ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Tocilizumab, a monoclonal IL-6 receptor blocker, is an effective agent for severe-to-critical cases of COVID-19; however, its target patients for the optimum use need to be detailed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define its effect among severely ill but non-intubated cases with COVID-19. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medrxiv, and Biorxiv until February 13, 2022, for non-intubated cases, and included randomized-controlled trials (RCT) based on bias assessment. The primary outcomes were the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality. Random effect and fixed-effect models were used. The heterogeneity was measured using the χ2 and I2 statistics, with χ2 p ≤ 0.05 and I2 ≥ 50% indicating the presence of significant heterogeneity. We registered the study to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42021232575. RESULTS: Among 261 articles, 11 RCTs were included. The pooled analysis of the 11 RCTs demonstrated that the rate of mortality was significantly lower in the tocilizumab group than in the control group (20.0% and 24.2%, OR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, and heterogeneity I2 = 0%. p = 0.82.). The mechanical ventilation rate was lower in the tocilizumab group than the control group (27% vs 35.2%, OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86, and heterogeneity I2 = 6%. p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Among non-intubated severe COVID-19 cases, tocilizumab reduces the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality compared to standard-of-care treatment.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Respiration, ArtificialABSTRACT
We aimed to describe the effect of aminoglycosides and tigecycline to reduce the mortality in colistin- and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ColR-CR-Kp) infections. We included the studies with defined outcomes after active or non-active antibiotic treatment of ColR-CR-Kp infections. The active treatment was defined as adequate antibiotic use for at least 3 days (72 h) after the diagnosis of ColR-CR-Kp infection by culture. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and the checklist of PRISMA 2020 was applied. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and pooled in the random effects model. Adding aminoglycosides to the existing treatment regimen reduced overall mortality significantly (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.58). Overall mortality was 34% in patients treated with aminoglycoside-combined regimens and was 60% in patients treated with non-aminoglycoside regimens. Treatment with tigecycline is not found to reduce mortality (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.47-1.23). Our results suggest that aminoglycoside addition to the existing regimen of colistin- and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections reduces mortality significantly.
Subject(s)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae , Klebsiella Infections , Sepsis , Aminoglycosides/pharmacology , Aminoglycosides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Colistin/pharmacology , Colistin/therapeutic use , Humans , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Sepsis/drug therapy , Tigecycline/pharmacology , Tigecycline/therapeutic useABSTRACT
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the effectiveness of Favipiravir on the fatality and the requirement of mechanical ventilation for the treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. We searched available literature and reported it by using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Until June 1, 2021, we searched PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar by using the keywords "Favipiravir" and terms synonymous with COVID-19. Studies for Favipiravir treatment compared to standard of care among moderate and severe COVID-19 patients were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and ROBINS-I assessment tool for non-randomized studies. We defined the outcome measures as fatality and requirement for mechanical ventilation. A total of 2702 studies were identified and 12 clinical trials with 1636 patients were analyzed. Nine out of 12 studies were randomized controlled trials. Among the randomized studies, one study has low risk of bias, six studies have moderate risk of bias, and 2 studies have high risk of bias. Observational studies were identified as having moderate risk of bias and non-randomized study was found to have serious risk of bias. Our meta-analysis did not reveal any significant difference between the intervention and the comparator on fatality rate (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.64-1.94) and mechanical ventilation requirement (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.13-1.95). There is no significant difference in fatality rate and mechanical ventilation requirement between Favipiravir treatment and the standard of care in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients.
