RNA Interference , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Tumor Burden/drug effects , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
7.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 370(1): 145-8, 2008 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18355447

ABSTRACT

PPARgamma is a nuclear hormone receptor that plays a key role in the induction of peroxisome proliferation. A number of studies showed that PPARgamma ligands suppress cell cycle progression; however, the mechanism remains to be determined. Here, we showed that PPARgamma ligand troglitazone inhibited G1/S transition in colon cancer cells, LS174T. Troglitazone did not affect on either expression of CDK inhibitor (p18) or Wnt signaling pathway, indicating that these pathways were not involved in the troglitazone-dependent cell cycle arrest. GeneChip and RT-PCR analyses revealed that troglitazone decreased mRNA levels of cell cycle regulatory factors E2F2 and cyclin-E1 whose expression is activated by E2F2. Down-regulation of E2F2 by troglitazone results in decrease of cyclin-E1 transcription, which could inhibit phosphorylation of Rb protein, and consequently evoke the suppression of E2F2 transcriptional activity. Thus, we propose that troglitazone suppresses the feedback loop containing E2F2, cyclin-E1, and Rb protein.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Chromans/pharmacology , Colonic Neoplasms/metabolism , Cyclin E/antagonists & inhibitors , E2F2 Transcription Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Oncogene Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , PPAR gamma/agonists , Thiazolidinediones/pharmacology , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cyclin E/genetics , Cyclin E/metabolism , E2F2 Transcription Factor/genetics , E2F2 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Humans , Ligands , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , PPAR gamma/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/antagonists & inhibitors , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Retinoblastoma Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Retinoblastoma Protein/genetics , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Troglitazone , Wnt Proteins/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...