ABSTRACT
Background: Alveolar periosteoplasty during primary repair of cleft lip is still a topic of debate due to the fear exacerbating maxillary retrusion. The authors present their experience with early closure of alveolar clefts. The study aims to analyze gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) by comparing the use of locoregional flaps versus distant grafts for reconstruction of the lower layer of the primary palate cleft. Methods: Seventeen infants underwent 22 alveolar cleft repairs. After nasal floor repair by nasal mucoperiosteum, the oral layer was repaired by maxillary or gingival periosteal flaps in seven patients with alveolar clefts less than or equal to 6 mm wide, and tibial or pericranial periosteal grafts in 10 patients with wider clefts. At teenage years, crossbites in three flap-GPP and three graft-GPP patients were compared with nine older adolescents without primary GPP. Results: Alveolar clefts were perfectly sealed. Radiographs during the early 3 postoperative years showed new bone formation more posteriorly extended in patients who underwent graft-GPP. Teeth eruption and alveolar rigidity at the mixed dentition age eliminated the need for secondary bone grafting. The anterior crossbites in adolescent patients ranged between -2 and -14 mm; crossing was relatively smaller in patients with a younger age and without cleft palate. The mean crossbite was 7.2 mm in the six teenagers and 9.6 mm in the control cases. Conclusions: Graft-GPP may be a good alternative to flap-GPP, particularly for wide alveolar cleft repair. Maxillary retrusion is aggravated in patients with cleft palate and older age at assessment. GPP may not increase crossbite.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This report describes the removal of a missed impacted large piece of a glass that reaches the infra-temporal region after a traumatic injury at the submandibular area. CASE PRESENTATION: A nine year-old patient presented with a limited mouth opening (0.5 cm). Initial examination showed a scar of an old trauma in the submandibular area two months prior to presentation. The radiographic study showed a large knife-shaped foreign body with its tip at the infra-temporal region, and its base at the submandibular region. Further multi-slice computed tomography with angiography was done that showed close proximity of the foreign body to the branches of the external carotid artery; maxillary, lingual and facial branches. The foreign body was removed via extra-oral approach through the old scar of the past injury under general anesthesia. Dissection, exposure of the external carotid artery and preparing it for emergency ligation, were done before extraction of the foreign body. The patient's mouth opening increased to 2.5 cm without any complications. CONCLUSION: Cut wounds in the face should not be repaired in the primary care without detailed history, systematic examination and proper investigations.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Robinow Syndrome is an extremely rare genetic disorder characterised by abnormalities in head, face and external genitalia. This disorder exists in dominant pattern with moderate symptoms and recessive pattern with more physical and skeletal abnormalities. It was first introduced by Menihard Robinow in 1969. It was related to chromosome 9q22 ROR2 gene related to bone and cartilage growth aspects. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old Egyptian male presented to National Research Centre Orodental genetics Clinic with typical features of short stature and facial dysmorphism weighted 50 Kg and measured 150 cm height complaining of facial dis figurement. There was no significant prenatal history, and family history was negative for congenital disabilities and genetic disorders. Clinical examination revealed macrocephaly and special facial features as prominent forehead, deformed ear pinna, hypertelorism, flat nasal tongue tie, deficient malar bone, bow-shaped upper and lower lips and dimpled chin. Orally the patient suffered from tonetie, gingival hypertrophy and dental malalignment. The orthopantomogram showed multiple impacted teeth. The physical examination revealed that the patient had deformed spine, short limbs with ectrodactyly, micropenis & hypospadias. Surgical management included correction of midface deficiency with zygomatic augmentation, closed rhinoplasty for the broad nose, lips muscles release and tongue tie relief. The patient is currently undergoing orthodontic treatment for his teeth. CONCLUSION: Improvement of facial features and a good psychological impact on the patient and his family.
