ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cancer is the most prevalent endocrine cancer worldwide. It is the second most common type of cancer among United Arab Emirates (UAE) women and ranks as the sixth most common type of cancer overall among the UAE population. There are limited studies in the UAE related to thyroid malignancy. This study aimed to determine the pattern of thyroid malignancy among the UAE population and its associated characteristics, with more emphasis on patients categorized as Bethesda III by cytopathology, and furthermore, to determine the significance of advanced diagnostic methods in the assessment of thyroid nodules. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical charts of adult patients (age 18 and above) who were diagnosed with a thyroid nodule by ultrasound during the years 2019 and 2020. It is a comparative study of different variables associated with thyroid nodules and thyroid malignancy. RESULTS: A total of 1072 patients were diagnosed with thyroid nodules upon initial ultrasound. We had 174 patients diagnosed with thyroid malignancy, constituting 16% (95% CI 0.14-0.19) of the total study population. 78% of the thyroid malignancy patients were women as compared to men, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.042). Non-UAE nationals comprised 61% of the population diagnosed with thyroid malignancy (95% CI 1.37-2.68). Malignancy was found to be more common in patients with multinodular goiter, in the 30 to 39-year age group, and in patients with high ultrasound and Bethesda grades. From the total study population, 140 patients had cytology reports in the Bethesda III category. Thyroid malignancy was found in 30 patients with Bethesda III, and this comprised 17% of the total population who were diagnosed with thyroid malignancy. CONCLUSION: Despite being a single-center study, it highlights the percentage of thyroid malignancy and its associated factors among the UAE population. Thyroid ultrasound grading and Bethesda classification guide physicians in risk stratification, but it remains challenging in patients who fall into the Bethesda III category. Intervention versus regular follow-up should not depend on a single value but on the overall clinical picture and the use of advanced diagnostic methods.
