Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(12): 1614-1624, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36317355

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The appraisal of disease severity and prediction of adverse outcomes using risk stratification tools at early disease stages is crucial to diminish mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While lung ultrasound (LUS) as an imaging technique for the diagnosis of lung diseases has recently gained a leading position, data demonstrating that it can predict adverse outcomes related to COVID-19 is scarce. The main aim of this study is therefore to assess the clinical significance of bedside LUS in COVID-19 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED). Methods: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to the ED of our hospital between March 2021 and May 2021 and who underwent a 12-zone LUS and a lung computed tomography scan were included prospectively. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to predict adverse events, which was our primary outcome. The secondary outcome was to discover the association of LUS score and computed tomography severity score (CT-SS) with the composite endpoints. Results: We assessed 234 patients [median age 59.0 (46.8-68.0) years; 59.4% M), including 38 (16.2%) in-hospital deaths for any cause related to COVID-19. Higher LUS score and CT-SS was found to be associated with ICU admission, intubation, and mortality. The LUS score predicted mortality risk within each stratum of NEWS. Pairwise analysis demonstrated that after adjusting a base prediction model with LUS score, significantly higher accuracy was observed in predicting both ICU admission (DBA -0.067, P = .011) and in-hospital mortality (DBA -0.086, P = .017). Conclusion: Lung ultrasound can be a practical prediction tool during the course of COVID-19 and can quantify pulmonary involvement in ED settings. It is a powerful predictor of ICU admission, intubation, and mortality and can be used as an alternative for chest computed tomography while monitoring COVID-19-related adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Point-of-Care Systems , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(7): 967-973, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35775674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prognostic prediction and estimation of severity at early stages of acute pancreatitis (AP) are crucial to reduce the complication rates and mortality. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the predicting ability of different clinical and radiological scores in AP. METHODS: We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data from 159 patients diagnosed with AP admitted to Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019. Bedside index for severity AP (BISAP), and acute phys-iology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score at admission, Ranson and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) score at 48 h after admission were calculated. Modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) was also calculated for each patient. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each scoring system for predicting severe AP, pancreatic necrosis, length of hospital stay, and mortality by determining optimal cutoff points from the (ROC) curves. RESULTS: mGPS and APACHE II had the highest AUC (0.929 and 0.823, respectively) to predict severe AP on admission with the best specificity and sensitivity. In predicting mortality BISAP (with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.0%, 70.9%, 98.2%, and 12.0%, respectively, [AUC: 0.793]) and APACHE II (with a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 87.5%, 86.1%, 99.2%, and 25.0%, respectively, [AUC: 0.840]). CONCLUSION: mGPS can be a valuable tool in predicting the patients more likely to develop severe AP and maybe somewhat better than BISAP score, APACHE II Ranson score, and mCTSI.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis , Acute Disease , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Pancreatitis/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Tertiary Care Centers
3.
Cureus ; 14(3): e23012, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35464509

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As the mortality rate in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients older than 65 years is considerable, evaluation of in-hospital mortality is crucial. This study aimed to evaluate in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients older than 65 years using the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (q-SOFA), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). METHODS: This retrospective study included data from 480 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and age over 65 years who were evaluated in a university emergency department in Turkey. Data from eligible but deceased COVID-19 patients was also included. NEWS, q-SOFA, CCI, and ECI scores were retrospectively calculated. All clinical data was accessed from the information management system of the hospital, retrieved, and analyzed. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was seen in 169 patients (169/480). Low oxygen saturation, high C-reactive protein (CRP) and urea levels, and high q-SOFA and ECI scores helped us identify mortality in high-risk patients. A statistically significant difference was found in mortality estimation between q-SOFA and ECI (p <0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Q-SOFA and ECI can be used both easily and practically in the early diagnosis of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 positive patients over 65 years of age admitted to the emergency department. Low oxygen saturation, high CRP and urea levels, and high q-SOFA and ECI scores are helpful in identifying high-risk patients.

4.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(3): 268-275, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35485556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) are simple indicators of inflammatory status previously established as a severity indicator in distinct disease states. This study aimed to determine the impact of these simple hematologic indices with conventional inflammation markers such as C-reactive pro-tein (CRP) and white blood cells in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients and their relationship with AP risk stratification scores including Bedside Index for Severity of Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) and modified Glaskow Prognostic score (mGPS) scores. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed in the emergency department of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University. A total of 171 patients (male/female: 68 [39.8%]/103 [60.3%]) with AP and 59 age and gender matched healthy subjects (male/female: 23 [39%]/36[61%]) as controls were enrolled in the present study. The patients were grouped according to severity and adverse outcomes according to BISAP and mGPS and a comparative analysis was performed to compare the NLR, PLR, and RDW between groups. RESULTS: The mean NLR values of AP patients and control group were 9.62±6.34 and 2.04±1.08, respectively (p<0.001), while the mean PLR values of AP patients and control group were 221.83±122.43 and 83.30±38.89, respectively (p<0.001). Except from RDW, all the other hematologic indices were found to be elevated (p<0.05 for WBC; NLR, PLR, and CRP) on both mild and severe disease at disease onset. NLR and PLR showed significant predictive ability for estimating serious complications associated with AP. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that NLR and PLR is increased in AP. Moreover, peripheral blood NLR and PLR values can predict disease severity and adverse outcomes associated with AP and can be used as an adjunctive marker for estimating disease severity.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis , Acute Disease , Biomarkers , Female , Humans , Lymphocytes , Male , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
5.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(1): 39-47, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34967427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) admission rate for elderly patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is increasing. The AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are two distinct scoring systems proposed to predict in-hospital and post-discharge mortality, length of stay (LOS), and health-related costs in these patients. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of these scoring systems, in conjunction with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), to predict 30-day mortality and LOS in UGIB patients who are 80 years of age or older METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 182 patients with non-variceal UGIB who were admitted to the ED of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Hospital. The AIMS65, GBS, and CCI scores were calculated and adverse patient outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 85.59±4.33 years, and 90 (49.5%) of the patients were males. The AIMS65 was superior to the GBS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.877 vs. 0.695, respectively) and CCI (AUROC 0.877 vs. 0.526, respectively) in predicting the 30-day mortality. All three scores performed poorly in predicting the LOS in hospital. The cutoff threshold that maximized sensitivity and specificity for mortality was three for the AIMS65 score (sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.80; negative predictive values [NPV], 0.977; positive predictive values [PPV], 0.392), 14 for GBS (sensitivity, 0.83; specificity, 0.51; NPV, 0.923; PPV, 0.367), and 5 for CCI (sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.22; NPV, 0.946; PPV, 0.145). CONCLUSION: The AIMS65 is a simple, accurate, and non-endoscopic scoring system that can be performed easily in ED settings. It is superior to GBS and CCI in predicting 30-day mortality in elderly patients with UGIB.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Natl Med J India ; 35(4): 221-228, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36715048

ABSTRACT

Background Mortality due to Covid-19 and severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains high, despite progress in critical care management. We compared the precision of CURB-65 score with monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in prediction of mortality among patients with Covid-19 and CAP presenting to the emergency department. Methods We retrospectively analysed two cohorts of patients admitted to the emergency department of Canakkale University Hospital, namely (i) Covid-19 patients with severe acute respiratory symptoms presenting between 23 March 2020 and 31 October 2020, and (ii) all patients with CAP either from bacterial or viral infection within the 36 months preceding the Covid-19 pandemic. Mortality was defined as in-hospital death or death occurring within 30 days after discharge. Results The first study group consisted of 324 Covid-19 patients and the second group of 257 CAP patients. The non-survivor Covid-19 group had significantly higher MLR, NLR and PLR values. In univariate analysis, in Covid-19 patients, a 1-unit increase in NLR and PLR was associated with increased mortality, and in multivariate analysis for Covid-19 patients, age and NLR remained significant in the final step of the model. According to this model, we found that in the Covid-19 group an increase in 1-unit in NLR would result in an increase by 5% and 7% in the probability of mortality, respectively. According to pairwise analysis, NLR and PLR are as reliable as CURB-65 in predicting mortality in Covid-19. Conclusions Our study indicates that NLR and PLR may serve as reliable predictive factors as CURB-65 in Covid-19 pneumonia, which could easily be used to triage and manage severe patients in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Hospital Mortality , Pandemics , Prognosis
7.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 67(10): 1454-1460, Oct. 2021. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1351426

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Individuals aged ≥65 years are more susceptible to COVID-19 disease and admission to intensive care is most notable. The scoring systems (national early warning score, quick sequential organ failure assessment, shock index) are recommended for rapid assessment of patients in emergency room conditions. The goal of our study is to evaluate scoring systems in conjunction with predictive factors of need for admission to intensive care of patients ≥65 years old with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who applied to the emergency room. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups according to evolution in the emergency room, being those who needed or not intensive care. National Early Warning Score, quick sequential organ failure assessment, shock index scores and serum biochemistry, blood count and blood gas values were evaluated from hospital information management system records. RESULTS: Of the patients included in the study, 80.8% were admitted to the ward and 14.5% to the unit of intensive care. Lymphocyte count, base deficit and bicarbonate levels were lower, and the levels of C-reactive protein, lactate, D-dimer, urea and lactate dehydrogenase were higher in patients who needed intensive care. Quick sequential organ failure assessment and shock index were considered significant in the group admitted to the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that quick sequential organ failure assessment and shock index be used quickly, practically and easily in predicting the need for intensive care unit in patients aged ≥65 years in emergency department diagnosed with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Sepsis , COVID-19 , Prognosis , Turkey , Retrospective Studies , ROC Curve , Hospital Mortality , Critical Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2 , Intensive Care Units
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 546-552, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34547696

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of disease severity and the prediction of clinical outcomes at early disease stages can contribute to decreased mortality in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study was conducted to develop and validate a multivariable risk prediction model for mortality with using a combination of computed tomography severity score (CT-SS), national early warning score (NEWS), and quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We retrospectively collected medical data from 655 adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital between July and November 2020. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory and radiological findings measured as part of standard care at admission were used to calculate NEWS, qSOFA score, CT-SS, peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and shock index (SI). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to predict mortality, which was our primary outcome. The predictive accuracy of distinct scoring systems was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 50.0 years [333 males (50.8%), 322 females (49.2%)]. Higher NEWS and SI was associated with time-to-death within 90-days, whereas higher age, CT-SS and lower PPI were significantly associated with time-to-death within both 14 days and 90 days in the adjusted Cox regression model. The CT-SS predicted different mortality risk levels within each stratum of NEWS and qSOFA and improved the discrimination of mortality prediction models. Combining CT-SS with NEWS score yielded more accurate 14 days (DBA: -0.048, p = 0.002) and 90 days (DBA: -0.066, p < 0.001) mortality prediction. CONCLUSION: Combining severity tools such as CT-SS, NEWS and qSOFA improves the accuracy of predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19. Inclusion of these tools in decision strategies might provide early detection of high-risk groups, avoid delayed medical attention, and improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Perfusion Index , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , COVID-19/physiopathology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis , Survival Rate , Turkey
9.
Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag ; 11(3): 192-195, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34028287

ABSTRACT

We present a patient who was diagnosed with hypothermia in the emergency department and the changes in bedside transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements during and immediately after the diagnoses were recorded. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report in the literature in which TCD data were shared in an accidental hypothermia patient in the emergency department. A 78-year-old male patient was brought to the emergency department with the complaint of speech impairment. The respiratory rate was 24 bpm, pulse rate 40 bpm, body temperature 25.6°C, blood pressure 80/50 mmHg, and glasgow coma scale 11. On electrocardiography, sinus bradycardia (40 bpm) and a small deflection (J wave) at the end of the QRS complex were observed. Immediately after the patient's admission, right middle cerebral artery end diastolic velocity (EDV) was 13.42 cm/s, peak systolic velocity (PSV) was 40.25 cm/s, and pulsatile index (PI) was 1.26 cm/s. After 1 hour, her body temperature was 34.5°C. Measurements with TCD were repeated 1 hour later at the same point and EDV was found to be 26.12 cm/s, PSV 84.02 cm/s, and PI 1.33. At the fourth hour, the patient's body temperature was 36.4°C, he was normothermic, and his mental status completely normalized. The patient was hospitalized for follow-up and treatment. This case supports that it can be used in the evaluation of cerebral perfusion and improvement during treatment in patients with accidental hypothermia in their admission to the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Hypothermia, Induced , Hypothermia , Aged , Blood Flow Velocity , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Cerebral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial
10.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 67(10): 1454-1460, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35018975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Individuals aged ≥65 years are more susceptible to COVID-19 disease and admission to intensive care is most notable. The scoring systems (national early warning score, quick sequential organ failure assessment, shock index) are recommended for rapid assessment of patients in emergency room conditions. The goal of our study is to evaluate scoring systems in conjunction with predictive factors of need for admission to intensive care of patients ≥65 years old with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who applied to the emergency room. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups according to evolution in the emergency room, being those who needed or not intensive care. National Early Warning Score, quick sequential organ failure assessment, shock index scores and serum biochemistry, blood count and blood gas values were evaluated from hospital information management system records. RESULTS: Of the patients included in the study, 80.8% were admitted to the ward and 14.5% to the unit of intensive care. Lymphocyte count, base deficit and bicarbonate levels were lower, and the levels of C-reactive protein, lactate, D-dimer, urea and lactate dehydrogenase were higher in patients who needed intensive care. Quick sequential organ failure assessment and shock index were considered significant in the group admitted to the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that quick sequential organ failure assessment and shock index be used quickly, practically and easily in predicting the need for intensive care unit in patients aged ≥65 years in emergency department diagnosed with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sepsis , Aged , Critical Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey
11.
Int J Biometeorol ; 65(4): 503-511, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145619

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is defined as the presence of free air inside the pleural space. Many studies have reported that meteorological variables may trigger SP, but the mechanism is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of meteorological variables on the development of SP in two regions with different altitudes. The study was conducted in the Çanakkale (2 m above sea level) and the Erzurum region (1758 m). A total of 494 patients with SP who presented to the hospitals of the two regions between January 2011 and December 2016 were included in the study. The meteorological variables used included ambient temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, precipitation amount, wind speed, and wind direction (as north and south). The total 2192 days were divided into two as days with and without an SP case presentation. A 4-day period prior to the day a case presented was compared with the other days without any cases to investigate the presence of any lagged effect. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Comparison of these two regions showed a significant difference between them. The meteorological variables of the regions that affect SP development were found to be low mean minimum temperature, high daily temperature change, low precipitation, low wind speed and north winds for Erzurum, and only rainy days for Çanakkale. The results have demonstrated that cold weather, sudden temperature changes, north winds, and low wind speed are risk factors for the development of SP at high altitudes.


Subject(s)
Pneumothorax , Altitude , Atmospheric Pressure , Humans , Humidity , Meteorological Concepts , Meteorology , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Seasons , Temperature , Weather , Wind
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(10): 2055-2059, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33142174

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and shock index (SI) are considered valuable predictors of hospital outcome and mortality in various operative and intensive care settings. In the present study, we evaluated the prognostic capabilities of these parameters for performing emergency department (ED) triage, as represented by the emergency severity index (ESI). METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study included 367 patients aged older than 18 years who visited the ED of a tertiary referral hospital. The ESI triage levels with PPI, SI, and other basic vital sign parameters were recorded for each patient. The hospital outcome of the patients at the end of the ED period, such as discharge, admission to the hospital and death were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients (M/F: 178/189) admitted to the ED were categorized according to ESI and included in the study. A decrease in diastolic BP, SpO2 and PPI increased the likelihood of hospitalization and 30-day mortality. Based on univariate analysis, a significant improvement in performance was found by using age, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, SpO2, SI and PPI in terms of predicting high acuity level patients (ESI < 3). In the multivariable analysis only SpO2 and PPI were found to predict ESI < 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Peripheral perfusion index and SI as novel triage instruments might provide useful information for predicting hospital admission and mortality in ED patients. The addition of these parameters to existing triage instruments such as ESI could enhance the triage specificity in unselected patients admitted to ED.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Perfusion Index/standards , Prognosis , Shock/classification , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/trends , Perfusion Index/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Shock/mortality
15.
Intern Emerg Med ; 12(1): 91-97, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27001885

ABSTRACT

The aim of the this study is to evaluate the intubation success rates of emergency medical technicians using a Macintosh laryngoscope (ML), McCoy laryngoscope (MCL), and C MAC D-Blade (CMDB) video laryngoscope on manikin models with immobilized cervical spines. This randomized crossover study included 40 EMTs with at least 2 years' active service in ambulances. All participating technicians completed intubations in three scenarios-a normal airway model, a rigid cervical collar model, and a manual in-line cervical stabilization model-with three different laryngoscopes. The scenario and laryngoscope model were determined randomly. We recorded the scenario, laryngoscope method, intubation time in seconds, tooth pressure, and intubation on a previously prepared study form. We performed Friedman tests to determine whether there is a significant change in the intubation success rate, duration of tracheal intubation, tooth pressure, and visual analog scale scores due to violations of parametric test assumptions. We performed the Wilcoxon test to determine the significance of pairwise differences for multiple comparisons. An overall 5 % type I error level was used to infer statistical significance. We considered a p value of less than 0.05 statistically significant. The CMDB and MCL success rates were significantly higher than the ML rates in all scenario models (p < 0.05). The CMDB intubation duration was significantly shorter when compared with ML and MCL in all models. CMDB and MCL may provide an easier, faster intubation by prehospital emergency health care workers in patients with immobilized cervical spines.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopes/standards , Video-Assisted Surgery/methods , Adult , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design/standards , Female , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Laryngoscopes/statistics & numerical data , Male , Manikins , Simulation Training/methods , Simulation Training/statistics & numerical data , Video-Assisted Surgery/standards , Video-Assisted Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Workforce
16.
Pak J Med Sci ; 31(5): 1110-4, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26648996

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate early diagnostic effects of serum myelin basic protein (MBP) and ischemic modified albumin (IMA) levels in patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: Fifty patients who presented to an emergency service with acute ischemic stroke between June 2013 to March 2014 were evaluated with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty four healthy cases were included as control group. All patients' serum IMA and MBP level were assessed. RESULTS: Mean IMA value was 0.52±0.25 cases with acute ischemic stroke and serum IMA levels were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.01). No statistical significance was observed between acute ischemic stroke group and control group related to the MBP serum levels (P>0.05). Statistically significant correlation was detected between the volumes of diffusion restriction on MRI and NIHSS score (P=0.002, r=0.43) and IMA (P=0.015, r=0.344) levels. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that serum IMA levels are elevated in acute ischemic stroke cases and these levels are correlated with the ischemic tissue volume. MBP levels do not increase in early period of stroke cases.

17.
Med Glas (Zenica) ; 11(1): 105-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24496349

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the usage of inspiration, expiration, cough, and heel drop jarring tests that are applied for determination of peritonism in cases with acute abdominal pain. METHODS: A prospective study based on observation of patients between 16-65 years of age and presented to the Emergency Department within a 3-month period starting from June 2007, was conducted. The patients were asked to rate their pain level between "0" and "10". Following the measurement of the vital signs, 4 tests were conducted by an emergency medicine resident. The medical records of all the patients were reviewed after 3 months. Data concerning clinical diagnosis, hospital admission and discharge processes, and surgical results, were all recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients had peritonism tests performed. Inspiration test was positive in 29 (of 51, 56.9%) patients admitted to the hospital. However, there was no correlation between the cases admitted to the hospital and the other 3 tests (p more than 0.05). Twenty-one (of 34, 61.8%) patients which have been subjected to surgical treatment, showed positive inspiration test results. Surgical treatment was performed on nine (of 11, 81.8%) patients who showed positive results for all 4 tests. CONCLUSION: The applied tests are helpful in determining a serious abdominal disease, particularly alongside findings of rebound, tenderness, and laboratory results.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Peritoneal Diseases/complications , Peritoneal Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Examination , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
18.
Surg Today ; 44(11): 2072-6, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24337529

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examined the feasibility of using the serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) level for the early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia, and investigated whether it contributes to the clinical decision-making process. METHOD: Thirty patients diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia, 27 patients with other types of acute abdomen who presented with acute abdomen symptoms but were not diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia, and 20 healthy people were included in the study. Mesenteric ischemia was confirmed by a pathological evaluation in patients who underwent intestinal resection due to detection of mesenteric ischemia during surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the leukocyte counts and D-dimer levels between subjects with mesenteric ischemia and acute abdomen due to other causes (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the serum I-FABP level between these groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The I-FABP level is a more reliable parameter for diagnosing acute mesenteric ischemia compared to leukocytosis and D-dimer elevation.


Subject(s)
Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins/blood , Mesenteric Ischemia/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Mesenteric Ischemia/surgery , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Case Rep Emerg Med ; 2013: 258421, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23606996

ABSTRACT

Insect stings belonging to Hymenoptera defined as wasps, yellow jackets, bees, or hornets by human usually result in unserious clinical pictures that go with pain. Rhabdomyolysis following a bee sting is a rare condition. This paper emphasizes "rhabdomyolysis" as a rare complication of this frequently observed envenomation. Rare but severe clinical results may occur due to multiple bee stings, such as intravascular hemolysis, rhabdomyolysis, acute renal insufficiency, and hepatic dysfunction. In bee stings as in our case, clinicians should be alert for rhabdomyolysis in cases with generalized body and muscle pain. Early onset alkaline diuresis and management in patients with rhabdomyolysis are vital in protecting the renal functions and preventing morbidity and mortality.

20.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 62(2): 129-33, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22755373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the etiologic and demographic characteristics of acute adult poisoning cases and to obtain up-to-date information on acute poisonings. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate 1254 adults who presented with acute poisoning to the Emergency Department of our tertiary care university hospital in central Turkey from January 2007 to December 2009. The data extracted from each chart related to age, gender, marital status, agent involved in the poisoning, season of event, route of poisoning, time between ingestion or exposure and arrival at the casualty ward, mechanism of toxic exposure (unintentional or intentional), level of consciousness, length of stay in the ward, and outcome. RESULTS: Acute poisonings comprised 1.40% of Emergency Department patients; 65% were female, while 47% were between the ages of 16 and 25 years. Medicinal drugs were the most common cause of poisonings (68%), followed by gases (9.5%). Antidepressants were the most frequent drug ingested (18%), followed by analgesics (16%). Intentional poisonings constituted the majority of cases (78%). Most suicide attempts were made by women (68%) and majority of the patients were married (57%). Twenty patients (1.6%) died during their hospital stay, with organophosphate pesticides being the most common agent (n = 8) involved in fatal poisonings. CONCLUSION: Pharmaceutical agents, carbon monoxide and pesticides are the three most common poisoning agents. Deliberate self-poisoning is common in adults in the area of the study; the risk being highest in females and younger adults. These up-to-date data provide important information on the characteristics of acute poisonings and can guide activities such as professional training, preventive measures, community education and new research.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Poisoning/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , Turkey , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...