ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies focusing on long-term chest function after chest wall injury due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate long-term pain, lung function, physical function, and fracture healing after manual or mechanical CPR and in patients with and without flail chest. METHODS: Patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between 2013 and 2020 and transported to Sahlgrenska University Hospital were identified. Survivors who had undergone a computed tomography (CT) showing chest wall injury were contacted. Thirty-five patients answered a questionnaire regarding pain, physical function, and quality of life and 25 also attended a clinical examination to measure the respiratory and physical functions 3.9 (SD 1.7, min 2-max 8) years after the CPR. In addition, 22 patients underwent an additional CT scan to evaluate fracture healing. RESULTS: The initial CT showed bilateral rib fractures in all but one patient and sternum fracture in 69 %. At the time of the follow-up none of the patients had persistent pain, however, two patients were experiencing local discomfort in the chest wall. Lung function and thoracic expansion were significantly lower compared to reference values (FVC 14 %, FEV1 18 %, PEF 10 % and thoracic expansion 63 %) (p < 0.05). Three of the patients had remaining unhealed injuries. Patients who had received mechanical CPR in additional to manual CPR had a lower peak expiratory flow (80 vs 98 % of predicted values) (p=0.030) =0.030) and those having flail chest had less range of motion in the thoracic spine (84 vs 127 % of predicted) (p = 0.019) otherwise the results were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: None of the survivors had long-term pain after CPR-related chest wall injuries. Despite decreased lower lung function and thoracic expansion, most patients had no limitations in physical mobility. Only minor differences were seen after manual vs. mechanical CPR or with and without flail chest.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Quality of Life , Rib Fractures , Thoracic Wall , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Male , Female , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Thoracic Wall/injuries , Thoracic Wall/physiopathology , Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Rib Fractures/physiopathology , Rib Fractures/etiology , Survivors , Adult , Thoracic Injuries/physiopathology , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Fracture Healing/physiology , Flail Chest/etiology , Flail Chest/physiopathology , Sternum/injuries , Sternum/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Norwegian pancreatic cancer disease impact score (PACADI) is a digitalized analogue questionnaire that assesses different disease-specific symptoms. There is a need of translations of it into other languages. Therefore, the aim of this article is to describe the translation process of a Swedish version of PACADI and present its validity to EORCT QLQ PAN26. The self-administered questionnaire PACADI was translated according to guidelines and assessed by an expert panel of health care personnel. The test of its validity was performed with the disease-specific questionnaire for EORCT QLQ PAN26. Both questionnaires were completed by 66 subjects with pancreatic cancer, either before, at discharge or three months after surgery. RESULT: The results between the groups indicate that patients suffer from different symptoms at different times. The correlations between the different symptoms of the two questionnaires were fair to good. In conclusion, PACADI and QLQ PAN 26 have a good correlation and PACADI can be used in clinical practise.
Subject(s)
Language , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden , Translations , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
The majority of post-bariatric patients suffer from excess skin after weight loss, impairing physical, psychosocial and mental health. The abdomen is the most common location for excess skin, and abdominoplasty is the most commonly required reconstructive procedure. Abdominoplasty removes excess abdominal skin and attenuates related symptoms, but knowledge regarding mental health-related effects is scarce. Here, we aimed to evaluate the symptoms and severity of depression before and after abdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients and to analyse the relationships between depressive symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and experience of excess skin. We enrolled 110 former obese patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Three questionnaires evaluating the symptoms of depression (Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)), experience of excess skin (Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ)) and QoL (36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)) were completed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. After abdominoplasty, symptoms of depression (BDI sum score) significantly decreased (5.8 vs. 3.0, p = .037). Scores on three BDI questions improved (p < .05), and the SESQ score normalised (p < .001), while the SF-36 score was unaffected. The BDI sum score was moderately correlated with the SF-36 mental composite score (preoperatively, rs = -0.69; postoperatively, rs = -0.66) and fairly correlated with the SF-36 physical composite score (rs = 0.32, rs = 0.26). The correlation between the BDI sum and SESQ scores was poor preoperatively (rs = -0.106) and fair postoperatively (rs = 0.232). The results indicate that abdominoplasty may reduce symptoms of depression in post-bariatric patients. However, the procedure did not affect SF-36 scores. Further studies are required to validate these results.
