Blood coagulation, risk factors and associated complications in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective cohort study.

A good understanding of the possible risk factors for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) severity could help clinicians in identifying patients who need prioritized treatment to prevent disease progression and adverse outcomes. COVID-19-linked coagulopathy is one of the life-threatening severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections. Growing evidence indicates a correlation between abnormal coagulation and increased risk of venous thromboembolism; in COVID-19-infected patients, yet a clear understanding of the role of coagulopathy in the severity of COVID-19 illness is still unresolved. This retrospective cohort study was thus undertaken to investigate the role of coagulation dysfunction with COVID-19 mortality/severity. Blood samples from 1000 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were collected. The study participants were both male and female in equal ratios with a mean age of 48.94. Patients were followed-up until discharge either for recovery or death. All biochemical investigations-complete blood count and coagulation profile including D-dimers, prothrombin time, partial prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio was performed in COVID-19 survivors and in non-survivors admitted in intensive care unit. In the survivor group, all coagulation parameters were within normal limits, and 8.7% had a low red blood count. The most common risk factors associated with COVID-19 patients were diabetes mellitus (2.8%), hypertension (10.8%), and heart disease (3%). In the non-survivor group, the coagulation parameters were above the normal range (prothrombin in 31.5%, PTT in 10.5%, international normalized ratio in 26.3%, D-dimer in 36.8%) with thrombocytopenia in 21.04% of patients. Other complications were pulmonary embolism in 21.05% and venous thromboembolism in 15.7% of non-survivors. A significant association was found between increased markers of coagulopathy and the severity of SARS-CoV2 infection. Furthermore, the severity of infection was observed to increase with risk factors such as age, heart disease, hypertension, and DM eventually affecting COVID-19 prognosis and mortality.

Comparative study between chronic automated red blood cell exchange and manual exchange transfusion in patients with sickle cell disease: A single center experience from Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Red cell transfusion remains the gold standard in managing sickle cell disease (SCD) with severe complications. Offering red blood cell exchange (RBCX) either manual exchange transfusion (MET) or automated RBCX (aRBCX) can reduce the complications of chronic transfusion and maintain target Hb thresholds. This study audits the hospital experience of overseeing adult SCD patients treated with RBCX, both automated and manual, and compares the safety and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted as an audit for chronic RBCX for adult patients with SCD in 2015-2019 at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: A total of 344 RBCX for 20 adult SCD patients who were enrolled in regular RBCX, (11/20) patients had regular aRBCX with a total of (157) sessions, and (9/20) patients had MET with a total of (187) sessions. The median level of HbS% post-aRBCX was significantly lower than MET (24.5.9% vs. 47.3%, P < 0.010). Patients on aRBCX had fewer sessions (5 vs. 7.5, P < 0.067) with better disease control. Although the median yearly pRBC units per patient for aRBCX was more than the double needed for MET (28.64 vs. 13.39, P < 0.010), the median ferritin level was 42 µg/L in aRBCX versus 983.7 µg/L in MET, P < 0.012. CONCLUSION: Compared to MET, aRBCX was more effective in reducing HbS, with fewer hospital visits and better disease control. Although more pRBCs were transfused, the ferritin level was better controlled in the aRBCX group without increasing alloimmunization risk.

Thromboprophylaxis and mortality among patients who developed venous thromboembolism in seven major hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) during hospitalization is a serious and potentially fatal condition. Despite its effectiveness, evidence-based thromboprophylaxis is still underutilized in many countries including Saudi Arabia. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: Our objectives were to determine how often hospital-acquired VTE patients received appropriate thromboprophylaxis, VTE-associated mortality, and the percentage of patients given anticoagulant therapy and adherence to it after discharged. METHODS: This study was conducted in seven major hospitals in Saudi Arabia. From July 1, 2009, till June 30, 2010, all recorded deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) cases were noted. Only patients with confirmed VTE diagnosis were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1241 confirmed VTE cases occurred during the 12-month period. Most (58.3%) of them were DVT only, 21.7% were PE, and 20% were both DVT and PE. 21.4% and 78.6% of confirmed VTE occurred in surgical and medical patients, respectively. Only 40.9% of VTE cases received appropriate prophylaxis (63.2% for surgical patients and 34.8% for medical patients; P < 0.001). The mortality rate was 14.3% which represented 1.6% of total hospital deaths. Mortality was 13.5% for surgical patients and 14.5% for medical patients (P > 0.05). Appropriate thromboprophylaxis was associated with 4.11% absolute risk reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval: 0.24%-7.97%). Most (89.4%) of the survived patients received anticoagulation therapy at discharge and 71.7% of them were adherent to it on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Thromboprophylaxis was underutilized in major Saudi hospitals denoting a gap between guideline and practice. This gap was more marked in medical than surgical patients. Hospital-acquired VTE was associated with significant mortality. Efforts to improve thromboprophylaxis utilization are warranted.

Antibodies against human platelet alloantigens and human leucocyte antigen class 1 in Saudi Arabian multiparous women and multi-transfused patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of alloimmunization against human platelet antigens (HPAs) and human leucocyte antigen class 1 (HLA1) in multiparous women and multi-transfused patients.   METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January and August 2013, on 50 multiparous women with no history of previous blood transfusion recruited from the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, and 50 patients, who received multiple platelet transfusions, recruited from the Hematology/Oncology Ward, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: The frequency of alloimmunization among multiparous pregnant women was 76%, as follows: 16% against HLA1 only, 8% against HPAs only, 52% against both HPAs and HLA1 antigens. In multi-transfused patients, the rate of alloimmunization was 42% as follows: 2% against HLA1 only, 22% against HPAs only, 18% against both HPAs and HLA1 antigens. The frequency of alloimmunization increases with the number of pregnancies, but not with the number of platelet transfusions. CONCLUSION: Alloimmunization against HPAs and HLA1 is very common among Saudi multiparous women and multi-transfused patients, which encourages the search for the extent of the possible complications in the fetus and newborn and in multitransfused patients and how to prevent their occurrence.

Pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism. Part I - deep vein thrombus diagnosis and treatment.

Venous thromboembolic VTE complications are leading causes of maternal mortality in the developed world. Over the past 20 years, there has been an increase in the incidence of deep venous thrombosis DVT in pregnant women, and this increase may be explained by the risk factors including older age, cesarean section, history of VTE, and presence of thrombophilia. To reduce the incidence of VTE in pregnancy and improve the outcomes, a wider understanding of the risk factors, and a better identification of women at risk of the thrombosis, with objective diagnosis and provide the optimal effective and safe treatment. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, considered manifestations of the same disease, are often preventable and usually treatable. Nevertheless, VTE remains a substantial problem despite the dramatic decline in pregnancy-related mortality in industrialized countries over the past century. While diagnosis and management of VTE in pregnancy are challenging, and many diagnostic tests are less accurate in pregnant than non-pregnant patients, and the available options are suboptimal. This is a review in 2 parts, in part I, we address the following questions: In pregnant women, who developed DVT; how to diagnose, and the treatment once the diagnosis is confirmed. For each of these problems, the relevant background is briefly summarized, approaches recommended, and the suggested practical and relatively safe diagnostic management approaches. Part II, we address pregnant women with pulmonary embolism, how to diagnose and treat.

Reduced hemoglobin on day of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection is associated with low graft content of vascular progenitors and increased toxicity after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Tissue damage after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) occurs as a result of high-dose chemotherapy and radiation. The aim was to determine the importance of pretransplant anemia on toxicity and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements after autologous HSCT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 350 patients undergoing autologous HSCT were included in the analysis. Patient factors and pretransplant laboratory values of possible relevance were assessed in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Reduced hemoglobin (Hb) on the first day of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection was significantly associated with increased organ toxicity after HSCT, as measured by the Seattle criteria. Lower Hb levels at baseline before transplantation, but not at PBPC collection, were significantly associated with increased RBC transfusion requirements. In a second cohort of 28 patients, higher Hb levels on the day of PBPC collection were significantly associated with increased levels of endothelial-like vascular progenitor cells in PBPC grafts. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that higher Hb levels on the day of PBPC collection may be a marker of reduced toxicity associated with HSCT and increased vascular progenitors in PBPC collections. Further, baseline anemia before transplant may reflect an unfavorable hematopoietic microenvironment that leads to increased RBC transfusion requirements.