Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. Esp. Cir. Ortop. Traumatol. (Ed. Impr.) ; 60(5): 330-334, sept.-oct. 2016. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-155743

ABSTRACT

El abordaje lateral transpsoas a la columna lumbar es una técnica mínimamente invasiva cada vez más usada debido a sus buenos resultados y a su tasa de complicaciones baja. El sangrado de este tipo de cirugía es escaso ya que la disección de partes blandas es mínima comparada con la cirugía vertebral tradicional, pero las arterias segmentarias y los grandes vasos pueden ser lesionados. Hasta ahora, hay muy pocos casos descritos de hematoma retroperitoneal mediante este abordaje pero este es el primero en una fusión lumbar intersomática mediante abordaje lateral transpsoas (XLIF) sin instrumentación añadida y el primero con shock hemorrágico. Los síntomas del hematoma retroperitoneal son inespecíficos, siendo los más prevalentes la taquicardia, la hipotensión y la anemia. Con este caso pretendemos mostrar que, a pesar de los buenos resultados de esta técnica, no está exenta de complicaciones graves (AU)


The transpsoas approach, also known as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), to the lumbar spine is a novel minimally invasive technique with positive clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. There is a low risk of bleeding, due to this approach causing less soft tissue disruption than traditional spine surgery, but segmental arteries and great vessels can be damaged. Retroperitoneal haematoma is a major complication, with few cases reported. This is the first case reported in a Stand-alone XLIF and also the first case reported with haemorrhagic shock. Non-specific symptoms such tachycardia, hypotension, and anaemia are the most prevalent in this complication. With this case, our aim is to describe serious complications related to XLIF (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Spine/surgery , Spine , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Low Back Pain/complications , Low Back Pain/therapy , Arthrodesis/instrumentation , Arthrodesis/methods , Physical Examination/methods , Neurophysiology/methods , Neurophysiology/standards , Osteoarthritis, Spine/epidemiology , Lumbosacral Region/pathology , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Lumbosacral Region , Angiography/methods
2.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol ; 60(5): 330-4, 2016.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25703640

ABSTRACT

The transpsoas approach, also known as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), to the lumbar spine is a novel minimally invasive technique with positive clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. There is a low risk of bleeding, due to this approach causing less soft tissue disruption than traditional spine surgery, but segmental arteries and great vessels can be damaged. Retroperitoneal haematoma is a major complication, with few cases reported. This is the first case reported in a Stand-alone XLIF and also the first case reported with haemorrhagic shock. Non-specific symptoms such tachycardia, hypotension, and anaemia are the most prevalent in this complication. With this case, our aim is to describe serious complications related to XLIF.


Subject(s)
Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion , Aged , Female , Hematoma/etiology , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Retroperitoneal Space , Spinal Fusion/methods
3.
Rev. esp. cir. ortop. traumatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 52(6): 381-385, nov. 2008. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-69368

ABSTRACT

Introducción. Se realiza un estudio retrospectivo de una serie de espondilolistesis degenerativas de grado I y II, intervenidas quirúrgicamente llevando a cabo una fusión vertebral en un nivel, comparando la fusión circunferencial con la fusión posterolateral.Material y método. La serie consta de 33 pacientes (22 mujeres y 11 varones) que fueron intervenidos entre 1999 y 2002. En todos los casos se hizo un abordaje posterior y una artrodesis vertebral en un único nivel: en 15 pacientes se efectuó una artrodesis posterolateral (grupo 1) y en 18, una artrodesis circunferencial (grupo 2). La media de edad en el grupo 1 fue de 54,2 años (rango: 34-78 años) y el seguimiento mínimo, de 3 años (rango: 3-5,6 años). La media de edad en el grupo 2 fue de 50,8 años (rango: 25-76 años) y el seguimiento mínimo, de 3,2 años (rango: 3,2-5,5 años). Nohubo diferencias significativas en la edad entre ambos grupos. Analizamos los resultados clínicos con el cuestionario funcional SF-36 y con una valoración subjetiva del dolor por parte del paciente. Analizamos radiológicamente la fusión del espacio vertebral.Resultados. Las artrodesis circunferenciales obtienen unapuntuación media de 47,7 puntos en el SF-36, superior a los 38,4 puntos de las artrodesis posterolaterales. Los resultados radiológicos en cuanto a la obtención de la artrodesis son muy similares.Conclusiones. En nuestra experiencia, se obtienen mejoresresultados clínicos y radiológicos en el tratamiento quirúrgico de las espondilolistesis degenerativas cuando se realiza una artrodesis circunferencial


Introduction. A retrospective study was carried out of a series of grade I and II degenerative spondylolistheses subjected to a single-level fusion, comparing circumferential to posterolateral fusion.Materials and methods. Our series comprises 33 patients (22 females and 11 males) operated between 1999 and 2002. In all cases a single-level fusion was performed through a posterior approach: a posterolateral fusion was conducted in 15 patients (group 1), and a circumferential fusion in 18 (group 2). Mean age in group 1 was 54.2 years (range: 34-78), andfollow-up at least 3 years (range: 3-5.6 years). Mean age in group 2 was 50.8 years (range: 25-76 years) and follow-up at least 3.2 years (range: 3.2-5.5 years). There were no significant age-related differences between both groups. Clinical results were analyzed with the SF-36 functional scale and with a subjective pain assessment by the patient. We radiologicallyanalyzed fusion of the vertebral space.Results. Circumferential fusion obtained a mean score of47.7 points on the SF-36 scale vs 38.4 points for posterolateral fusion. X-ray results as to the success of the fusion procedure are very similar in both groups.Conclusions. In our experience, surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolistheses achieves better clinical and radiological results when a circumferential fusion is performed


Subject(s)
Humans , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Arthrodesis/methods , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...