Efficacy of subgingival minocycline hydrochloride delivery as an adjunct to non-surgical mechanical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the efficacy of subgingival minocycline hydrochloride (MH) delivery with non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) for treating peri-implantitis in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Type-2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with peri-implantitis were included. In the test-group, patients underwent NSMD with a single session of MH delivery. In the control-group, patients underwent NSMD alone. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), modified plaque-index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI), probing-depth (PD) and crestal bone loss (CBL) were measured at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Level of significance was set at p<0.01. RESULTS: Thirty type-2 diabetic and 30 healthy individuals with peri-implantitis were included. There was a significant reduction in mPI (p<0.01), PD (p<0.01) and mGI (p<0.01) at 6 months among patients with and without type-2 DM in the test and control groups. There was no significant difference in peri-implant parameters in all patients at the 6-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in HbA1c and CBL among patients with and without type-2 DM in the test and control groups when baseline values were compared with those at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A single application of subgingival MH delivery is as effective as NSMD alone for the treatment of peri-implantitis in type-2 diabetic patients.

Efficacy of adjunct subgingival minocycline delivery for treatment of peri-implantitis in moderate cigarette smokers.

OBJECTIVE: Localized subgingival minocycline hydrochloride (MH) delivery as an adjuvant to with non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) is useful for the treatment of periodontitis; however, there are no trials that have assessed the efficacy of subgingival MH delivery with NSMD for the treatment of peri-implantitis in cigarette-smokers and non-smokers. This randomized controlled trial assessed the efficacy of subgingival MH delivery with NSMD for the treatment of peri-implantitis in cigarette-smokers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Self-reported current cigarette-smokers and non-smokers with peri-implantitis were encompassed. These individuals were subdivided into 2-subgroups. Patients in test- and control groups received NSMD with and without a single delivery of subgingival MH. Modified-gingival-index (mGI), modified-plaque-index (mPI), probing-depth (PD) and crestal-bone-loss (CBL) were measured at baseline and at 6-months' follow-up. Demographic-data was also collected. Level of significance was set at p<0.01. RESULTS: Twenty-four cigarette-smokers and 24 non-smokers with peri-implantitis were included. There was a significant reduction in mPI (p<0.01), mGI (p<0.01), PD (p<0.01) at 6-months among patients with and without type-2 DM in test- and control-groups. There was no significant difference in peri-implant mPI, PD and mGI, patients with and without type-2 diabetes in test- and control-groups at 6-months of follow-up. There was no significant difference in CBL in all patients at 6-months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A single application of subgingival MH delivery is as effective as NSMD alone for the treatment of peri-implantitis in cigarette-smokers and non-smokers.

Knowledge attitude and practice of safety measures for corona virus disease - 19 (COVID-19) among general population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of general population for Corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19). METHODS: A total of 950 participants submitted an online self-administered questionnaire, which was developed through literature search and validated. The online survey link was distributed through various social media platforms (WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Snapchat, Pinterest, and Tumblr). And 861 forms were included in the study after checking for completion of relevant response from participants, whereas 89 forms were excluded. The data were analyzed through Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Descriptive statistics were performed for percentage and frequency determination of quantitative and qualitative variables. Spearman's correlation and Chi square test were performed to control confounders and association of knowledge, attitude, and practices with gender and education level. The P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: More than two third of the population was aware of COVID-19 and three fourth had had bachelor's degrees, whereas 18% had master level education. 85% have not attended any courses, awareness campaigns, and lectures to inculcate recent and updated knowledge. 83% believed that COVID-19 is a serious threat to the community; hence, prevention strategies should be adopted. There was no significant relationship (p = 0.23) between knowledge, attitude, and practice levels with gender, whereas a significant relationship (p = 0.01) was noted with education of participant. Similarly, a significant relationship (p = 0.00) was seen between knowledge and practices of participants toward COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The studied population displayed adequate knowledge, attitude, and practice to combat COVID-19. However, we also find a knowledge gap between information source and perception of COVID-19 among our study participants. Therefore, there is a critical need for effective education and widespread public campaigns aiming to enhance relevant and contemporary information related to prevention and management of COVID-19.