Primary Bone Tumors in North of Jordan.

OBJECTIVE: Primary tumors of bone are relatively uncommon. Little information is available about the etiology, pathophysiology, risk factors and epidemiologic features of bone tumors. In this article, we present the epidemiological data about the primary (benign and malignant) bone tumors in Jordan. METHODS: Retrospectively, we identified and assessed those patients who were diagnosed with primary bone tumor between January 2004 and December 2018 at King Abdullah University Hospital. The following information was obtained: demographics (age, sex), clinical presentation, and location of the tumor. Also, the histopathological results and finding and recurrence of the tumors were retrieved. The included primary bone tumors were those tumors fulfill the World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumors. RESULTS: During the study period, four-hundred and thirty-seven cases of the primary bone tumor were diagnosed in our institution. More than half of the cases were males (52.5% males and 47.5% females). In most cases, young adults are affected. The mean age for the diagnosis of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is 34.1 years. The appendicular skeleton was involved in 269 (81.5%) patients while the axial skeleton in 60 patients. The most common encountered pathology is the multiple myeloma with 120 patients. After that, osteochondroma was diagnosed in 110 patients. Females were mostly affected by giant cell tumor while the osteochondroma and chondrosarcoma were seen mostly in males. Multiple myeloma tends to develop in elderly while juvenile ossifying fibroma occurred in young pediatrics and Ewing sarcoma in school-age children and adolescents. Giant cell tumor and osteoid osteoma have the tendency to recur. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of primary bone tumors is of particular important. The reporting of epidemiological studies is essential in order to expand our knowledge regarding this uncommon type of tumors.

Successful Anesthetic Management in Cesarean Section for Pregnant Woman with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND The current COVID-19 pandemic highlights the importance of the mindful use of financial and human resources. Preventing infections and preserving resources and manpower are crucial in healthcare. It is important to ensure the ability of surgeons and specialized interventionalists to function through the pandemic. Until now, no justified protocol has been reported for the anesthetic management in cesarean section (CS). CASE REPORT A 29-year-old pregnant woman, G2P1 at 37+4 weeks of gestation, was referred to our center on March 28, 2020, after she had tested positive for COVID-19. She was stable and the CS was planned after she reached term. Through spinal anesthesia, CS was conducted. The anesthesia team was protected with full personal protection equipment. The operation was carried out smoothly without complication. A female neonate was delivered and was tested to be negative for COVID-19. No medical staff cross-infection was reported. CONCLUSIONS Special precautions should be considered when pregnant women are undergoing CS. Spinal anesthesia is preferred over general anesthesia.

Transient Osteoporosis of the Hip: Risk and Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of occupation in patients with transient osteoporosis of the hip (TOH). The study also compares two different types of management for this condition: conservative treatment and surgical drilling. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series study. The medical records for patients diagnosed with TOH at our institution within the period 2012-2017 were retrieved. General demographic data, clinical features, and diagnostic modalities were obtained. In addition, management procedures and their associated prognostic factors were acquired. The effectiveness of these procedures was assessed by the number of days of sick leave, the time needed for full recovery and the number of recurrences of TOH. Also, pain responses at 24 hrs, 48 hrs, and at 1 week were estimated subjectively through a "pain score" out of 10, and objectively through the degree of improvement in daily activity. The patients had a regular follow-up at 4- to 6-week intervals. RESULTS: In total, 15 cases of TOH, 14 men and one woman, were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 41 years (range 26-59 years). Out of the 15 cases, nine were healthcare professionals (eight physicians and one nurse). Ten patients underwent hip drilling for core decompression and five patients were treated conservatively. The time needed for full recovery was 5.8 weeks for those who underwent drilling, and 48.3 weeks for three patients receiving conservative treatment. The other two patients who were treated conservatively had not achieved full or near-full recovery at the time of reporting this study. CONCLUSION: Physicians may be at increased risk of developing TOH. Further studies should be conducted to examine the role of this occupation as a risk factor. In addition, hip drilling should be considered as an effective treatment modality, especially in those patients who seek a faster recovery.