Holter ECG assessment of the effects of three different local anesthetic solutions on cardiovascular system in the sedated dental patients with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of lidocaine alone, epinephrine-combined lidocaine and prilocaine with octapressin on the cardiovascular system during minor oral surgery of sedated cardiac dental patients under local anesthesia. METHODS: Connected to a Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor for a total of 5 hours starting 1 hour before the procedure, twenty patients with high risk of coronary artery disease were included in the prospective cohort study. All the patients had three operations at 3 different appointments with at least one-week intervals and each operation was performed under local anesthesia achieved by 3.6 mL of 3% prilocaine with octapressin, 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:80.000 epinephrine and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine without a vasoconstrictor. Data of the Holter ECG device assessed at the end of every hour and evaluated statistically. Repeated measures ANOVA, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon signed ranks test were used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: Heart-rate showed significant differences between lidocaine with epinephrine and pure lidocaine in an hour following the injection (p<0.05 for all). Cardiac rhythm showed significant differences between prilocaine with octapressin and pure lidocaine at the second hour after its administration (p<0.05 for all). There were no significant differences between 3 local anesthetics in terms of ST segment deviation. CONCLUSION: In minor oral operation on the sedated patients with cardiac disease, the use of 3.6 mL or a less amount of local anesthetic injection containing epinephrine appears to be a predictable and safe method.

Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint.

PURPOSE: The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the clinical effects and long-term results of the transmandibular symphyseal distraction technique for the correction of mandibular transverse deficiencies. This was achieved by assessing the dental, skeletal, and temporomandibular joint changes in the sagittal, vertical, and axial planes using cephalograms, dental casts, and computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients with mandibular transverse deficiencies (3 females and 4 males), aged 14.3 to 22.5 years (mean 16.2), were treated with a bone-borne transmandibular distractor. Lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric films, CT scans of both temporomandibular joints, and dental casts were obtained preoperatively, at the end of the distraction period, and at the end of 3 years (clinical follow-up period). The clinical findings were assessed according to the morphologic and functional success criteria established by the Steering Group of European Collaboration on Cranial Facial Anomalies for patients with developmental dentofacial anomalies undergoing craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. The statistical analysis of cephalometric films and dental cast measurements was done using the paired t test. The mean postoperative examination period was 40 months (range 36 to 48). RESULTS: The desired amount of distraction was achieved in all patients (mean 6.48 mm). The intraoperative and postoperative complications encountered included damage to the central incisors during vertical osteotomy (1 patient), wound dehiscence after a latent period (3 patients), mild temporomandibular joint pain during the distraction period (3 patients), and chronic gingivitis around the activation rods (7 patients). The success criteria for craniofacial distraction osteogenesis were fulfilled at the end of the 3-year follow-up period. Model analysis showed that the maximal amount of expansion was achieved at the premolar region (first premolar 5.79 mm, second premolar 5.07 mm). Frontal (posteroanterior) cephalograms taken at the end of the distraction period revealed significant increases in the bicondylar (0.35 mm), bigonion (3.43 mm), biantegonion (2.29 mm), and intermolar (4.0 mm) widths, and the ramal angle had decreased significantly (-1.64 degrees). The increase in the transverse measurements was greater at the dentoalveolar level than at the base of the mandible. Lateral cephalograms showed that transmandibular symphyseal distraction produced significant increases in the incisor mandibular plane angle (2.79 degrees) and mandibular body length (1.72 mm). The effect of the procedure on the condyle was 2.5 degrees to 3 degrees of distolateral rotation as calculated using the CT scans. Dental crowding was resolved rapidly by the movement of the teeth into the distraction regenerate. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiologic results of the present study have shown that a transmandibular distractor is a clinically effective bone-borne distractor for the correction of mandibular transverse deficiencies and anterior crowding. The follow-up cephalograms and CT scans showed the transverse skeletal stability of the distraction procedure and no permanent temporomandibular dysfunction. However, additional multicenter studies with more patients are necessary to precisely evaluate the long-term postdistraction changes on the skeleton, teeth, and temporomandibular joint.

Transpalatal distraction using bone-borne distractor: clinical observations and dental and skeletal changes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this clinical study was to analyze the outcome, complications, and long-term results of transpalatal distraction for the correction of maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) and assess skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse planes through cephalograms and dental casts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten adult patients with MTD were treated with a Transpalatal Distractor (Surgi-Tec, Bruges, Belgium). Lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric films and dental casts were taken before surgery and at the end of the consolidation period. The statistical analysis of cephalometric film and dental cast measurements was undertaken with paired t tests. RESULTS: The intraoperative and postoperative problems encountered were damage to the central incisive teeth as a result of vertical osteotomy, wound dehiscence after the latent period, pain during the distraction period, and loosening of the distractor and buccal displacement of the left alveolar segment during the consolidation period. Model analysis showed that the greatest amount of transverse increase was in the premolar region (7.07 mm for first premolar and 7.10 mm for second premolar). Frontal cephalometric analysis indicated that transverse distances increased more at the alveolar level (7.75 mm) than in the maxillary base (5.25 mm) and nasal region (4.3 mm). The asymmetries between the left and right sides in both dental and skeletal expansions were statistically nonsignificant. The changes in the Sella-nasion-point A, Sella-nasion-point B, Sella-nasion and gonion-gnasion angles were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, transpalatal distraction was found to be a clinically effective technique for palatal expansion in adult patients with MTD. However, treatment planning and regular clinical follow-up visits are necessary for long-term clinical success.

Results and complications of alveolar distraction osteogenesis to enhance vertical bone height.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the outcome and complications of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient ridges by using intraosseous and extraosseous distractors. STUDY DESIGN: Seven patients with severely atrophic alveolar crests were treated by distraction osteogenesis in 5 alveolar ridge deficiencies by intraosseous distractors and in 2 alveolar ridge deficiencies by extraosseous distractors. The bone deficiencies were secondary to atrophy after periodontal disease, tooth extraction, or trauma. Three months after consolidation of the distracted segments, implants were placed in the distracted areas. The average follow-up period after prosthetic loading was 50 months. RESULTS: The mean alveolar height achieved was 7.8 mm (range, 4-9 mm). The intraoperative and postoperative problems encountered were lack of device activation (n = 1), lingual displacement of the distracted segment (n = 1), paresthesia of the lower lip (n = 4), and dehiscence and plate exposure (n = 2). Most of these complications were considered to be minor complications and were solved without any problems. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that alveolar distraction osteogenesis seems to be an effective technique to treat vertical alveolar ridge deficiencies, but adequate treatment planning is necessary for success. The complications related to this technique can be solved with simple treatments.