Current trends and outcomes in cellular therapy activity in the United States, including prospective Patient Reported Outcomes data collection within the CIBMTR registry.

BACKGROUND: Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prepares an annual set of summary slides to detail the trends in transplantation and cellular therapies. For the first time in the 2023 summary slides, CIBMTR incorporates data for patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) infusions. In addition, the data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is also included. OBJECTIVES: This report aims to update the annual trends in US HCT activity and incorporate data on the use of CAR-T therapies. Here we also aim to present and describe the development, implementation, and current status of the PRO data collection. STUDY DESIGN: In August 2020, CIBMTR launched the Protocol for Collection of Patient Reported Outcomes Data (CIBMTR PRO Protocol). The CIBMTR PRO Protocol operates under a centralized infrastructure to reduce burden to centers. Specifically, PRO data is collected from a prospective convenience sample of adult HCT and CAR-T patients who received treatment at contributing centers and consented for research. Data are merged and stored with the clinical data and used under the governance of the CIBMTR Research Database Protocol. Participants answer a series of surveys developed by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System© (PROMIS) focusing on physical, social and emotional, and others measures assessing financial well-being, occupational functioning, and social determinants of health. To complement traditionally measured clinical outcomes, the surveys are administered at the same timepoints that clinical data is routinely collected. RESULTS: As of September 2023, PRO data from 993 patients across 25 different centers has been collected. With the goal of incorporating these important patient perspectives into standard clinical care, CIBMTR has added the PRO data to Data Back to Centers (DBtC). Through expanding the data types represented in the registry, CIBMTR aims to support holistic research accounting for the patient perspective in improving patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: PRO data at CIBMTR aims to provide the foundation for future large scale, population-level evaluations to determine areas for improvement, emerging disparities in access and health outcomes (eg, by age, race, and ethnicity), and new therapies that may impact current treatment guidelines. Continuing to collect and grow the PRO data is critical for understanding these changes and identifying methods for improving patient quality of life.

Development and initial validation of the AL-PROfile patient-reported outcome measure in light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the AL-PROfile, a patient-reported outcome measure combining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29, two items from PROMIS Cognitive Function, and select Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) items. METHODS: Content validity was assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews of 20 patients who completed the AL-PROfile (Study 1). Study 2 involved 297 participants who completed the AL-PROfile and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (convergent and discriminant validity, known groups validity by stage/organ involvement) were calculated. RESULTS: Study 1 participants found the AL-PROfile straightforward confirming the relevance of the included content. Some felt that certain questions were not related to their amyloidosis experience. Study 2 demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for all domains/items except PROMIS Cognitive Function and acceptable test-retest reliability for all except PROMIS Cognitive Function and PRO-CTCAE nausea. Large correlations were seen for the same domain across measures while correlations for divergent domains within a measure and different domains across different measures were small. The PRO-CTCAE items showed small to medium correlations with each other and with PROMIS and SF-36 domains. Stage was associated with physical function, fatigue, social roles, swelling, and shortness of breath scores. CONCLUSION: The AL-PROfile has acceptable reliability and validity for use in systemic light chain amyloidosis patients.

Differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by disease severity in light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of organ involvement on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. METHODS: PROs were evaluated using the KCCQ-12, PROMIS-29 + 2, and SF-36 in individuals with AL amyloidosis. The 2004 Mayo system was used to stage disease and cardiac, neurologic, and renal involvement was considered. Global physical and mental health (MH) scores, physical function (PF), fatigue, social function (SF), pain, sleep, and MH domains were evaluated. Effect sizes between scores were measured using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Of 297 respondents, the median age at diagnosis was 60 years with 58% cardiac, 58% renal, and 30% neurologic involvement. Fatigue, PF, SF, and global physical health with PROMIS and SF-36 discriminated the most by stage. Significant discrimination in PROMIS and/or SF-36 was seen in PF, fatigue, and global physical health with cardiac involvement. For neurologic involvement, PF, fatigue, SF, pain, sleep, global physical, and MH with PROMIS and role physical, vitality, pain, general health, and physical component summary with SF-36 were discriminatory. For renal amyloid, pain by SF-36 and PROMIS, and SF-36 MH and role emotional subscales were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue, PF, SF, and global physical health can discriminate stage, cardiac and neurologic, but not renal, AL amyloidosis involvement.

A cross-sectional study of patient-reported outcomes and symptom burden using PROMIS and PRO-CTCAE measures in light chain amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a cross-sectional study to characterize health-related quality of life and symptom burden in individuals living with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. METHODS: Members of the Amyloidosis Support Groups, Inc. with AL amyloidosis who consented to this IRB-approved survey provided information on their amyloidosis diagnosis, treatment, symptoms, and functioning. HRQL was measured using PROMIS and PRO-CTCAE questionnaires. RESULTS: Among 297 participants who responded, the median age at diagnosis was 60 years (23-82) with 52% female and 90% white race. There were 69% AL (lambda) and 39% reported 3 or more organs involved with amyloidosis (58% cardiac, 58% renal, 30% neurological AL). Time from diagnosis was less than 2 years in 64 (22%), 2-5 years in 105 (36%), > 5 years in 126 (43%), and unknown in 2 (< 1%) individuals. Therapy included prior chemotherapy in 88% and stem cell transplant in 52%. Fifty percent of the cohort was on active treatment. Multiple domains were impaired in AL amyloidosis compared to the general population, including physical function, fatigue, and social roles. While highest among those within 2 years of diagnosis, high symptom burden was also seen in long-term survivors. A trend to decreased severity and number of impaired symptoms was seen with longer treatment-free interval but many symptoms remained persistent. CONCLUSIONS: Significant and persistent symptom burden is seen in AL amyloidosis. Patient-reported outcomes should be routinely measured and used to provide best supportive care to all AL amyloidosis patients, including long-term survivors and those not on active therapy.

Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Interviews to Inform Measurement of Patient Reported Outcomes After CAR-T.

Toxicities after chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy are well known, yet the patient experience during and after CAR-T therapy has not been well described outside of the trial setting. We explored the patient experience after CAR-T therapy to inform the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measurement approach for the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). We recruited (1) adult patients diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy 14 days to 6 months after receiving a commercial CAR T cell product who had agreed to be contacted by the CIBMTR, (2) caregivers of those patients, and (3) clinical experts in CAR-T therapy. Telephone interviews were conducted following a semistructured guide that included open-ended questions about symptoms and functioning. We conducted a systematic content analysis of each transcript using prespecified codes representing common domains of health, as well as open coding for emergent themes. Forty patients at 29 centers, 15 of their caregivers, and 15 experts from 9 centers participated, representing diversity with respect to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and years in practice (experts). Patients, caregivers, and experts shared largely consistent impressions of the patient experience after CAR-T therapy. Commonly described themes included anxiety, cognitive dysfunction, depression, fatigue, pain, impaired physical function, gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual dysfunction, sleep difficulties, need for support, financial impact, hospitalization, communication with healthcare providers, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Limitations in patients' ability to participate in social roles and activities was the most prevalent theme, found in nearly all interviews. In the setting of CAR-T therapy, a multidimensional approach to PRO measurement is needed that includes physical, mental, and social health, as well as the financial impact of this novel treatment. High-quality existing PRO tools are available to measure these concepts. Results will inform the CIBMTR measurement of PROs after CAR-T therapy and may be applicable to other CAR-T studies that aim to represent patient experiences.

Detection of germline variants using expanded multigene panels in patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend genetic testing for all patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Patients with localized PC who received neoadjuvant therapy between 2009 and 2018 were identified. Genetic consultation (including personal and family history of cancer), genetic testing, and variant data were abstracted. RESULTS: Of 510 patients identified, 163 (32%) underwent genetic counseling and genetic testing was performed in 127 (25%). Patients who underwent genetic testing were younger (median age: 63 vs. 67, p = 0.01). Multi-gene testing was performed in 114 (90%) of 127 patients, targeted gene testing was performed in 8 (6%), and not specified in 5 (4%). Of 127 patients who underwent genetic testing, 20 (16%) had pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants, observed in ATM (n = 7/105,7%), CHEK2 (n = 3/98, 3%), BRCA1 (n = 2/117, 2%), BRCA2 (n = 2/122, 2%), PALB2 (n = 1/115, 1%), MUTYH (n = 1/98, 1%), CDKN2A (n = 1/94, 1%), STK11 (n = 1/97, 1%), NBN (n = 1/98, 1%), and MSH6 (n = 1/97, 1%). Of 20 patients with either a P/LP variant, nine (45%) had a prior cancer, three (15%) had a first-degree relative with PC, and six (30%) had an any-degree relative with PC. CONCLUSION: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 16% of patients who underwent genetic testing, 60% of which occurred in the homologous recombination pathway.

Role of Molecular Profiling of Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Does it Change Practice?

INTRODUCTION: Tumor profiling can improve the selection of oncologic therapies in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on tumor testing is unknown. METHODS: Molecular profiling using commercially available 53-, 315-, or 472-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panels was performed on surgical specimens following neoadjuvant therapy. All specimens with 472-gene sequencing also had immunohistochemical (IHC) testing. Treatment recommendations were based on somatic variants and IHC staining. RESULTS: NGS was performed on 74 patient specimens: 42 (57%) with a 472-gene panel, 28 (38%) with a 315-gene panel, 3 (4%) had 472- and 315-gene panels, and 1 (1%) patient had 53- and 472-gene panels (78 total tests). Likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants were identified in 73 (94%) of the 78 tests. Of the 73 samples with variants identified, 13 (18%) variants were associated with an actionable treatment: ATM (n = 10), BRCA1 (n = 1), PIK3CA (n = 1), and BRCA2 (n = 1). No patient had more than one actionable variant. Based on NGS results, the most commonly recommended therapy was a platinum agent (n = 12/78, 15%). Of the 46 specimens that underwent IHC analysis, overlapping chemotherapeutic treatment recommendations were identified in 40 (87%) specimens. CONCLUSION: Using current multigene NGS panels, actionable variants were identified in 13 (18%) of 74 surgical specimens and primarily involved genes of the DNA repair pathway. Anecdotal reproducibility of test concordance was low.