ABSTRACT
Inflammatory pseudotumors are benign lesions that are rarely reported in the head and neck. Moreover, intraosseous inflammatory pseudotumors of the maxilla are extremely rare, with less than 10 cases reported. A 52-year-old woman presented with recurrent dental infections; computed tomography scan of the osteolytic maxillary bone lesion and incisional biopsy were performed. Histopathological examination revealed that the lesion was composed of fascicles of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, in addition to sheets of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and occasional other inflammatory cells. An infiltrative growth pattern was observed. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed an inflammatory pseudotumor. A partial maxillectomy was performed. There was no evidence of recurrence during the 4-month follow-up period. Inflammatory pseudotumors should be considered when treating destructive maxillary lesions. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to confirm polyclonal plasma cell proliferation.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of two different implant surface treatments on initial bone connection by comparing the Removal Torque Values (RTQs) at 7 and 10 days after chemically modified, sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched (modSLA), and Laser-etched (LE) Ti implant placements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty modSLA and 20 LE implants were installed on the left and right tibias of 20 adult rabbits. RTQs were measured after 7 and 10 days in 10 rabbits each. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs of the two implants were observed by using Quanta FEG 650 from the FEI company (Hillsboro, OR, USA). Analyses of surface elements and components were conducted using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). RESULTS: The mean RTQs were 12.29 ± 0.830 and 12.19 ± 0.713 Ncm after 7 days (P=.928) and 16.47 ± 1.324 and 16.17 ± 1.165 Ncm after 10 days (P=.867) for LE and modSLA, respectively, indicating no significant inter-group differences. Pore sizes in the LE were 40 µm and consisted of numerous small pores, whereas pore sizes in the modSLA were 5 µm. In the EDS analysis, Ti, O, and C were the only three elements found in the LE surfaces. Na, Ca, Cl, and K were also observed in modSLA, in addition to Ti, O, and C. CONCLUSION: The implants showed no significant difference in biomechanical bond strength to bone in early-stage osseointegration. LE implant can be considered an excellent surface treatment method in addition to the modSLA implant and can be applied to the early loading of the prosthesis clinically.
