Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 96(3): 369-75, 2005 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16054460

ABSTRACT

The Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) has been shown to predict mortality in women who have symptomatic heart disease, but its ability to do so in asymptomatic women is unknown, as is its comparative advantage to exercise capacity. We investigated whether a decreased DTS is associated with increased mortality in a prospective cohort of 5,636 asymptomatic women. A symptom-limited exercise treadmill test using Bruce's protocol was performed at baseline. DTS was calculated using exercise time, exercise-induced angina, and ST-segment depression. Exercise capacity was measured in METs. Deaths and cause of death were identified from 1992 to 2000. After adjusting for the Framingham Risk Score, the risk of death decreased by 9% for each unit increase in DTS and by 17% for every 1-MET increase (p <0.001). Those who had a DTS <5 (moderate or high risk) had hazard ratios for death and cardiac death that were 2.2 and 2.5 times greater, respectively, than did those who had a DTS > or =5 (low risk), after adjusting for Framingham Risk Score (p <0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curves for the DTS model and the exercise capacity model were not significantly different. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that, although the DTS is an independent predictor of mortality and cardiac mortality in asymptomatic women, it does not appear to be a better predictor than exercise capacity alone. The role of ST-segment changes and symptoms with stress testing in asymptomatic women does not provide additional prognostic information.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/mortality , Exercise Test , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Exercise Tolerance , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis
2.
Circulation ; 108(13): 1554-9, 2003 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12975254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women and accounts for more than half of their deaths. Women have been underrepresented in most studies of cardiovascular disease. Reduced physical fitness has been shown to increase the risk of death in men. Exercise capacity measured by exercise stress test is an objective measure of physical fitness. The hypothesis that reduced exercise capacity is associated with an increased risk of death was investigated in a cohort of 5721 asymptomatic women who underwent baseline examinations in 1992. METHODS AND RESULTS: Information collected at baseline included medical and family history, demographic characteristics, physical examination, and symptom-limited stress ECG, using the Bruce protocol. Exercise capacity was measured in metabolic equivalents (MET). Nonfasting blood was analyzed at baseline. A National Death Index search was performed to identify all-cause death and date of death up to the end of 2000. The mean age of participants at baseline was 52+/-11 years. Framingham Risk Score-adjusted hazards ratios (with 95% CI) of death associated with MET levels of <5, 5 to 8, and >8 were 3.1 (2.0 to 4.7), 1.9 (1.3 to 2.9), and 1.00, respectively. The Framingham Risk Score-adjusted mortality risk decreased by 17% for every 1-MET increase. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort of asymptomatic women studied in this context over the longest period of follow-up. This study confirms that exercise capacity is an independent predictor of death in asymptomatic women, greater than what has been previously established among men. The implications for clinical practice and health care policy are far reaching.


Subject(s)
Exercise Tolerance , Mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Exercise Test , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
3.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 5(1): 38-46, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12556652

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is an important, modifiable risk for cardiovascular disease. The Women Take Heart study, a prospective, community-based cohort study of risk factors for heart disease, provides an opportunity to examine prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension specifically in women. In 1992, 5932 women, age 35 and older (mean age, 52.9; 86% white, 9% African American, 5% other) and free of active heart disease symptoms for 3 months, were recruited through Chicago area public announcements, and their baseline examination data analyzed. Overall, 47.6% were hypertensive (systolic blood pressure >or=140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >or=90 mm Hg, or self-report). Only 17.3% reported being hypertensive; in 63.2% of all hypertensive women, the hypertension was undetected or unacknowledged. Blood pressure was controlled to <140/90 mm Hg in 24.1% of self-reported hypertensives. Results from this study and national surveys indicate that hypertension detection and control remain major public health challenges in preventing cardiovascular disease in older women.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Hypertension/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chi-Square Distribution , Chicago/epidemiology , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Logistic Models , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...