An Enhanced Spine Model Validated for Simulating Dynamic Lifting Tasks in OpenSim.

A fully articulated thoracolumbar spine model had been previously developed in OpenSim and had been extensively validated against experimental data during various static tasks. In the present study, we enhanced this detailed musculoskeletal model by adding the role of passive structures and adding kinematic constraints to make it suitable for dynamic tasks. We validated the spinal forces estimated by this enhanced model during nine dynamic lifting/lowering tasks. Moreover, we recently developed and evaluated five approaches in OpenSim to model the external loads applied to the hands during lifting/lowering tasks, and in the present study, we assessed which approach results in more accurate spinal forces. Regardless of the external load modeling approach, the maximum forces predicted by our enhanced spine model across all tasks, as well as the pattern of estimated spinal forces within each task, showed strong correlations (r-values and cross-correlation coefficients > 0.9) with experimental data. Given the biofidelity of our enhanced model, its accessibility via the open-source OpenSim software, and the extent to which this model has been validated, we recommend it for applications requiring estimation of spinal forces during lifting/lowering tasks using multibody-based models and inverse dynamic analyses.

Evaluation of spinal force normalization techniques.

Division normalization is commonly used in biomechanics studies to remove the effect of anthropometric differences (e.g., body weight) on kinetic variables, facilitating comparison across a population. In spine biomechanics, spinal forces are commonly divided by the body weight or the intervertebral load during a standing posture. However, it has been suggested that offset and power curve normalization are more appropriate than division normalization for normalizing kinetic variables such as ground reaction forces during walking and running. The present study investigated, for the first time, the effectiveness of four techniques for normalizing spinal forces to remove the effect of body weight. Spinal forces at all lumbar levels were estimated using a detailed OpenSim musculoskeletal model of the spine for 11 scaled models (50-100 kg) and during 13 trunk flexion tasks. Pearson correlations of raw and normalized forces against body weight were used to assess the effectiveness of each normalization technique. Body weight and standing division normalization could only successfully normalize L4L5 spinal forces in three tasks, and L5S1 loads in five and three tasks, respectively; however, offset and power curve normalization techniques were successful across all lumbar spine levels and all tasks. Offset normalization successfully removed the effect of body weight and maintained the influence of flexion angle on spinal forces. Thus, we recommend offset normalization to account for anthropometric differences in studies of spinal forces.

A data-driven framework for assessing soldier performance, health, and survivability.

Presented is a framework that uses pattern classification methods to incrementally morph whole-body movement patterns to investigate how personal (sex, military experience, and body mass) and load characteristics affect the survivability tradespace: performance, musculoskeletal health, and susceptibility to enemy action. Sixteen civilians and 12 soldiers performed eight military-based movement patterns under three body-borne loads: ∼5.5 kg, ∼22 kg, and ∼38 kg. Our framework reduces dimensionality using principal component analysis and uses linear discriminant analysis to classify groups and morph movement patterns. Our framework produces morphed whole-body movement patterns that emulate previously published changes to the survivability tradespace caused by body-borne loads. Additionally, we identified that personal characteristics can greatly impact the tradespace when carrying heavy body-borne loads. Using our framework, military leaders can make decisions based on objective information for armour procurement, employment of armour, and battlefield performance, which can positively impact operational readiness and increase overall mission success.