Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2422104, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008299

ABSTRACT

Importance: Family-centered care recognizes families as central to child health and well-being and prioritizes clinician collaboration with families to ensure optimal pediatric care and outcomes. Clinician interpersonal sensitivity and communication skills are key to this approach. Objective: To examine perceptions of and factors associated with family-centered care among clinicians working in pediatric and congenital heart care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, participants from diverse clinical disciplines (pediatric cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, nursing, anesthesia, neonatology, intensive care, psychology, and others), completed an online survey between June 2020 and February 2021. Participants included physicians, surgeons, nurses, and allied and mental health professionals at an Australian quaternary pediatric hospital network. Statistical analysis was performed from August 2022 to June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Family-centered care across 4 domains (showing interpersonal sensitivity, treating people respectfully, providing general information, and communicating specific information) was measured using the validated Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers. Clinician burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment), confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs, and psychological, clinical role, and sociodemographic factors were also assessed. Informed by theory, hierarchical linear regression was used to identify factors associated with family-centered care. Results: There were 212 clinicians (177 women [84.3%]; 153 nurses [72.2%], 32 physicians [15.1%], 22 allied and mental health professionals [10.4%], 5 surgeons [2.3%]; 170 [80.2%] aged 20-49 years) who participated (55% response rate). Of the 4 family-centered care domains, scores for treating people respectfully were highest and associated with greater clinician confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs (effect size [ß], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.72]; P < .001), lower depersonalization (ß, 0.04 [95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01]; P = .02), and a greater sense of personal accomplishment at work (ß, 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.04]; P = 0.04). Greater interpersonal sensitivity was associated with greater confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs (ß, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97]; P < .001), a greater sense of personal accomplishment at work (ß, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05]; P = .04), and lower use of approach-based coping, such as problem-solving (ß, 0.37 [95% CI, -0.71 to -0.02]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, burnout and confidence responding to families' psychosocial needs were associated with clinicians' perceptions of family-centered care. These findings suggest that targeted interventions to address these factors may benefit clinicians and also potentially strengthen the practice of family-centered care in pediatric and congenital heart settings.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Heart Defects, Congenital , Professional-Family Relations , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Heart Defects, Congenital/psychology , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Adult , Patient-Centered Care , Australia , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Child , Burnout, Professional/psychology
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(23): 2225-2245, 2023 12 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030353

ABSTRACT

Although neuroimaging advances have deepened our understanding of brain health in individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD), it is less clear how neuroimaging findings relate to neurodevelopmental and mental health outcomes across the lifespan. We systematically synthesized and critically evaluated evidence on associations between neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental, neurocognitive, psychiatric, or behavioral outcomes among individuals with transposition of great arteries or single-ventricle CHD (Protocol CRD42021229617). Six databases were searched and 45 papers from 25 unique studies were identified. Structural brain injury was generally linked to poorer neurodevelopment in infancy. Brain volumes and microstructural and functional brain changes appear linked to neurocognitive outcomes, including deficits in attention, learning, memory, and executive function in children and adolescents. Fetal neuroimaging studies were limited. Four papers investigated psychiatric outcomes; none found associations with neuroimaging. Multicenter, longitudinal studies incorporating functional neuroimaging and mental health outcomes are much-needed to inform early neuroprotective and therapeutic strategies in CHD.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , Heart Defects, Congenital , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Neuroimaging , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Executive Function , Multicenter Studies as Topic
3.
Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis ; 11: 100434, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36571073

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased stress and strain on health professionals. With a focus on paediatric cardiac care, this study explored health professionals' concerns about COVID-19, perceptions of the impact of pandemic on healthcare, and experiences of psychological stress. Methods: Paediatric health professionals working at a large quaternary hospital in Australia were invited to complete a survey between June 2020 and February 2021. Demographic factors, clinical role characteristics, and anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed. Qualitative data on experiences and perceived effects of the pandemic on paediatric cardiac care were also collected. Results: 228 health professionals (152 nurses, 37 medical doctors, 22 allied and mental health professionals, 17 medical research and administrative staff) participated in the survey (54.4% response rate, 85% women). Half the sample (52.2%) endorsed 'moderate' to 'extreme' worry about COVID-19 and 38% of participants perceived healthcare services as adversely impacted by the pandemic to a 'great' or 'very great' extent. Almost one in five health professionals reported anxiety (18%) and 11% reported depressive symptoms indicative of a need for clinical intervention. Six themes were identified in the qualitative data: (1) Concern about the consequences of visitor restrictions and disrupted patient services, (2) Intensified strain on healthcare workers, (3) Feelings of fear and loss, (4) Social isolation and disconnection, (5) Adapting to change, and (6) Gratitude. Conclusion: Timely, tailored policies, supports, and interventions are needed to address health professionals' mental health needs during and beyond the pandemic, to minimize the far-reaching impact of situational stressors.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...