Emergent pediatric US: what every radiologist should know.

Appendicitis, intussusception, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) are three of the most common reasons for emergent abdominal imaging in pediatric patients. Although the use of computed tomography has risen dramatically over the past 2 decades, children are particularly at risk for the adverse effects of ionizing radiation, and even low-dose radiation is associated with a small but significant increase in lifetime risk of fatal cancer. In most emergency departments, the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a primary modality for the evaluation of a child with abdominal pain remains impractical due to its high cost, its limited availability, and the frequent need for sedation. Ultrasonography (US) does not involve ionizing radiation and, unlike MR imaging, is relatively inexpensive, is widely available, and does not require sedation. Another major advantage of US in abdominal imaging is that it allows dynamic assessment of bowel peristalsis and compressibility. Delayed diagnosis of any of the aforementioned disease processes can lead to serious morbidity and, in some cases, death. The ability to diagnose or exclude disease with US should be part of a core radiology skill set for any practice that includes a pediatric population.

Abbreviated MRI for patients presenting to the emergency department with hip pain.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of two abbreviated hip MRI protocols--coronal STIR images only and coronal STIR with coronal T1-weighted images--as compared with a full hip MRI protocol in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hip pain and negative radiographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 385 patients (277 females, 108 males; mean age, 61 years; age range, 16-99 years) who underwent MRI within 1 month of negative radiographs obtained for ED evaluation of hip pain between January 2000 and March 2009. MR examinations were graded independently by two musculoskeletal fellowship-trained emergency radiologists for detection of fracture, avascular necrosis (AVN), and muscle injury in three subsets: coronal STIR images only; coronal STIR images and coronal T1-weighted images; and the full examination. RESULTS: MRI detected findings suspicious for fracture in 42% (162/385) of patients, for AVN in 9% (33/385), and for muscle injury in 35% (134/385). The sensitivity and specificity of STIR alone in raising concern for fracture was 99% (220/223) for both readers, with small incremental benefits of adding coronal T1-weighted images. For AVN, specificity was 100% (28/28) with STIR alone, but the addition of coronal T1-weighted images provided substantial benefit by increasing sensitivity from 85% (28/33) to 97% (32/33). For muscle injury, sensitivity and specificity exceeded 95% (128/134) for both abbreviated examinations. CONCLUSION: An abbreviated MRI protocol including coronal STIR and coronal T1-weighted images has high sensitivity and specificity for fracture, AVN, and muscle injury in ED patients presenting with hip pain and negative radiographs.

Imaging of trauma in a pregnant patient.

Trauma is the number one nonobstetric cause of maternal death. This chapter presents the latest consensus from the literature on the best approach to radiographic imaging of these patients. The central issues of discussion include the rationale and protocols for screening for pregnancy in trauma setting; the effects of radiation and its risks to the fetus; obtaining informed consent; how to estimate fetal dose; and the role of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, including the intravenous contrast agents used for the assessment of abdominal trauma. The team approach to the management of these patients is also highlighted.

Abdominal anaphylaxis presenting as trauma: a recipe for delayed diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Successful shock management requires prompt identification, classification, and treatment; however, the triage of patients with non-hemorrhagic shock to the trauma room can lead to delayed diagnosis with increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to emphasize the importance of shock identification and classification to facilitate the delivery of the appropriate and timely therapy, no matter how the patient is triaged. CASE REPORT: We describe a patient triaged as a trauma patient with suspected hemorrhagic shock yet who was found to have anaphylaxis as the etiology of his condition. Abdominal anaphylaxis, a less recognized presentation of anaphylaxis, is reviewed and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We hope to increase awareness of a less common presentation of anaphylaxis and discuss its management.