Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

The biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved in the role of tumor micro-environment stress in development of drug resistance.

BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer and it continues to be a challenge in cancer treatment. Moreover, the tumor micro-environment is essential to the formation of drug resistant cancers. Recent evidence indicates that the tumor micro-environment is a critical regulator of cancer progression, distant metastasis and acquired resistance of tumors to various therapies. Despite significant advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the development of therapeutic resistance leads to reduced drug efficacy. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This review highlights mechanistic aspects of the biochemistry of the tumor micro-enviroment, such as the hypoglycaemia, reactive oxygen species (ROS), hypoxia and their effects in propagating MDR. This is achieved through: (A) increased survival via autophagy and failure of apoptosis; (B) altered metabolic processing; and (C) reduction in drug delivery and uptake or increased drug efflux. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The development of MDR in cancer has been demonstrated to be majorly influenced by naturally occurring stressors within the tumor micro-environment, as well as chemotherapeutics. Thus, the tumor micro-environment is currently emerging as a major focus of research which needs to be carefully addressed before cancer can be successfully treated. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Elucidating the biochemical mechanisms which promote MDR is essential in development of effective therapeutics that can overcome these acquired defences in cancer cells.

Coupling of the polyamine and iron metabolism pathways in the regulation of proliferation: Mechanistic links to alterations in key polyamine biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes.

Many biological processes result from the coupling of metabolic pathways. Considering this, proliferation depends on adequate iron and polyamines, and although iron-depletion impairs proliferation, the metabolic link between iron and polyamine metabolism has never been thoroughly investigated. This is important to decipher, as many disease states demonstrate co-dysregulation of iron and polyamine metabolism. Herein, for the first time, we demonstrate that cellular iron levels robustly regulate 13 polyamine pathway proteins. Seven of these were regulated in a conserved manner by iron-depletion across different cell-types, with four proteins being down-regulated (i.e., acireductone dioxygenase 1 [ADI1], methionine adenosyltransferase 2α [MAT2α], Antizyme and polyamine oxidase [PAOX]) and three proteins being up-regulated (i.e., S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase [AMD1], Antizyme inhibitor 1 [AZIN1] and spermidine/spermine-N1-acetyltransferase 1 [SAT1]). Depletion of iron also markedly decreased polyamine pools (i.e., spermidine and/or spermine, but not putrescine). Accordingly, iron-depletion also decreased S-adenosylmethionine that is essential for spermidine/spermine biosynthesis. Iron-depletion additionally reduced 3H-spermidine uptake in direct agreement with the lowered levels of the polyamine importer, SLC22A16. Regarding mechanism, the "reprogramming" of polyamine metabolism by iron-depletion is consistent with the down-regulation of ADI1 and MAT2α, and the up-regulation of SAT1. Moreover, changes in ADI1 (biosynthetic) and SAT1 (catabolic) partially depended on the iron-regulated changes in c-Myc and/or p53. The ability of iron chelators to inhibit proliferation was rescuable by putrescine and spermidine, and under some conditions by spermine. Collectively, iron and polyamine metabolism are intimately coupled, which has significant ramifications for understanding the integrated role of iron and polyamine metabolism in proliferation.

Tumor stressors induce two mechanisms of intracellular P-glycoprotein-mediated resistance that are overcome by lysosomal-targeted thiosemicarbazones.

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major obstacle in cancer treatment due to the ability of tumor cells to efflux chemotherapeutics via drug transporters (e.g. P-glycoprotein (Pgp; ABCB1)). Although the mechanism of Pgp-mediated drug efflux is known at the plasma membrane, the functional role of intracellular Pgp is unclear. Moreover, there has been intense focus on the tumor micro-environment as a target for cancer treatment. This investigation aimed to dissect the effects of tumor micro-environmental stress on subcellular Pgp expression, localization, and its role in MDR. These studies demonstrated that tumor micro-environment stressors (i.e. nutrient starvation, low glucose levels, reactive oxygen species, and hypoxia) induce Pgp-mediated drug resistance. This occurred by two mechanisms, where stressors induced 1) rapid Pgp internalization and redistribution via intracellular trafficking (within 1 h) and 2) hypoxia-inducible factor-1α expression after longer incubations (4-24 h), which up-regulated Pgp and was accompanied by lysosomal biogenesis. These two mechanisms increased lysosomal Pgp and facilitated lysosomal accumulation of the Pgp substrate, doxorubicin, resulting in resistance. This was consistent with lysosomal Pgp being capable of transporting substrates into lysosomes. Hence, tumor micro-environmental stressors result in: 1) Pgp redistribution to lysosomes; 2) increased Pgp expression; 3) lysosomal biogenesis; and 4) potentiation of Pgp substrate transport into lysosomes. In contrast to doxorubicin, when stress stimuli increased lysosomal accumulation of the cytotoxic Pgp substrate, di-2-pyridylketone 4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (Dp44mT), this resulted in the agent overcoming resistance. Overall, this investigation describes a novel approach to overcoming resistance in the stressful tumor micro-environment.