Editor's Choice - Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.

Incidence and characteristics of distal radial fractures in an urban population in The Netherlands.

The increasing incidence of distal radius fracture is thought to be due to the aging population. Surprisingly, some authors have reported a decrease in the incidence of distal radius fracture. Moreover, the type-specific incidence of distal radial fracture classified according to fracture severity is not well documented. The aim of this population-based study was to estimate the overall and type-specific incidences of distal radius fracture in a urban population in The Netherlands. During 2009, all persons aged ≥18 years old with an acute distal radius fracture in two hospitals in The Netherlands were prospectively registered. In 2009, the mid-year study population consisted of 245,559 inhabitants ≥18 years old. Fractures were categorized according to the AO classification. 494 patients with acute distal radius fractures were registered in the two participating hospitals during the 1-year study period. The overall incidence of distal radius fracture was 20 per 10,000 person-years. Among women, the incidence rate increased from the age of 50 and reached a peak of 124 per 10,000 person-years in women 80 years and older. Among men, the incidence rate was low until the age of 80 years and older, and reached a peak of 24 per 10,000 person-years. The incidence rate among women between 50 and 79 years was 54/10,000 person-years. Extra-articular AO type A fractures were most common among all age groups, comprising 50 % of all fractures (40 % in men and 53 % in women). The overall incidence rate of distal radius fracture was 20 per 10,000 person-years. This incidence increases with age for both women and men. A lower incidence rate among women 50-79 years of age was found than previously reported, which may indicate a declining incidence in this age group. Extra-articular AO type A fractures were the most common fracture types.

Percutaneus treatment of varicose veins with bipolar radiofrequency ablation.

UNLABELLED: The traditional surgical treatment of an incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV) is challenged by endovenous techniques. Bipolar radio frequency induced thermo therapy (RFITT) is a new endovenous treatment, which occludes the vein by using the venous wall as a conductor. Linear endovenous energy density (LEED) describes the amount of energy used for vein closure. MATERIAL/METHODS: From March 2007 till April 2009, two cohorts (23 W and 20 W) were compared, respectively 280 and 178 patients. GSV and SSV were separately analyzed. Follow-up was performed at 3 weeks and 1 year post-operatively with duplex ultrasound, to assess vein closure and perioperative complaints. A visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (range 0-10) was documented. For patients operated after October 2008 follow-up was performed at least 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: 528 GSV and 76 SSV were treated. For the GSV a significant difference in LEED 40.8 17.1 in the 20 W cohort was found, resulting in higher occlusion rates 90.6% compared to 82.7% after 3 weeks. Follow-up of 1 year in the 20 W cohort showed 88.7% occlusion. Multivariate analysis showed that pullback speed (OR 3.7, CI 1.1-12.4) and CEAP classification (OR 3.1, CI 1.7-5.6) were significant predictors for vein occlusion. Despite a higher LEED, post-operative complaints were not significantly worse. CONCLUSION: RFITT is a safe and effective method to treat incompetent saphenous veins. Slower pullback speed with higher LEED results in higher closure rates without causing more pain.

In-hospital operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based analysis of 5593 patients in The Netherlands over a 10-year period.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in The Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study of nation-wide in-hospital mortality of RAAA repair. METHODS: Data were obtained from a national registry for medical diagnosis and procedures. In-hospital mortality of RAAA repair, defined as death during hospital admission irrespective of the cause of death, was determined in the period 1991-2000. Variables of potential influence on in-hospital mortality, including age, gender, date of surgery and hospital type (0-399 beds, > or =400 beds or university hospitals) were studied in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality of RAAA repair in 5593 patients in the 10-year period was 41% (95% confidence interval: 40-42%). In the multivariate analysis, age and hospital type were the most important independent predictors for in-hospital mortality. Gender, year and season of surgery could not be identified as significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Over a recent decade, in-hospital mortality of RAAA repair remained unchanged at 41%. Age and hospital class were the most important independent risk factors.

The impact of endovascular treatment on in-hospital mortality following non-ruptured AAA repair over a decade: a population based study of 16,446 patients.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesised that over the past decade, the nation-wide outcome of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has improved with the introduction of endovascular treatment. The aim of the study was to identify endovascularly-treated patients in a national registry and to assess the impact on in-hospital mortality of non-ruptured AAA repair, if any, after the introduction of endovascular repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied the nation-wide outcome of non-ruptured AAA repair over the past decade. Variables studied were age and gender of the patients, hospital size and type and the year in which treatment was performed and the outcome on in-hospital mortality. The in-hospital mortality of non-ruptured AAA repair in 16,446 patients in the 10-year period from 1991 to 2000 was 7.3% (6.2-8.2%). In the 15,589 (95%) patients that underwent conventional treatment, in-hospital mortality was 7.6% (7.0-8.1%), whereas in the endovascular group it was 1.9% (0.6-3.5%). In the multivariate analysis, age and endovascular repair were the most important independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: With the limitations of a national registry aside, the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair seems to have had a small but significant impact on in-hospital mortality following infrarenal AAA repair.

Results of aortic screening in the brothers of patients who had elective aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Brothers of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at high risk. In the present study brothers of patients who underwent elective AAA surgery were invited for aneurysm screening and the psychological consequences studied. METHODS: All brothers over the age of 50 years were invited for abdominal ultrasonography. They were asked to complete a standard psychological well-being questionnaire both before, and 3 months after screening. RESULTS: Some 571 brothers were identified: 251 were dead, 35 lived abroad, 16 could not be contacted for other reasons, 46 refused to participate and 13 were already known to have an AAA. Some 210 subjects (37.8 per cent) accepted the offer of screening. A new AAA was detected in 26 (12.3 per cent, 95 per cent confidence interval 8-18 per cent) of the men screened resulting in an overall prevalence of 18 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval 13-26 per cent). Eight (3.8 per cent) aneurysms were 5 cm or more in diameter and elective surgery was performed in five patients (2.4 per cent). The psychological dimensions of well-being (depression, anxiety, energy, and positive well-being) had not changed significantly 3 months after screening. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AAA in brothers of patients with AAA is far higher than in the overall male population of the same age. Screening does not seem to have a negative influence on psychological well-being.

Complications of standard elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate complications of standard elective repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre study. MATERIALS: Two-hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients undergoing standard elective surgery for an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Recording adverse events according to the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (26%) experienced some complication following elective aortic aneurysm surgery. Twenty-two patients had a mild complication (7.6%, 95% C.I. 4.8-11.2%), 27 a moderate (9.3%, 95% C.I. 6.2-13.2%) and 26 patients had a severe and/or fatal complication (8.9%, 95% C.I. 5.9-12.8%). The in-hospital mortality was 4.1% (12 patients, 95% C.I. 2.2-7.1%). Cardiac failure was the commonest primary cause for death (58%). Twenty-two per cent of the patients had a non-fatal complication: the most frequent being pulmonary (10%) and cardiac (10%). Patients with a history of cardiac events had a five times higher risk of a fatal outcome (95% C.I. 1.1-24.0) and a two and a half times higher risk of any severe fatal or non-fatal complication (95% C.I. 1.0-6.5). Other risk factors were advancing age and the presence of pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to mortality, morbidity figures of standard aneurysm operations are important, as well as associated risk factors. This is especially true when evaluating early repair of small aneurysms and new endovascular techniques.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: initial misdiagnosis and the effect on treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of misdiagnosis in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and its effect on treatment and outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 97 consecutive patients admitted with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm during the 5-year period, 1 January 1989--31 December 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial diagnosis, interval between onset of symptoms and admission, and mortality. RESULTS: 38 Patients (43%) presented with symptoms of their aneurysm exceeding nine hours prior to admission (range 10 hours to 14 days, median 2 days). Fifty patients (60%) were initially misdiagnosed by the referring practitioner. Ultrasonography was consistent with rupture in only 36/70 (51%). 52 Patients died (54%), (operative mortality 45 (46%)), and was not affected by delay in diagnosis or treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although delay in diagnosis or treatment did not seem to affect mortality, improved awareness of non-specific presentations of (imminent) rupture will result in fewer misdiagnoses and earlier treatment. A group of patients will undoubtedly benefit from this as they can be operated on at a stage when expected mortality is lower.

Mortality rates associated with operative treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in The Netherlands.

Information on surgery for non-ruptured and ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in all hospitals in The Netherlands in 1990 was obtained from the Dutch National Medical Registration Foundation. The operation rate in the population over the age of 50 years was 30.3 per 100,000 for non-ruptured AAA and 16.8 per 100,000 for ruptured aneurysm. The hospital operative mortality rate for non-ruptured AAA surgery was 6.8 per cent in 1289 patients and for ruptured aneurysm 43.6 per cent in 709. For non-ruptured AAA the mortality rate almost doubled per age group of 10 years, whereas the influence of age was less significant for ruptured lesions. The operative mortality rate for non-ruptured aneurysm in university hospitals exceeded that in other hospitals, but no difference was found for emergency surgery on ruptured AAA. Nationwide results give a more representative picture of the true mortality rate associated with operation for aortic aneurysm. Such data are important for planning future treatment strategy and for evaluating the efficacy of screening.

[Abdominal aortic aneurysm as incidental finding in abdominal ultrasonography]. / Het aneurysma aortae abdominalis als nevenbevinding bij echografisch onderzoek van het abdomen.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a life-threatening condition, which usually remains without symptoms until rupture occurs. The only way to reduce the high mortality rate (estimated at over 80%) is elective surgery on suitable patients. Therefore the presence of such an aneurysm has to be detected. For this ultrasonography is the method of choice. We studied 4399 consecutive patients aged 50 years and older, who underwent abdominal ultrasonography for the first time. According to the recommendation of the Dutch Society for Radiodiagnostics the whole abdomen was screened. In 4026 patients (1717 men and 2309 women) the ultrasound examination was performed for non-vascular reasons. In 199 of these patients (4.9%) an abdominal aortic aneurysm was an adventitious finding (133 men (7.7%) and 66 women (2.9%)). In men aged 60 years and older it was even found in 10.2%. When abdominal ultrasonography is performed for the first time in a patient aged 50 years or older, the aorta has to be screened for presence of an aneurysm.

[A patient with Salmonella aortitis]. / Een patiënt met Salmonella-aortitis.

Bacterial aortitis is a rare but serious condition. Even when treated surgically, the prognosis is poor. Prompt diagnosis is mandatory. In the absence of specific clinical signs, radiological assessment by means of ultrasound and CT is most valuable. The treatment of choice is early surgical drainage, debridement and arterial reconstruction, preferably through uncontaminated tissue combined with antibiotic therapy. We report the case of a man aged 80 with Salmonella aortitis in whom the diagnosis of bacterial aortitis was made by means of ultrasound and CT, following which successful intervention was carried out.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm as an incidental finding in abdominal ultrasonography.

The difference between the mortality rate from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (overall mortality rate 85-95 per cent and operative mortality rate 23-63 per cent), and that for elective aneurysm repair (less than 5 per cent) is dramatic. Awareness of the existence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is therefore essential. Of 1800 consecutive patients aged greater than or equal to 50 years referred for their first abdominal ultrasonography, 113 who had been referred specifically for suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm or vascular screening were excluded. The remaining 1687 patients (693 men and 994 women) form the study group. Apart from the symptom-directed examination, the entire abdomen of every patient was routinely studied by ultrasonography. The definition of an abdominal aortic aneurysm was a local dilatation of the aorta with an anteroposterior diameter greater than 30 mm or greater than 1.5 times the anteroposterior diameter of the proximal aorta. In 82 cases (4.9 per cent) an abdominal aortic aneurysm was disclosed; 61 were in men (8.8 per cent) and 21 were in women (2.1 per cent). The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm as an incidental finding in men aged greater than or equal to 60 years was 11.4 per cent. In every patient aged greater than or equal to 50 years undergoing their first abdominal ultrasonography examination, the aorta should be screened for the presence of an aneurysm.

Malignant leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata.

Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata is a rare condition characterized by the presence of multiple intraabdominal nodules that consist of benign smooth muscle. We found 42 documented cases in the literature. Malignant degeneration appears to be extremely rare. We describe the second case with proved malignancy.