Value of diffusion-weighted images in diagnosis of locoregionally recurrent rectal tumors.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the value of referring to Diffusion-weighted images in evaluation of T2-weighted images of patients clinically suspicious of locoregional rectal cancer recurrence. METHODS: After ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained, 37 consecutive patients (male/female of 22/15; mean age 56 ± 13.5 SD) clinically suspicious of recurrent rectal tumor were prospectively included in the study over a two-year period. T2-weighted images of the patients were reviewed and the results were recorded. Right after that, the corresponding DWI images were provided for the radiologist and new ratings were given to the patients after taking into account the DWI findings. Finally, the patients underwent tissue biopsy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the "T2-weighted alone" and "T2-weighted + DWI" methods were calculated and compared. RESULTS: "T2-weighted alone" and "T2-weighted + DWI" methods had an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.88), respectively. The Difference between the two AUCs was 0.11 (P = 0.16). In the subgroup of patients having equivocal ratings in T2-weighted images, DWI images correctly identified 81% (13/16) of patients with true tumor recurrence and 66% (8/12) of patients without recurrence. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that referring to DWI does not significantly change the overall diagnostic performance of T2-weighted images. However, DWI is of great value in evaluation of the subgroup of patients with equivocal findings in T2-weighted images. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: When T2-weighted images are equivocal, DWI images may be helpful in evaluation of patients with suspected locoregional recurrence of rectal tumor.

CT features of toxic megacolon: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Toxic megacolon is a rare but life-threatening condition. Diagnosis is made when both systemic toxicity and an enlarged colon are present. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to provide a list of toxic megacolon findings on computed tomography (CT) imaging along with the prevalence rate for each finding. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched. After eligibility screening and quality assessment, the reported CT findings of toxic megacolon with their respective prevalence rates were extracted from the included studies. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated for each finding using random-effects model and inverse variance method. I2 statistics were used to estimate the heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were performed using R software. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Database search yielded a total of 122 records. Only 2 of these studies were finally selected following two-step eligibility screening. Most common CT features of toxic megacolon and their pooled prevalence rates [95% CI] were: colonic distension (reported in 100% of patients), abnormal haustration 96% [0.75-0.99], peri-colonic fat stranding 87% [0.29-0.99], nodular pseudo polyps 76% [0.52-0.91], multilayered appearance of colonic wall 58% [0.38-0.76], and ascites 57% [0.21-0.87]. Other reported CT features: colonic wall thickening, pleural effusion, accordion sign, small bowel/gastric distension, and segmental colonic wall thinning. CONCLUSION: and implication for practice: Colonic distension can be accompanied by 10 other findings in CT images of patients with toxic megacolon. Although these findings are not specific, toxic megacolon should be included in the list of differential diagnoses when these findings are present.