Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 45
Filter
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 29(8): 970-980, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37523315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mortality, morbidity, health care utilization, and cost attributable to vaccine-preventable diseases are substantial for those aged 50 years and older. Although vaccination is the most cost-effective strategy to prevent common infectious diseases in older adults, vaccination rates remain below US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention benchmarks, especially among racial minorities. Historical mistrust, structural racism within the US medical system, and misinformation contributed to lower immunization rates among minorities, especially Black Americans. To address the critical need to increase knowledge and trust in vaccination, 2 community-based educational interventions were tested: a pharmacist-led didactic session (PHARM) and a peer-led educational workshop (PEER). OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the effectiveness and costs of PEER and PHARM community-based education models in improving knowledge and trust in vaccinations. METHODS: The Motivating Older adults to Trust Information about Vaccines And Their Effects (MOTIVATE) study was a cluster-randomized trial conducted in the greater Delaware Valley Region sites from 2017 to 2020. The included sites (7 senior centers, 3 housing units, 1 church, and 1 neighborhood family center) predominantly served Black communities. Participants were randomized to either PHARM or PEER sessions covering influenza, pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster, and beliefs related to vaccines. Peer leaders facilitated smaller workshops (5-10 participants), whereas pharmacists conducted larger didactic lectures with 15-43 participants. Outcomes were captured through a self-administered survey at baseline, postprogram, and 1 month after the program. Intervention costs were measured in 2017 US dollars. RESULTS: 287 participants were included. Their mean age was 74.5 years (SD = 8.94), 80.5% were women, 64.2% were Black, and 48.1% completed some college. Knowledge scores within groups for all 3 diseases significantly increased postprogram for both PEER and PHARM and were sustained at 1 month. Between-group knowledge differences were significant only for influenza (PEER participants had significantly larger improvement vs PHARM). Vaccination trust significantly increased in both groups. Total program costs were $11,411 for PEER and $5,104 for PHARM. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions significantly improved knowledge and trust toward vaccination and retained their effect 1 month after the program. The 2 effective community-based education models should be expanded to ensure timely and trusted information is available to educate older adults about vaccine-preventable diseases. Further research is encouraged to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of these models' utilization on a larger scale. DISCLOSURES: Dr Schafer is an employee of Merck; however, at the time of the project, he was a professor at Thomas Jefferson University. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was supported in part by a research grant from the Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. The sponsor played no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the article. Study Registration Number: NCT03239665.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Pharmacists , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Trust , Vaccination
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(6): 1516-1525, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36732436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physicians treating similar patients in similar care-delivery contexts vary in the intensity of life-extending care provided to their patients at the end-of-life. Physician psychological propensities are an important potential determinant of this variability, but the pertinent literature has yet to be synthesized. OBJECTIVE: Conduct a review of qualitative studies to explicate whether and how psychological propensities could result in some physicians providing more intensive treatment than others. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in five major electronic databases-MEDLINE ALL (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley)-to identify eligible studies (earliest available date to August 2021). Eligibility criteria included examination of a physician psychological factor as relating to end-of-life care intensity in advanced life-limiting illness. Findings from individual studies were pooled and synthesized using thematic analysis, which identified common, prevalent themes across findings. RESULTS: The search identified 5623 references, of which 28 were included in the final synthesis. Seven psychological propensities were identified as influencing physician judgments regarding whether and when to withhold or de-escalate life-extending treatments resulting in higher treatment intensity: (1) professional identity as someone who extends lifespan, (2) mortality aversion, (3) communication avoidance, (4) conflict avoidance, (5) personal values favoring life extension, (6) decisional avoidance, and (7) over-optimism. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological propensities could influence physician judgments regarding whether and when to de-escalate life-extending treatments. Future work should examine how individual and environmental factors combine to create such propensities, and how addressing these propensities could reduce physician-attributed variation in end-of-life care intensity.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Terminal Care , Humans , Communication , Death , Pharmaceutical Preparations
3.
Death Stud ; 47(10): 1136-1145, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695284

ABSTRACT

Elisabeth Kübler-Ross' pioneering work focused on dying, yet some clinicians persist in prescribing it as a path through grief. We surveyed 964 mental health clinicians who completed a five-section mixed methods survey: two sections assessed knowledge with multiple choice questions and a case study to assess clinicians' knowledge-base and approach to grief/loss in practice. Analysis of four items related to Kübler-Ross' model and 66/962 case studies indicates ongoing use of "stages" and Kübler-Ross' model. Only 330 (34.2%) of the clinicians were deemed knowledgeable; 462 (47.9%) were questionable; and 172 (17.9%) were misinformed, continuing to use Kübler-Ross' stage theory for grief.


Subject(s)
Health Workforce , Professional Practice Gaps , Humans , Grief , Health Personnel
4.
Inform Health Soc Care ; 47(3): 295-304, 2022 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672856

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many individuals with depression are not being linked to treatment by their primary care providers. Electronic health records (EHRs) are common in medicine, but their impact on depression treatment is mixed. Because EHRs are diverse, differences may be attributable to differences in functionality. This study examines the relationship between EHR functions, and patterns of depression treatment in primary care. METHODS: secondary analyses from the 2013-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey examined adult primary care patients with new or acute depression (n = 5,368). Bivariate comparisons examined patterns of depression treatment by general EHR use, and logistic regression examined the impact of individual EHR functions on treatment receipt. RESULTS: Half the sample (57%; N = 3,034) was linked to depression treatment. Of this, 98.5% (n = 2,985) were prescribed antidepressants, while 4.3% (n = 130) were linked to mental health. EHR use did not impact mental health linkages, but EHR functions did affect antidepressant prescribing. Medication reconciliation decreased the odds of receiving an antidepressant (OR = .60, p < .05), while contraindication warnings increased the likelihood of an antidepressant prescription (OR = 1.91, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: EHR systems did not impact mental health linkages but improved rates of antidepressant prescribing. Optimizing the use of contraindication warnings may be a key mechanism to encourage antidepressant treatment.


Subject(s)
Depression , Electronic Health Records , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Humans , Primary Health Care
5.
Health Serv Res ; 56(3): 418-431, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This article employs a best-worst scaling (BWS) experiment to identify the claims-based outcomes that matter most to patients and other relevant parties when evaluating pediatric antipsychotic monitoring programs in the United States. DATA SOURCES: Patients and relevant parties, with pediatric antipsychotic oversight and treatment experience, completed a BWS experiment, including policymakers (n = 31), foster care alumni (n = 28), caseworkers (n = 23), prescribing clinicians (n = 32), and caregivers (n = 18). STUDY DESIGN: Respondents received surveys with a scenario on antipsychotic monitoring programs and ranked 11 candidate claims-based outcomes as most and least important for program evaluation. DATA ANALYSIS: Stratified by respondent group, best-worst scores were calculated to identify the relative importance of the claims-based outcomes. A conditional logit examined whether candidate outcomes for safety, quality, and unintended consequences were preferred over reduction in antipsychotic treatment, the outcome used most often to evaluate antipsychotic monitoring programs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Safety indicators (eg, antipsychotic co-pharmacy, cross-class polypharmacy, higher than recommended doses) ranked among the top three candidate outcomes across respondent groups and were an important complement to antipsychotic treatment reduction. Foster care alumni prioritized "antipsychotic treatment reduction" and "increased psychosocial treatment." Caseworkers, prescribers, and caregivers prioritized "increased follow-up after treatment initiation." Potential unintended consequences of an antipsychotic monitoring program ranked lowest, including increased use of other psychotropic medication classes (as a substitute), increased psychiatric hospital stays, and increased emergency room utilization. Results of the conditional logit model found only caregivers significantly preferred other indicators over antipsychotic treatment reduction, preferring improvements in follow-up care (5.78) and psychosocial treatment (4.53) and reduction in prescriptions of higher than recommended doses (3.64). CONCLUSIONS: The BWS experiment supported rank ordering of candidate claims-based outcomes demonstrating the opportunity for future studies to align outcomes used in antipsychotic monitoring program evaluations with community preferences, specifically by diversifying metrics to include safety and quality indicators.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Caregivers/psychology , Child , Counseling/organization & administration , Drug Monitoring/standards , Foster Home Care/psychology , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Safety/standards , Program Evaluation , Social Workers/psychology , United States
6.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 8(3): 704-711, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729106

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to describe racial differences in type 2 diabetes mellitus "diabetes" control among the adults in the USA, and to examine attributes that may exacerbate racial differences. Secondary analyses of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) collected in years 2012-2014 in the USA. Study sample was limited to White or African American patients aged 25 or older and living with diabetes (n = 4106). Outcome measure, poor diabetes control, was based on lab values for HbA1c (> 7%). Covariates include demographics, insurance, comorbid conditions, and continuity of care and location (urban vs. rural). Overall, African Americans have 33% higher odds of poor diabetes control compared with Whites. Adjusted probability of poor diabetes control was 48% overall, 65% for African American women and 69% for African Americans living in rural areas. African Americans continue to have poorer diabetes control compared to Whites. This difference is exacerbated for African American women, and for all African Americans living in rural areas. Policy should include concentrated screening and treatment resources for African Americans in rural settings.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Health Status Disparities , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Geography/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Race Factors , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
7.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 16(11): 1661-1671, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common type of bariatric surgery performed in the United States and may be performed on an outpatient basis. Limited literature exists comparing outcomes of outpatient and inpatient LSG, and study results are conflicting. OBJECTIVES: To compare safety and utilization outcomes of outpatient versus inpatient LSG. SETTINGS: Retrospective, multihospital database study (Optum Pan-Therapeutics Database). METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who underwent LSG between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, were identified from the Optum Pan-Therapeutics Database and classified as having undergone outpatient or inpatient surgery. Nearest neighbor propensity score matching and generalized estimating equations accounting for procedural physician-level clustering were used to compare the following outcomes between outpatient and inpatient LSG: all-cause 30-day patient morbidity, hospital readmission, readmission length of stay, bariatric reoperation. and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 22,945 patients (outpatient: 1542; inpatient: 21,403) meeting the study inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, the inpatient and outpatient groups contained 1542 and 13,903 patients, respectively. Bariatric reoperation (n = 13) and mortality (n = 5) were rare events occurring in <.1% of all cases. Compared with the inpatient group, the outpatient group had a statistically significant lower readmission length of stay (4.63 versus 3.23 days; P = .0057). Otherwise, there was no significant association between procedure setting and 30-day overall morbidity (4.8% versus 5.3%; P = .5775) or hospital readmission (2.6% versus 2.1%; P = .1841). CONCLUSIONS: Safety and utilization outcomes were similar between outpatient and inpatient LSG, and outpatient LSG was associated with shorter hospital readmission length of stay.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Gastrectomy , Humans , Inpatients , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Outpatients , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
8.
Health Serv Res ; 55(4): 596-603, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32567089

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior authorization of prescription medications is a policy tool that can potentially impact care quality and patient safety. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a mandatory peer-review program in reducing antipsychotic prescriptions among Medicaid-insured children, accounting for secular trends that affected antipsychotic prescribing nationally. DATA SOURCE: Medicaid Analytical eXtracts (MAX) with administrative claims for health services provided between January 2006 and December 2011. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, observational study examined prescription claims records from Washington State (Washington) and compared them to a synthetic control drawing from 20 potential donor states that had not implemented any antipsychotic prior authorization program or mandatory peer review for Medicaid-insured children during the study period. This method provided a means to control for secular trends by simulating the antipsychotic use trajectory that the program state would have been expected to experience in the absence of the policy implementation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Before the policy implementation, antipsychotic use prevalence closely tracked those of the synthetic control (6.17 per 1000 in Washington vs. 6.21 in the synthetic control group). Within two years after the policy was implemented, prevalence decreased to 4.04 in Washington and remained stable in the synthetic control group (6.47), corresponding to an approximately 38% decline. CONCLUSION: Prior authorization program designs and implementations vary widely. This mandatory peer-review program, with an authorization window and two-stage rollout, was effective in moving population level statistics toward safe and judicious use of antipsychotic medications in children.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/standards , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Medicaid/standards , Peer Review/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prescription Drugs/standards , Prior Authorization/standards , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/diet therapy , Prescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Prior Authorization/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , United States , Washington
9.
Gerontologist ; 60(1): 22-31, 2020 01 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite enthusiasm for the potential cost savings of embedding supportive services in senior housing, few population health studies have empirically examined such associations. We investigated the extent to which associations between housing plus services in senior housing and healthcare expenditures depend upon residents' instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) impairment and the level of services available. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from 2,601 participants aged 65 or older in the 2001-2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, who reported living in senior or retirement housing. Based on survey self-reports, we created a measure of housing with different levels of services, including the categories of housing without services, housing plus services (i.e., assistance with IADLs, but not with medications), and housing plus enhanced services (i.e., assistance with IADLs including medications). Administrative and survey data were used to create measures of healthcare expenditures paid by all sources. We estimated generalized linear models based on pooled data from participants across the 13 years of data collection. RESULTS: Residents with IADL impairment-who lived in housing plus enhanced services-had lower total healthcare expenditures than their counterparts in housing without services and housing plus services. Upon examining component healthcare costs, this pattern of results was similar for inpatient/subacute care, as well as ambulatory care, but not for home health care. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings indicate the importance of studies on the cost savings of housing-based service programs to consider resident IADL status and the types of services available.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services/economics , Housing for the Elderly/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost Savings , Female , Humans , Male , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
10.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 59(1): 166-176.e3, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31071384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about whether interventions implemented by specialized Medicaid managed care organizations (MMCOs) contributed to recent stabilization of antipsychotic prescribing to youths in foster care. This study examined a multimodal antipsychotic intervention implemented by a specialized MMCO for youths in foster care with routine mental health screening, health passports, elective psychiatric consultation line, and retrospective drug utilization reviews to determine whether this multimodal intervention significantly reduced antipsychotic dispensing for youths with conditions without US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications. METHOD: Employing a difference-in-differences design, intervention effectiveness for youths in foster care (age 6-17 years) compared with adopted youthss was examined. Analyses were stratified by FDA-indicated conditions, other externalizing conditions, and other internalizing conditions. Outcomes included predicted annual probabilities of any antipsychotic dispensed, antipsychotic dispensed for ≥90 consecutive days, and glucose and lipid testing. RESULTS: Intervention-enrolled youths with FDA-indicated conditions, relative to comparison youths, experienced a 0.6% reduction in any antipsychotic dispensed and 3.1% increase for ≥90 consecutive days dispensed in the 2 years following implementation, both nonsignificant differences. Youths with other externalizing disorders experienced significant reductions, relative to comparison youths, in any antipsychotic dispensed (-6.3%, p < .001) and in ≥90 consecutive days dispensed (-5.5%, p < .001). Youths with other internalizing disorders experienced a significant reduction, relative to comparison youths, in any antipsychotic dispensed (-7.6%, p < .001) and in ≥90 consecutive days dispensed (-5.1%, p < .001). Glucose and lipid testing increased at statistically comparable rates for both groups. CONCLUSION: MMCO implementation significantly reduced antipsychotic medications without FDA-indicated conditions prescribed to youths, while not significantly affecting antipsychotic medications prescribed to youths with FDA-indicated conditions.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Foster Home Care , Managed Care Programs , Medicaid , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
11.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 75(6): 1286-1291, 2020 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613360

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Drawing on insights from theorizing on cumulative dis/advantage (CDA), we aimed to advance understanding of educational attainment as a protective factor for later-life cognition by examining whether associations between obtaining a bachelor's degree and later-life cognition differ according to individuals' likelihood of completing college based on characteristics in adolescence. METHODS: We conducted a propensity score analysis with data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS). Measures to predict college completion were assessed prospectively in adolescence, and a global measure of later-life cognition was based on cognitive assessments at age 65. RESULTS: College completion by age 25 (vs high school only) was associated with better later-life cognition for both men and women. Among men specifically, associations were stronger for those who were less likely as adolescents to complete college. DISCUSSION: Results indicate the utility of a CDA perspective for investigating the implications of interconnected early life risk and protective factors for later-life cognition, as well as ways in which college education can both contribute to, as well as mitigate, processes of CDA.


Subject(s)
Academic Success , Cognition , Cognitive Aging/psychology , College Admission Test/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Universities/statistics & numerical data , Academic Performance/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Aged , Correlation of Data , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Propensity Score , Protective Factors , Sex Factors , Social Class , United States/epidemiology
12.
Psychiatr Serv ; 68(7): 660-666, 2017 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196461

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Despite high prevalence rates of depression in primary care, depressive symptoms are often undetected by physicians. Screening for depression is now recommended as a part of routine primary care; however, recent estimates of rates and patterns of depression screening are lacking in the literature. This study examined national rates and patterns of depression screening among visits to office-based primary care physicians. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from the 2012 and 2013 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was conducted. The sample consisted of 33,653 physician-patient encounters. RESULTS: The overall rate of depression screening was 4.2%. African Americans were half as likely to be screened compared with whites, and elderly patients were half as likely to be screened compared with middle-aged patients. Patients with a chronic condition were more likely than patients without a chronic condition to receive depression screening, and the likelihood of being screened increased with each additional chronic condition. Providers who had fully adopted electronic health records (EHRs) were more likely to screen for depression compared with providers who used paper charts. Screening rates were not associated with providers' intentions to participate in the federal program that provides financial incentives for the meaningful use of certified EHRs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall rates of depression screening were low. Current screening practices may exacerbate existing disparities in depression care. EHR systems may be an effective tool to improve screening rates.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
13.
Psychiatr Serv ; 67(4): 391-6, 2016 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26567931

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The quality of mental health care provided by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was compared with care provided to a comparable population treated in the private sector. METHODS: Two cohorts of individuals with mental disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, major depression, and substance use disorders) were created with VA administrative data (N=836,519) and MarketScan data (N=545,484). The authors computed VA and MarketScan national means for seven process-based quality measures related to medication evaluation and management and estimated national-level performance by age and gender. RESULTS: In every case, VA performance was superior to that of the private sector by more than 30%. Compared with individuals in private plans, veterans with schizophrenia or major depression were more than twice as likely to receive appropriate initial medication treatment, and veterans with depression were more than twice as likely to receive appropriate long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate the significant advantages that accrue from an organized, nationwide system of care. The much higher performance of the VA has important clinical and policy implications.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services/standards , Middle Aged , Quality of Health Care/standards , United States , Young Adult
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 50(6): 692-698, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26702478

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic resistance is rapidly spreading, affecting millions of people and costing billions of dollars. Potential factors affecting antibiotic prescription, such as tobacco use, could dramatically influence this public health crisis. The study determined the magnitude of impact that tobacco use has on antibiotic prescribing patterns. METHODS: Pooled data were analyzed in 2015 from the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a cross-sectional survey describing use of ambulatory medical services in the U.S. via healthcare provider-patient encounters. Patients aged >18 years with documented tobacco use status diagnosed with an infection were included (i.e., all encounters in the analysis included an infectious diagnosis of interest). The analytic sample included 8,307 visits, representing 294 million visits nationally. RESULTS: Half (49.9%) of encounters that included any infection had an antibiotic prescribed. Adjusted odds of receiving antibiotics among current tobacco users was 1.20 (95% CI=1.02, 1.42), and even higher for encounters of respiratory infections (AOR=1.31, 95% CI=1.05, 1.62). Antibiotic prescription rates were lower among patients aged >65 years, those with comorbid asthma or cancer, non-whites, and those covered by Medicaid and higher for primary care physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lack of evidence-based rationale, among a national sample of patients with an infectious diagnosis, tobacco users had 20%-30% higher odds of receiving antibiotics than non-tobacco users. This is the first U.S. study to quantify the magnitude of this unsubstantiated practice. Prescribers should understand that tobacco use could be associated with higher antibiotic prescription, which may subsequently increase antimicrobial resistance in the community.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Smoking/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , United States
15.
J Interpers Violence ; 31(9): 1579-96, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25657103

ABSTRACT

This article examines domestic violence among women who participate in microfinance in Bangladesh. Secondary analysis of survey data from nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey was used to investigate the association between microfinance participation and domestic violence of 4,163 ever-married women between the ages of 18 and 49 years. Outcome measure is experience of domestic violence as measured by a modified Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) and predictor variables include microfinance, binary indicator of relatively better economic status, autonomy, decision-making power, and demographic variables. The likelihood of experiencing domestic violence was not found to vary with microfinance participation. However, the interaction effect of microfinance and better economic status was found to be significantly associated with domestic violence (9% increased probability). Experience of domestic violence was negatively associated with older age, higher education of the husband, and autonomy. In Bangladesh, microfinance participation may be associated with a higher probability of experiencing domestic violence for women with relatively better economic status, but not for the poorest of the poor.


Subject(s)
Entrepreneurship/statistics & numerical data , Spouse Abuse/economics , Spouse Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Employment , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
JMIR Med Inform ; 3(3): e30, 2015 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the aim of improving health care processes through health information technology (HIT), the US government has promulgated requirements for "meaningful use" (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) as a condition for providers receiving financial incentives for the adoption and use of these systems. Considerable uncertainty remains about the impact of these requirements on the effective application of EHR systems. OBJECTIVE: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-sponsored Centers for Education and Research in Therapeutics (CERTs) critically examined the impact of the MU policy relating to the use of medications and jointly developed recommendations to help inform future HIT policy. METHODS: We gathered perspectives from a wide range of stakeholders (N=35) who had experience with MU requirements, including academicians, practitioners, and policy makers from different health care organizations including and beyond the CERTs. Specific issues and recommendations were discussed and agreed on as a group. RESULTS: Stakeholders' knowledge and experiences from implementing MU requirements fell into 6 domains: (1) accuracy of medication lists and medication reconciliation, (2) problem list accuracy and the shift in HIT priorities, (3) accuracy of allergy lists and allergy-related standards development, (4) support of safer and effective prescribing for children, (5) considerations for rural communities, and (6) general issues with achieving MU. Standards are needed to better facilitate the exchange of data elements between health care settings. Several organizations felt that their preoccupation with fulfilling MU requirements stifled innovation. Greater emphasis should be placed on local HIT configurations that better address population health care needs. CONCLUSIONS: Although MU has stimulated adoption of EHRs, its effects on quality and safety remain uncertain. Stakeholders felt that MU requirements should be more flexible and recognize that integrated models may achieve information-sharing goals in alternate ways. Future certification rules and requirements should enhance EHR functionalities critical for safer prescribing of medications in children.

18.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 42(3): E279-86, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25901390

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To consider psychometric estimates of the validity and reliability of the Spanish translation of a mammography-specific self-efficacy scale. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Three primarily Hispanic churches and a Hispanic community center in a low-income urban area of New Jersey. SAMPLE: 153 low-income Hispanic women aged 40-85 years. METHODS: The translated scale was administered to participants during a six-month period. Internal consistency, reliability, and construct and predictive validity were assessed. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Demographic variables included income and insurance status. Outcome variables included total mammography-specific self-efficacy and having had a mammogram within the past two years. FINDINGS: Preliminary evidence of reliability and validity were found, and predictive validity was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The health needs of specific populations can be addressed only when research instruments have been appropriately validated and all relevant factors are considered. Diverse groups of low-income women face similar challenges and barriers in their efforts to get screened. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses are in an ideal position to help women with preventive care decision making (e.g., screening for breast cancer). Understanding how a woman's level of self-efficacy affects her decision making should be considered when counseling a client.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Mammography/psychology , Poverty/psychology , Self Efficacy , Women/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , New Jersey , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Psychiatr Serv ; 65(10): 1281-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25124057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the extent to which clinical diagnoses of externalizing disorders explain higher rates of antipsychotic use by foster care youths. METHODS: Medicaid claims data from 44 states for 2009 for youths in foster care (N=301,894) and those not in foster care (N=5,092,574) were analyzed, excluding those with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism, and major depressive disorder. Logistic regressions assessed the relationship between foster care, externalizing disorders, and antipsychotic use. RESULTS: Foster care youths had higher rates of externalizing disorders than the comparison group (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, 17.3% versus 6.5%; disruptive behavior disorder, 7.2% versus 2.5%; conduct disorder, 2.3% versus .5%) and greater antipsychotic use (7.4% versus 1.4%). Foster care remained a significant predictor of antipsychotic use after control for demographic and diagnostic covariates, including externalizing disorders (adjusted odds ratio=2.59, 95% confidence interval=2.54-2.63). CONCLUSIONS: High rates of externalizing disorder diagnoses only partially explained elevated levels of antipsychotic use in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Foster Home Care/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Conduct Disorder/drug therapy , Conduct Disorder/psychology , Female , Foster Home Care/psychology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , United States
20.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 75(5): 490-7, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24500284

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study estimates national trends and patterns in use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for adjunctive treatment of nonpsychotic adult depression in office-based practice. METHOD: Twelve consecutive years (1999-2010) of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were analyzed to estimate trends and patterns of adjunctive SGA treatment for adult (≥ 18 years) nonpsychotic depression in office-based visits. Adjunctive SGA use was examined among all office visits in which depression was diagnosed (N = 7,767), excluding visits with diagnoses for alternative SGA indications (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, pervasive development disorder, psychotic depression, dementia) and those without an active antidepressant prescription. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2010, 8.6% of adult depression visits included an SGA. SGA use rates increased from 4.6% in 1999-2000 to 12.5% in 2009-2010, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for time trend of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.84-4.20). The increase in SGA augmentation was broad-based, with no significant differences in time trends between demographic and clinical subgroups. For the most recent survey years (2005-2010), SGA use rates were higher in visits to psychiatrists than to other physicians (AOR = 5.08; 95% CI, 2.96-8.73), visits covered by public than private insurance (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI, 2.25-4.54), visits with diagnosed major depressive disorder than other depressive disorders (AOR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.06), and visits with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular disease (AOR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.12-4.03) and lower in visits by patients > 65 years than 18-44 years (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.82) and visits that included psychotherapy (AOR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Between 1999 and 2010, SGAs were increasingly accepted in the outpatient treatment of adult nonpsychotic depression.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Synergism , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...