Vasa previa Type 3: Advocating for universal screening and investigation of risk factors: A case report.

Vasa previa is a critical obstetric condition marked by unprotected fetal vessels near the cervical os, traditionally divided into Types 1 and 2, based on its association with velamentous cord insertion and accessory placental lobes, respectively. The recent introduction of Type 3 vasa previa addresses atypical cases. We report a unique intrapartum diagnosis of Type 3 vasa previa in a 39-year-old at 38 weeks of gestation, identified during labor induction without prior risk indicators. Despite lacking traditional risk factors, advanced imaging and clinical vigilance led to a primary cesarean delivery, confirming the diagnosis through intraoperative findings of three aberrant vessels with marginal cord insertion. This case emphasizes the critical importance of considering vasa previa in prenatal and intrapartum care to prevent adverse outcomes, advocating for universal screening practices to identify this rare but significant condition.

Unexpected discovery of fetal bones instead of an intrauterine device: A unique gynecological case report.

This case report details an unusual and unexpected finding in a 37-year-old woman with a history of two cesarean sections, who had an intrauterine device implanted. The patient presented with symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding and dysmenorrhea. An initial ultrasound confirmed the presence of the intrauterine device. However, a startling discovery was made during the intrauterine device removal procedure: fetal bones were found within the patient. This case underscores the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluations in gynecological practice, particularly when dealing with patients who have complex gynecological histories. Significantly, it brings to light the necessity of employing hysteroscopy for comprehensive diagnostic assessment in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding post-abortion. This approach could aid in identifying rare and unexpected findings, such as retained fetal bones, which might be missed by conventional ultrasound. The report emphasizes the need for vigilance and thoroughness in gynecological examinations and contributes to the understanding of potential complications and anomalies associated with intrauterine device usage and post-abortion care.

Diagnostic and treatment patterns in urinary and genital tract infections: insights from a referral clinic in Beirut, Lebanon.

BACKGROUND: Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and Genital Tract Infections (GTIs) are common yet serious health concerns. Precise diagnosis is crucial due to the potential severe consequences of misdiagnosis. This study aims to distinguish between UTIs and GTIs, highlighting the importance of accurate differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study encompassed 294 patients, categorized into 4 groups: Group GNI (no infection, N = 57), Group GUI (urinary infection, N = 52), Group GGI (genital infection, N = 139), and Group GGUI (both infections, N = 46). Methods included patient interviews, clinical examinations, and laboratory tests such as urine and vaginal swab cultures. RESULTS: The investigation revealed no significant differences in age, BMI, residency, or nationality across groups. However, socioeconomic status varied, with Group GNI having the lowest proportion of low socioeconomic status. In obstetrical characteristics, non-pregnancy rates were higher in Groups GUI and GGUI, with GGUI showing a notably higher abortion rate. Symptom analysis indicated lower symptom prevalence in Group GNI, with pain, itching, pruritus, and vaginal discharge being less frequent, suggesting a link between infection presence and symptom severity. Treatment patterns showed higher usage of ciprofloxacin, antifungals, and vaginal tablets in Groups GUI and GGUI. Laboratory findings highlighted significant Leucocyte Esterase presence and variations in WBC and RBC counts, particularly in Group GGUI. CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes the need for advanced diagnostic techniques, especially those focusing on individual microbial patterns, to enhance UGTI diagnosis. Variations in symptom presentation and treatment across groups underline the necessity for personalized diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Uterine body placenta accreta spectrum: A detailed literature review.

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a major obstetrical problem whose incidence is rising. Current guidelines recommend screening of all women with placenta previa and risk factors for PAS between 20 and 24 weeks. Risk factors, diagnosis, and management of previa PAS are well established, but an apparently normal location of the placenta does not exclude PAS. Literature data are scarce on uterine body PAS, which carries a high risk of maternal and neonatal adverse outcome, but is still easily missed on prenatal ultrasound. We conducted a comprehensive review to identify possible risk factors, clinical presentations, and diagnostic modalities of uterine PAS. A total of 133 cases were found during a 70-year period (1949-2019). The vast majority of them presented with signs of uterine rupture, even prior to the viability threshold of 24 weeks (up to 45%). Major risk factors included previous cesarean delivery, uterine curettage, uterine surgery, Asherman's syndrome, manual removal of the placenta, endometritis, high parity, young maternal age, in vitro fertilization, radiotherapy, uterine artery embolization, and uterine leiomyoma. Diagnosis was pre-symptomatic in only 3% of cases. Future studies should differentiate between previa PAS and uterine body PAS.