Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: a Western-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging is the central gastric cancer (GC) staging system, but it has some disadvantages. However, the lymph node ratio (LNR) can be used regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy and is considered an important prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients who underwent curative GC surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent radical gastric surgery between January 2014 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological features of tumors, TNM stage, and survival rates were analyzed. LNR was defined as the ratio between metastatic lymph nodes and total lymph nodes removed. The LNR groups were classified as follows: LNR0 = 0, 0.01 < LNR1 ≤ 0.1, 0.1 < LNR2 ≤ 0.25 and LNR3 > 0.25. Tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the patients were compared between LNR groups. RESULTS: After exclusion, 333 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 62 ± 14 years. According to the LNR classification, no difference was found between groups regarding age and sex. However, TNM stage III disease was significantly more common in LNR3 patients. Most patients (43.2%, n = 144) were in the LNR3 group. In terms of tumor characteristics (lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion), the LNR3 group had significantly poorer prognostic factors. The Cox regression model defined LNR3, TNM stage II-III disease, and advanced age as independent risk factors for survival. Patients with LNR3 demonstrated the lowest 5-year OS rate (35.7%) (estimated mean survival was 30 ± 1.9 months) compared to LNR 0-1-2. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that a high LNR was significantly associated with poor OS in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. LNR can be used as an independent prognostic predictor in GC patients.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-sparing rectal cancer surgery. Incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUNDS: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) was defined with symptoms such as frequency, incontinence, urgency, and constipation in patients who underwent Sphincter-Sparing Rectum Surgery (SSRC). In this study, LARS rates and risk factors of the patients who underwent SSRC were Investigated. MATERIAL METHOD: The medical records of patients with SSRC at general surgery department were examined retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, neo/adjuvant chemo-radiotherapies, distal resection levels, open/laparoscopic procedures, postoperative complications, and pathological outcomes were recorded. LARS scoring system defined by Emmertsen and Laurberg was used to calculate LARS scores. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 129. The rectal resection was performed by either low anterior resection (LAR) or very low anterior resection (VLAR). VLAR was used to specify that had anastomosis <5cm to the anal verge. The median follow-up time was 12 (1-30) months. LARS were detected in 60 (%47) patients. LARS rates were significantly higher in the patients underwent VLAR (n: 35 9% vs. 48%<0,001). In univariate analysis, the level of distal resection, open surgeries, neoadjuvant RT, and diversion with temporary stoma were significantly different in LARS group. However, in multivariate analysis, distal resection level was the only significant risk factor for LARS. CONCLUSION: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) was frequently seen in patients who underwent sphincter-sparing rectum surgery (SSRS). It was detected that distal resection levels were the most important risk factor for the development of LARS. This result showed that LARS should not be disregarded in patients underwent SSRS. KEY WORDS: Bowel Disfunction, Cancer, Incontinence, LARS, Rectum.

Factors Predicting Surgical Treatment in Patients with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Retrospective Single-centre Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors which predict treatment strategy in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: General Surgery Clinic, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey, between January 2016 and December 2020. METHODOLOGY: Data of the patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) was retrospectively collected. The demographic characteristics and laboratory findings were evaluated. Patients, who underwent conservative treatment and surgical intervention, were compared. Differences between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores, and neutrophil (NEU)-to-lymphocyte (LYM) ratio (NLR), were evaluated. RESULTS: One-hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the study. Seventy-four (54%) of the patients had conservative treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between the surgical and conservative treatment groups according to the age, gender, and ASA score (p=0.77, 0.21 and 0.95 respectively). The patients with congenital aetiology and low PNI scores were in significantly higher numbers among the surgical treatment group (p <0.001 and p=0.004, respectively). In patients, who underwent surgery, the resection rate was found significantly higher in older age (63 vs. 52, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with low PNI scores and congenital adhesive small bowel obstruction undergo operative treatment more frequently than conservative treatment. Future studies focusing on diagnostic scores to predict early surgery in ASBO patients may include these variables. KEY WORDS: Adhesive small bowel obstruction, PNI, Treatment strategy, Surgery.