Overcoming Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer Using the BCL-XL-Specific Degrader DT2216.

Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Although gemcitabine is the standard of care for most patients with pancreatic cancer, its efficacy is limited by the development of resistance. This resistance may be attributable to the evasion of apoptosis caused by the overexpression of BCL-2 family antiapoptotic proteins. In this study, we investigated the role of BCL-XL in gemcitabine resistance to identify a combination therapy to more effectively treat pancreatic cancer. We used CRISPR-Cas9 screening to identify the key genes involved in gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer cell dependencies on different BCL-2 family proteins and the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and DT2216 (a BCL-XL proteolysis targeting chimera or PROTAC) were determined by MTS, Annexin-V/PI, colony formation, and 3D tumor spheroid assays. The therapeutic efficacy of the combination was investigated in several patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models of pancreatic cancer. We identified BCL-XL as a key mediator of gemcitabine resistance. The combination of gemcitabine and DT2216 synergistically induced cell death in multiple pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro In vivo, the combination significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice compared with the individual agents in pancreatic cancer PDX models. Their synergistic antitumor activity is attributable to DT2216-induced degradation of BCL-XL and concomitant suppression of MCL-1 by gemcitabine. Our results suggest that DT2216-mediated BCL-XL degradation augments the antitumor activity of gemcitabine and their combination could be more effective for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on histologic diagnosis in Barrett's esophagus visible neoplasia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data are limited on the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a potential diagnostic and staging tool in Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and factors associated with change of histologic diagnosis by ESD compared with pre-ESD histology. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for BE visible neoplasia. A change in histologic diagnosis was defined as "upstaged" or "downstaged" if the ESD specimen had a higher or lower degree, respectively, of dysplasia or neoplasia when compared with pre-ESD specimens. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients (median age, 69 years; 81% men) with BE visible neoplasia underwent ESD from 2016 to 2021. Baseline histology was obtained using forceps (n = 182) or EMR (n = 23). ESD changed the histologic diagnosis in 55.1% of cases (113/205), of which 68.1% were upstaged and 31.9% downstaged. The frequency of change in diagnosis after ESD was similar whether baseline histology was obtained using forceps (55.5%) or EMR (52.2%) (P = .83). In aggregate, 23.9% of cases (49/205) were upstaged to invasive cancer on ESD histopathology. On multivariate analysis, lesions in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 confidence interval, 1.1-3.9; P = .02) and prior radiofrequency ablation (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5; P = .02) were predictors of change in histologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: ESD led to a change of diagnosis in more than half of patients with BE visible neoplasia. Selective ESD can serve as a potential diagnostic and staging tool, particularly in those with suspected invasive disease. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.).

Systematic Selective Sampling of Cholecystectomy Specimens Is Adequate to Detect Incidental Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma.

Many gallbladder adenocarcinomas (ACs) are detected incidentally in routine cholecystectomy specimens, yet sampling practices vary when intestinal metaplasia (IM) or dysplasia are found via routine sampling. Our practice has been to submit 5 additional sections when IM is found, but cases with dysplasia are entirely submitted. We sought to determine an appropriate sampling protocol when encountering these findings. We retrospectively identified cholecystectomy specimens with these features over a 26-month period, yielding 48 of 4059 (1%) cases. Four pathologists independently classified the (2 longitudinal and 1 cystic duct margin) original sections into 1 of 3 categories (IM, low-grade dysplasia [LGD] or high-grade dysplasia [HGD]); initial findings were correlated with final diagnoses. Sixteen (33%) cases had additional findings upon further sampling, including LGD (n=10) or HGD (n=4) and AC (n=2). HGD always accompanied malignancy. We prospectively analyzed 39 of 3133 (1%) additional cholecystectomy specimens, initially submitting the same routine sections. We submitted 5 random sections from cases with IM. Cases with LGD were first examined with 1 additional section per centimeter. All remaining tissue was submitted in all of these cases and separately reviewed. Cases with HGD were entirely submitted as both test cases with HGD in initial sections ultimately showed carcinoma. This protocol detected all cases of HGD and AC. Patients with clear cystic duct margins did not experience neoplastic progression, even if dysplasia was present elsewhere. We conclude gallbladders with HGD should be entirely submitted, LGD may be representatively sampled, and routine sampling is adequate for IM.

Differential Diagnosis of a Patient with Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: We describe the differential diagnosis of an obese 12-year-old boy of Mexican origin who presented with a 6-year history of abnormal lipid profile and elevated liver transaminase levels. METHODS: The patient underwent routine clinical testing, an abdominal ultrasound and, ultimately, a liver biopsy. Based on the histologic findings, a serum leukocyte lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) assay and DNA sequencing of the lipase A (LIPA) gene were performed. RESULTS: Liver biopsy revealed diffuse microvesicular steatosis with clusters of foamy histiocytes in the lobules and portal areas. Our differential diagnosis included nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; medication-induced hepatotoxicity; glycogenic hepatopathy; medium-chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase or long-chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency; and lysosomal storage disorders, including Niemann-Pick disease and lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D). Serum LAL activity was absent, and DNA sequencing confirmed homozygous mutation in LIPA. CONCLUSIONS: Although it occurs rarely, LAL-D should be considered in the differential diagnosis of microvesicular steatosis for a timely diagnosis.