COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.

Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions. Results: Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30-60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues. Conclusion: Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system.

Changes in healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, practices, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ABSTRACT: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an unprecedented health crisis around the world, not least because of its heterogeneous clinical presentation and course. The new information on the pandemic emerging daily has made it challenging for healthcare workers (HCWs) to stay current with the latest knowledge, which could influence their attitudes and practices during patient care.This study is a follow-up evaluation of changes in HCWs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices as well as anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic. Data were collected through an anonymous, predesigned, self-administered questionnaire that was sent online to HCWs in Saudi Arabia.The questionnaire was sent to 1500 HCWs, with a 63.8% response rate (N = 957). The majority of respondents were female (83%), and the most common age group was 31 to 40 years (52.2%). Nurses constituted 86.3% of the respondents. HCWs reported higher anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic which increased from 4.91 ±â€Š2.84 to 8.6 ±â€Š2.27 on an 11-point Likert scale compared to other viral outbreaks. HCWs believed that their own preparedness as well as that of their hospital's intensive care unit or emergency room was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than during the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus pandemic (2012-2015). About 58% of HCWs attended one or more simulations concerning the management of COVID-19 patients in their intensive care unit/emergency room, and nearly all had undergone N95 mask fit testing. The mean score of HCWs' knowledge of COVID-19 was 9.89/12. For most respondents (94.6%), the perception of being at increased risk of infection was the main cause of anxiety related to COVID-19; the mean score of anxiety over COVID-19 increased from 4.91 ±â€Š2.84 before to 8.6 ±â€Š2.27 during the pandemic in Saudi Arabia.HCWs' anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 have increased since a pandemic was declared. It is vital that healthcare facilities provide more emotional and psychological support for all HCWs.

Factors that influence the self-reported confidence of pediatric residents as team leaders during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A national survey.

OBJECTIVE: The leadership skills of pediatric residents during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may have major impacts on their performance. These skills should be addressed during the pediatric residency training program. Therefore, we aimed to identify the perceptions of residents regarding their level of confidence in providing or leading a real pediatric CPR code, and to identify different factors that might influence their self-confidence when assuming the role of a team leader during a real CPR. DESIGN & SETTING: Cross-sectional paper-based and online electronic surveys were conducted in February 2017, which included all Saudi pediatric residency program trainees. INTERVENTIONS: A survey questionnaire was distributed to Saudi pediatric residency trainees throughout the Kingdom. The main aim was to assess their perceived level of confidence when running a real pediatric CPR code either as a team leader or as a team member. RESULTS: The survey was distributed and sent by email to 1052 residents, where it was received by 640 and 231 responded (response rate = 36%). Almost one-fifth of the respondents (19.5%) did not have a valid pediatric advanced life support (PALS) certificate. The most frequently reported obstacles to life support training were lack of time (45.8%) and its financial cost (22.7%). The mean self-reported confidence as a CPR team member was reported significantly more frequently than being a CPR team leader (mean standard deviation, SD) = 7.8 (2.1) and 6.7 (2.4) respectively, P < .001). The self-reported confidence as a CPR team leader was reported significantly more frequently in males compared with female respondents (mean ±â€¯SD = 6.7 ±â€¯2.4 and 5.9 ±â€¯2.4, respectively; P < .013). There was a significant positive effect of recent attendance at a real CPR event on the perceived self-rated confidence of residents as a CPR team leader (P < .001). Residents who reported that they had often assumed a real CPR leadership role had significantly greater perceived self-confidence compared with those who assumed a member role (P < .05). Furthermore, residents without a valid PALS certificate had significantly less confidence in leading CPR teams than their peers who were recently certified (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported confidence as team leader during CPR was higher among residents who were certified in life support courses, exposed to CPR during their training, and those who assumed the role of a team leader during CPR. Our findings suggests the need to incorporate life support training courses and simulation-based mock code programs with an emphasis on the leadership in the curriculum of the pediatric residency training program.