Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Skin Res Technol ; 28(1): 28-34, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34455619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dry skin is the most common skin problem, especially in the elderly. However, there is no effective instrument to assess dry skin in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the overall dry skin score (ODS-J), the gold standard for dry skin assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 47 patients aged > 65 years. Images of skin on their limbs were captured using a digital camera; both upper and lower limbs were assessed (n = 4/patient). One dermatologist; two wound, ostomy, and continence nurses; and three nursing researchers independently evaluated the images using the ODS-J to assess the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability. Stratum corneum hydration (SCH) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were the external criteria used to verify concurrent and known-groups validity. RESULTS: In total, 182 sites at which the SCH and TEWL could be measured were evaluated for the ODS-J. The ICC for inter-rater reliability of the six raters was 0.939 (p < 0.001). A higher ODS-J was associated with lower SCH (ρ = -0.374; p < 0.001) and lower TEWL (ρ = -0.287; p < 0.001) values. The ODS-J for the lower legs was significantly higher than that of the forearms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ODS-J showed good inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity, and known-groups validity. It can be used by clinical nurses in Japan to observe patients' skin and is an effective indicator for the evaluation of skin care.


Subject(s)
Skin Care , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Japan , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Geriatr Nurs ; 42(6): 1379-1387, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34583237

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effectiveness of weak wiping pressure on skin barrier function and patient satisfaction in comparison to ordinary pressure in hospitalized older adults. Forty-seven participants in a general hospital were blindly and randomly assigned a sequence of two bed baths: wiping three times with weak pressure (12-14 mmHg) and ordinary pressure (23-25 mmHg). Transepidermal water loss and stratum corneum hydration were measured before and after the intervention, and patient satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. Ordinary pressure significantly decreased skin barrier function compared to weak pressure; however, neither of the pressures caused discomfort. Weak pressure was more effective than ordinary pressure in preventing skin disorders and providing satisfaction. Subgroup cluster analysis showed that ordinary pressure was likely to impair the skin barrier function in older adults with diabetes/dyslipidemia and renal dysfunction. The application of weak pressure during bed baths, especially for these patients, is recommended.


Subject(s)
Baths , Water , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...