Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi J Med Med Sci ; 12(3): 216-222, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39055080

ABSTRACT

Background: Mechanical ventilation provides essential support for critically ill patients in several diagnoses; however, extubation failure can affect patient outcomes. From Saudi Arabia, no study has assessed the factors associated with extubation failure in adults. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who had been mechanically ventilated via the endotracheal tube for a minimum of 24 hours and then extubated according to the weaning protocol were included. Failed extubation was defined as reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Results: A total of 505 patients were included, of which 72 patients had failed extubation (14.3%, 95% CI: 11.4%-17.7%). Compared with the failed extubation group, the successfully extubated group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference: -2.6 days, 95% CI: -4.3 to -1; P = 0.001), a slower respiratory rate at the time of extubation (mean difference: -2.3 breath/min, 95% CI: -3.8 to -1; P = 0.0005), higher pH (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001-0.04; P = 0.03), and more patients with strong cough (percent difference: 17.7%, 95% CI: 4.8%-30.5%; P = 0.02). Independent risk factors of failed extubation were age (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002-1.03; P = 0.03), respiratory rate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.1; P = 0.008), duration of mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.1; P < 0.001), and pH (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0006-0.5; P = 0.02). Conclusion: Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, faster respiratory rate, and lower pH were found to be independent risk factors that significantly increased the odds of extubation failure among adults.

2.
Saudi J Med Med Sci ; 11(2): 143-149, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252017

ABSTRACT

Background: ICU readmission is associated with poor outcomes. Few studies have directly compared the outcomes of early versus late readmissions, especially in Saudi Arabia. Objective: To compare the outcomes between early and late ICU readmissions, mainly with regards to hospital mortality. Methods: This retrospective study included unique patients who, within the same hospitalization, were admitted to the ICU, discharged to the general wards, and then readmitted to the ICU of King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 01, 2015, and June 30, 2022. Patients readmitted within 2 calendar days were grouped into the Early readmission group, while those readmitted after 2 calendar days were in the Late readmission group. Results: A total of 997 patients were included, of which 753 (75.5%) belonged to the Late group. The mortality rate in the Late group was significantly higher than that in the Early group (37.6% vs. 29.5%, respectively; 95% CI: 1%-14.8%; P = 0.03). The readmission length of stay (LOS) and severity score of both groups were similar. The odds ratio of mortality for the Early group was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51-0.98, P = 0.04); other significant risk factors were age (OR = 1.023, 95% CI: 1.016-1.03; P < 0.001) and readmission LOS (OR = 1.017, 95% CI: 1.009-1.026; P < 0.001). The most common reason for readmission in the Early group was high Modified Early Warning Score, while in the Late group, it was respiratory failure followed by sepsis or septic shock. Conclusion: Compared with late readmission, early readmission was associated with lower mortality, but not with lower LOS or severity score.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...