Role of allograft nephrectomy following kidney graft failure: preliminary experience with pre-operative angiographic kidney embolization.

INTRODUCTION: Allograft nephrectomy (AN) is not without morbidity following graft failure (GF) in kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: Single center retrospective review of all adult patients undergoing AN following KT, including a subset of patients who underwent pre-operative angiographic kidney embolization (PAKE). RESULTS: Over a 104 month period, 853 adult patients underwent deceased donor KT. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 174 patients (20.4%) developed GF and 38/174 (21.8%) underwent AN. The rate of AN was higher in patients with delayed graft function [DGF, Odds Ratio (OR) 2.15, p = 0.023] and early GF (OR 1.7, p = 0.064). For patients undergoing PAKE (n = 13, mean timing of AN 27.5 months post-KT), the estimated intra-operative blood loss was reduced from a mean of 375 ± 530 to 100 ± 162 ml (p < 0.10), mean peri-operative transfusion requirements were reduced from 3.36 ± 4.8 to 0.23 ± 0.44 units (p < 0.05), and total mean operating time was reduced from 192 ± 114 to 141 ± 38 min (p = NS) compared to 13 control patients undergoing AN in the absence of vascular thrombosis or PAKE. Mean length of hospital stay was decreased from 8.5 ± 9 to 5.5 ± 3 days (p = NS) in patients with PAKE. Surgical complication and infection rates and hospital charges were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed graft function and early GF are associated with a higher rate of AN. PAKE may result in less blood loss, fewer transfusions, reduced operating time, and shorter length of stay, which may translate into reductions in morbidity.

Treatment options for renal cell carcinoma in renal allografts: a case series from a single institution.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is more common in renal transplant and dialysis patients than the general population. However, RCC in transplanted kidneys is rare, and treatment has previously consisted of nephrectomy with a return to dialysis. There has been recent interest in nephron-sparing procedures as a treatment option for RCC in allograft kidneys in an effort to retain allograft function. Four patients with RCC in allograft kidneys were treated with nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, or radiofrequency ablation. All of the patients are without evidence of recurrence of RCC after treatment. We found nephron-sparing procedures to be reasonable initial options in managing incidental RCCs diagnosed in functioning allografts to maintain an improved quality of life and avoid immediate dialysis compared with radical nephrectomy of a functioning allograft. However, in non-functioning renal allografts, radical nephrectomy may allow for a higher chance of cure without the loss of transplant function. Consequently, radical nephrectomy should be utilized whenever the allograft is non-functioning and the patient's surgical risk is not prohibitive.

Novel concepts in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma.

The understanding of renal cell carcinoma has undergone significant advances in the past several years. These have included advances in imaging procedures and surgical approaches, allowing for more precise staging, and individualized approaches to therapy. Furthermore, there has been an increase in the diagnosis of incidental tumors and currently the majority of RCCs are incidentally diagnosed on routing imaging procedures. In this manuscript, we review the surgical options for renal cell carcinoma with specific emphasis on the algorithm for approaching these tumors, in order to ensure maximal cancer specific survival, without threatening the overall renal function.