ABSTRACT
While several clinical trials have suggested that leukocytapheresis (LCAP) by filtration can benefit patients with active ulcerative colitis, the mechanisms underlying these benefits are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to address the mechanisms that may underlie the therapeutic effects of LCAP using a dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis model in rats. Treatment with the active column, but not the sham column, improved disease severity by down-regulating pro-inflammatory events, including the cell-proliferative responses and inflammatory cytokine and reactive oxygen production, as well as by up-regulating protective events, including hepatocyte growth factor production, bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cell induction, and colonic blood flow levels, which were mediated predominantly by calcitonin gene-related peptide. The improvement was also associated with the increase of Ki-67 labeling in the colonic epithelium. In conclusion, the LCAP procedure was used in a dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis model in rats under extracorporeal circulation conditions. This approach down-regulated pro-inflammatory events and up-regulated protective events in association with disease improvement. These data suggest that LCAP is feasible in animals and should shed light on the mechanisms of LCAP in clinical settings.
Subject(s)
Colitis/therapy , Leukapheresis/methods , Animals , Bone Marrow Cells/cytology , Colitis/chemically induced , Colon/blood supply , Dextran Sulfate , Disease Models, Animal , Down-Regulation , Epithelial Cells/cytology , Extracorporeal Circulation , Filtration/methods , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry , Leukapheresis/instrumentation , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
Two molecules with known growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) agonist activity were used as templates to computationally screen approximately 80000 compounds. A total of 108 candidate compounds were selected, and five of them were found to be active in the low-micromolar range in both cell-based and direct binding assays. These compounds were structurally diverse and significantly differed from known GHS agonists. The most active compound was subjected to SAR evaluation, which slightly increased its potency and identified molecular regions important for specific GHS agonist activity.
