Causes of Death Among Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the US From 2000 to 2016.

Importance: Owing to improved survival among US patients with prostate cancer (PC), patients tend to live long enough after a PC diagnosis for non-cancer-related comorbidities to be associated with their overall survival. Although studies have investigated causes of death among patients with localized PC, data are lacking regarding causes of death among patients with metastatic PC. Objective: To assess causes of death among US patients with metastatic PC from 2000 to 2016. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database to analyze a sample of 26 168 US men who received a diagnosis of metastatic PC from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from February 2 to July 28, 2020. Exposure: Diagnosis of metastatic PC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for different causes of death were calculated by dividing the observed number of deaths from each cause of death by the expected number of deaths in the age-matched US male population for the same period, adjusting for age and race/ethnicity. Results: Of 26 168 patients with metastatic PC included in the analysis, 48.9% were aged 50 to 70 years (mean age at diagnosis, 70.83 years); 74.5% were White individuals, and 72.7% received a diagnosis of stage M1b metastatic PC. A total of 16 732 patients (63.9%) died during the follow-up period. The mean age at death was 74.13 years. Most deaths (59.0%) occurred within the latency period of 2 years after diagnosis of metastatic PC, whereas 31.6% occurred 2 to 5 years after diagnosis and 9.4% occurred more than 5 years after diagnosis. Of the total deaths, 13 011 (77.8%) were from PC, 924 (5.5%) were from other cancers, and 2797 (16.7%) were from noncancer causes. During all latency periods, the most common noncancer causes of death were cardiovascular diseases (SMR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.26-1.42), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (SMR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.36), and cerebrovascular diseases (SMR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.50). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, deaths from noncancer causes, including cardiovascular disease, constituted a substantial number of deaths among men with metastatic PC. Therapy and follow-up should be tailored to the needs of each patient with metastatic PC, and counseling regarding future health risks should be provided.

Causes of Death Following Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in the U.S.: A Population-Based Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Because of the improved colorectal cancer (CRC) survival in the U.S., patients may live long enough after CRC diagnosis to the point where non-cancer-related comorbidities may considerably impact their overall survival. In this study, we perform a long-term analysis of causes of death (CODs) following nonmetastatic CRC with respect to different demographic and tumor-related criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We gained access to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to review patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC during 2000-2015. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for each COD following CRC. SMRs represented the change of risk of a specific COD following CRC diagnoses when compared with the risk in the general U.S. RESULTS: We reviewed 302,345 patients, of whom 112,008 died during the study period. More deaths (68.3%) occurred within 5 years following nonmetastatic CRC diagnosis, with 76,486 deaths. CRC was the most common COD (51.4%) within 5 years of diagnosis followed by heart disease (15.2%) and other cancers (8.4%). As time passed after diagnosis, the number of CRC deaths decreased, and other noncancer causes increased to the point that after 10 years only 10.4% of deaths were attributed to CRC, 15.3% were attributed to other cancers, and 34.2% were secondary to heart disease. CONCLUSION: Following nonmetastatic CRC diagnosis, most deaths remain secondary to CRC. Other causes, including other cancers and cardiovascular disease, represent a significant number of deaths, especially in the 5 years following initial CRC diagnosis. Our findings help guide counseling patients with CRC regarding future health risks. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Most common causes of death following nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are heart diseases, other cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cerebrovascular diseases. Physicians should counsel patients regarding survivorship with cancer screening and focus on prevention of noncancer deaths. These findings should be considered by physicians who give care for survivors of nonmetastatic CRC.

Epidemiology of Cholangiocarcinoma; United States Incidence and Mortality Trends.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with few available studies assessing incidence and mortality. In this study, we aim to investigate trends of incidence and mortality in a large nation-wide epidemiologic study. METHODS: We used SEER 18 database to study cholangiocarcinoma cases in the US during 2000-2015. Incidence and mortality rates of cholangiocarcinoma were calculated by race and were expressed by 1,000,000 person-years. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated using joinpoint regression software. RESULTS: We reviewed 16,189 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, of which 64.4% were intrahepatic. Most patients were whites (78.4%), males (51.3%), and older than 65 years (63%). A total of 13,121 patients died of cholangiocarcinoma during the study period. Cholangiocarcinoma incidence and mortality were 11.977 and 10.295 and were both higher among Asians, males, and individuals older than 65 years. Incidence rates have significantly increased over the study period (APC=5.063%, P<.001), while mortality increased significantly over the study period (APC=5.964%, P<.001), but decreased after 2013 (APC=-25.029, P<.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence and mortality of cholangiocarcinoma were increasing in the study period with significant observed disparities based on race and gender.

Temporal trends of incidence and mortality in Asian-Americans with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with an estimated 45,750 deaths in 2019. Mortality outcomes seem to differ based on the ethnicity of the patients, with most studies focusing on the mortality and survival of Caucasians and African Americans. Little attention has been given, however, to Asian-American patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). In this study, we aimed to investigate mortality rates in Asian-American patients with PAC. METHODS: The SEER 13 registries (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results) of the National Cancer Institute were used to study PAC cases during 1992-2015. The incidence and incidence-based mortality rates per 100,000 person-years, and the annual percentage changes were calculated using SEER*stat software and Joinpoint regression software. RESULTS: A total of 5814 PAC cases in Asian-American patients were identified. Most patients were older than 60 years (77.6%) and had metastatic disease (55.8%). The overall incidence of PAC among Asian-Americans was 5.740 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.592-5.891]. Incidence rates were highest among males and patients older than 60 years. PAC incidence rates among Asian-Americans increased by 1.503% (95%CI 1.051-1.956; P<0.001) per year over the study period. PAC incidence rates increased over the study period for all sex, age, and stage subgroups. PAC incidence-based mortality among Asian-Americans increased by 4.535% (95%CI 3.538-5.541; P<0.001) per year over the study period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of PAC in Asian-Americans, as well as incidence-based mortality rates, are on the rise, irrespective of age, sex or stage subgroup.

The risk of melanoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia; a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Melanoma is a highly malignant tumor that has been repeatedly reported in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. We aim to assess the epidemiologic characteristics of this association and emphasize the importance of carefully approaching such cases. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with CLL between 2000 and 2015 and registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database of the US National Cancer Institute were identified using the SEER*stat software (version 8.3.5). The Multiple Primary Standardized Incidence Ratios session of the SEER*stat software (version 8.3.5) was used to calculate the observed/expected (O/E) ratios of melanoma. RESULTS: 48,876 CLL cases were reviewed, of which 474 developed a second primary melanoma of the skin. O/E ratio was 2.07 (95% CI 1.89-2.27), and excess risk was 9.7 per 10,000. The increase in melanoma risk was higher within the first 5 years following CLL diagnosis; O/E = 2.22 (95% CI 1.56-2.14) and excess risk was 10.43 per 10,000. It was higher in males compared to females O/E was 2.10 (95% CI 1.89-2.33) and 1.98 (95% CI 1.62-2.40) in males and females, respectively, and in people aged 45-64; O/E = 2.30 (95% CI 1.95-2.70). Out of 7827 CLL patients receiving chemotherapy, 70 later developed melanoma with a significant O/E of 2.28 (95% CI 1.77-2.88) and an excess risk of 10.66 per 10,000. CONCLUSION: CLL increases the risk of developing melanoma, especially within 5 years of the diagnosis, and in white males aged between 45-64 years. It is crucial to keep rigorous screening, high-suspicion and close follow-up for recurrence in consideration while managing these patients.

Does a history of malignancy impact the survival of a subsequent endometrial adenocarcinoma? Should clinical trials eligibility criteria be revisited?

We aimed at finding the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma using SEER database (from 1973 to 2014). We identified 127,988 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma (6485 had a prior malignancy), and we compared the overall and cancer-specific survival based on the presence or absence of a prior malignancy and the latency period between the two diagnoses using Kaplan-Meier test and Cox models. Adjusted cox models showed that a history of a prior malignancy neither affected the overall survival nor the cancer-specific survival of stage IV cases in all latency groups except the one diagnosed within 1 year of the first cancer. Therefore, there is no rational explanation for excluding stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma patients with a prior malignancy from clinical trials except for the group that was diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma within 1 year from the first cancer.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Not enough evidence is found on the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with subsequent endometrial adenocarcinoma.What do the results of this study add? History of a prior malignancy neither affects the overall survival of stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma nor the cancer-specific survival. Only patients who had their second malignancy diagnosed within one year of the first malignancy should be excluded from clinical trials, while patients diagnosed within one to five years of the first cancer should be encouraged to enrol in clinical trials as they have an enhanced survival than patients without a history of malignancy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We recommend that future researchers should consider including the aforementioned group of patients in their trials to achieve more accurate results and in order not to strip the patients of potential therapeutic benefits of enrolling in clinical trials.

Temporal trends of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in young adults in the United States: A Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an uncommon yet fatal malignancy with numerous recent reports detailing a significant increase in the overall incidence lately. However, there is limited literature on recent incidence rates of the disease in young individuals. In this study we evaluate PDAC incidence in the US among young patients. METHODS: Data from 2000 to 2017 was obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results 'SEER' database and analyzed using the SEER*stat software. The overall incidence, incidence trends, and survival were calculated. RESULTS: We selected 667 PDAC patients who met our inclusion criteria. We found the incidence of PDAC among young individuals to be 1.016 (95% CI, 0.940-1.096) per 1,000,000 person-years. Incidence rates were stable over the study period. Higher incidence was found among males [1.240 (95% CI, 1.122-1.366)] and blacks [1.226 (95% CI, 0.999-1.490)]. The 5-year relative survival of young patients with PDAC was 6.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Among young adults, pancreatic cancer incidence has been stable over the study duration. However, disparities between subpopulations exist and further studies are warranted to better understand those observed differences.

Causes of death after breast cancer diagnosis: A US population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: The focus on noncancer causes of death in patients with breast cancer (BC) remains superficial. The objective of the current study was to assess and quantify causes of death after BC diagnosis. METHODS: In total, 754,270 women with BC in the United States who were diagnosed during 2000 through 2015 and retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were studied. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for causes of death were calculated. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 183,002 (24.3%) died during the follow-up period. The greatest proportion of deaths (46.2%) occurred within 1 to 5 years after diagnosis. Most deaths occurred from BC itself or from other cancers, and the number of BC deaths decreased as more years passed after diagnosis. The most common noncancer causes of death within <10 years after diagnosis were heart diseases followed by cerebrovascular diseases. However, >10 years after diagnosis, the most common noncancer causes of death were heart diseases followed by Alzheimer disease. Patients had a statistically significant higher risk of death from chronic liver diseases within 5 to 10 years after diagnosis compared with the general population (SMR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38) and had statistically significant higher risks of death from Alzheimer disease (SMR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) and from diseases of the heart (SMR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) >10 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although BC remains the most common cause of death after BC diagnosis, other non-BC causes of death (mainly heart and cerebrovascular diseases) represent a significant number of deaths among patients with BC. These findings provide important insight into how BC survivors should be counselled regarding future health risks.

Impact of prior malignancies on outcome of colorectal cancer; revisiting clinical trial eligibility criteria.

BACKGROUND: Most clinical trials on colorectal cancer (CRC) exclude cases who have history of a prior malignancy. However, no prior research studied this history's actual impact on the survival of CRC. In the paper, we study the effects of having a malignancy preceding CRC diagnosis on its survival outcomes. METHODS: CRC patients diagnosed during 1973-2008 were reviewed using the SEER 18 database. We calculated overall survival and cancer-specific survival of subsequent CRC, and more specifically stage IV CRC, using Kaplan-Meier test and adjusted Cox models. RESULTS: A total 550,325 CRC patients were reviewed, of whom 31,663 had history of a prior malignancy. The most commonly reported sites of a prior malignancy were: prostate, breast, urinary bladder, lung, and endometrium. Patients with history of a prior non-leukemic malignancy or history of a prior leukemia were found to have worse overall survival (HR = 1.165 95%CI = 1.148-1.183, P < 0.001) and (HR = 1.825 95%CI = 1.691-1.970, P < 0.001), respectively. However, CRC patients with history of a prior non-leukemic malignancy showed an improved colorectal cancer-specific survival (HR = .930 95%CI = .909-.952, P < 0.001). Analysis of stage IV CRC patients showed that patients with history of any non-leukemic malignancy did not have a significant change in overall survival. Whereas, patients with a prior leukemia showed a worse overall survival (HR = 1.535, 95%CI = 1.303-1.809, P < 0.001). When analyzed separately, right CRC and left CRC showed similar survival patterns. CONCLUSION: A prior malignancy before CRC -in general- can be associated with worse clinical survival outcomes. These worse outcomes are not observed in stage IV CRC. Considering these results when including/excluding stage IV CRC patients with prior malignancies in clinical trials may play help improve their generalizability.

Temporal trends, ethnic determinants, and short-term and long-term risk of cardiac death in cancer patients: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the risk of cardiac death in patients with prior cancer diagnoses and compared risk by cancer type and ethnicity in a large US population. METHOD: Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, data on patients with a cancer diagnosis between 2000 and 2014 were obtained. We calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of cardiac death after a cancer diagnosis and the excess risk per 10,000 person-years. We stratified the analysis according to the time interval between cancer and cardiac events, cancer site, cancer stage, and race. RESULTS: A total of 4,671,989 patients with a cancer diagnosis were included, of which 163,255 died due to cardiac causes within 10 years of diagnosis. We found a significantly higher rate of cardiac death for cancer patients [SMR=1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.16] compared to the general population. When observed for each cancer site, the highest SMR was after a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (SMR=2.58, 95% CI 2.45-2.72), pancreatic cancer (SMR=2.36, 95% CI 2.25-2.47), and lung cancer (SMR=2.30, 95% CI 2.27-2.34). Patients with metastatic disease had a higher rate of cardiac death (SMR=2.16, 95% CI 2.13-2.19). When stratified by ethnicity, SMR for cardiac death was 1.76, 2.28, 3.68, 2.65, and 1.84 for whites, blacks, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asians/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients are more vulnerable to cardiac death than the general population, especially those with nonwhite ethnicity; liver, lung, and pancreatic cancers; and history of metastasis. Healthcare providers should be aware of this risk and pay particular attention to the highest-risk groups.

Suicidal death within a year of a cancer diagnosis: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The suicide risk after a new cancer diagnosis remains a controversial issue. This study examines the suicide risk within the year after a cancer diagnosis. This is the largest study to assess recent trends in suicide risk after a cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. All patients diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2014 were selected. The event was defined as death due to suicide within the first year after a cancer diagnosis, and patients who experienced the event after their diagnosis were observed. The observed/expected (O/E) ratio was assessed as well as the excess risk per 10,000 person-years to determine the suicide risk change after the diagnosis in comparison with the general population. RESULTS: A total of 4,671,989 patients with cancer were included; 1585 committed suicide within 1 year of their diagnosis. The risk of suicide increased significantly with an O/E ratio of 2.52 and with an excess risk of 2.51 per 10,000 person-years. When the risk of suicide was studied according to the cancer site, the highest increases in the O/E ratio came after diagnoses of pancreatic cancer (8.01) and lung cancer (6.05). The risk of suicide also increased significantly after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer with an O/E ratio of 2.08. However, the risk of suicidal death did not increase significantly after breast and prostate cancer diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of suicide increases significantly in the first year after a diagnosis of cancer in comparison with the general population, and this increase varies with the type and prognosis of cancer. Close observation and referral to mental health services, when indicated, are important for mitigating such risk.

Trends in the incidence and mortality of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder for the last four decades in the USA: a SEER-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) accounts for around 95% of bladder cancers and is the 4th most common cancer among men and the tenth most common in women, in the US. There is a constant need to clarify current TCC incidence and mortality rates among different population groups for better clinical practice guidelines. We aimed to describe the TCC incidence and incidence-based mortality by demographic and tumor-related characteristics over the last 40 years in the US. METHODS: We obtained data from the SEER 18 registries to study TCC cases that were diagnosed between the years 1973 and 2014. We calculated incidence rates and incidence-based mortality rates in different demographic and tumor-related characteristics and expressed rates by 100,000 person-years. We then calculated the annual changes in incidence and incidence-based mortality rates and displayed them as annual percent changes (APCs). RESULTS: There were 182,114 patients with TCC between 1973 and 2014 in the United States. Overall incidence rates of TCC increased 0.16% (95% CI, 0.02-0.30, p = .02) per year over the study period. However, the incidence declined significantly since 2007; (95%CI,-1.89- -0.77, p < .001), except among the elderly and African Americans, which increased significantly over the study period. Overall TCC mortality rates did not change over the study period. However, since 2000 it started to decrease significantly. CONCLUSION: TCC incidence and incidence-based mortality rates had been showing significant increases over the previous decades. However, significant declines in both incidence and incidence-based mortality rates have been observed over the recent years, except in some patients with certain racial groups. Improved understanding of the etiological and ecological factors of TCC could lead to further declines in incidence and incidence-based mortality rates.

Impact of Prior Malignancy on Survival Outcomes of Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: SEER-Based Cohort.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal malignancies and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. Most clinical trials involving pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients exclude subjects with a prior malignancy because of the possible effect of prior malignancies on survival. However, no data in the medical literature support this assumption. In this paper, we aim to study the impact of having a prior malignancy on the survival outcomes of stage IV PAC. METHODS: We used the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database to review patients with stage IV PAC diagnosed between 1973 and 2014. We calculated overall and pancreatic cancer-specific survival of these patients using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test and multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models. RESULTS: We reviewed 66,874 stage IV PAC patients, of which 4942 had a prior malignancy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models showed that a history of prior malignancy did not cause significant difference in overall survival (HR = 0.938, 95%CI = 0.880-1.000, p = .052). However, a prior malignancy was associated with a better pancreatic cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.855, 95% CI = 0.796-0.918, p < .001). CONCLUSION: A prior malignancy before stage IV PAC was not associated with worse survival outcomes. Researchers should take these results into consideration when including/excluding patients to improve the generalizability and accuracy of their results.

Risk and survival of chronic myeloid leukemia after breast cancer: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the risk and survival of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 'SEER' database. Females, diagnosed with BC between 1992 and 2014, were selected and followed for the development of CML after a 6-month latency period from BC diagnosis. We used the Multiple Primary Standardized Incidence Ratios session of the SEER*Stat software (version 8.3.4) to calculate the Observed/Expected (O/E) ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To calculate the overall survival, we performed an unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis using the SPSS software. RESULTS: We included 474,866 females with BC, of which 178 were later diagnosed with CML. We found the risk of CML to increase significantly after BC diagnosis (O/E = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.45) and the risk was specifically higher within the first 5 years of diagnosis (O/E = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.16-1.8). When the risk was stratified by cancer stage, localized BC was associated with a significant increase in CML risk within 5 years of diagnosis (O/E = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.06-1.82), while regional BC was associated with a significant increase in CML risk after more than 5 years of diagnosis (O/E = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.09-2.25). Moreover, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and presence of hormonal receptors were associated with a significant increase in CML risk in BC patients. The median overall survival of CML after BC was 28 months. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients have an increased risk of developing CML and further investigation is required to establish the causes of this finding.

Hyperbaric oxygen and aerobic exercise in the long-term treatment of fibromyalgia: A narrative review.

Chronic pain is one of the most common clinical presentations in the primary care settings. In the US, Fibromyalgia (FM) affects about 1-3% of adults and commonly occurs in adults between the ages of 40-50 years. FM causes widespread muscular pain and tenderness with hyperalgesia and allodynia and may be associated with other somatic complaints. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been utilized and has recently shown promising effects in the management of FM and other chronic pain disorders. In HBOT, the intermittent breathing of 100% oxygen in a pressurized chamber where the pressure is higher than 1 atmosphere absolute (ATA) has been utilized. HBOT exhibits a significant anti-inflammatory effect through reducing production of glial cells and inflammatory mediators which results in pain alleviation in different chronic pain conditions. HBOT can also influence neuroplasticity and affects the mitochondrial mechanisms resulting in functional brain changes. In addition to that, HBOT stimulates nitric oxide (NO) synthesis which helps in alleviating hyperalgesia and NO-dependent release of endogenous opioids which seemed to be the primary HBOT mechanism of antinociception. Moreover, aerobic exercise and meditative movement therapies (MMT) have gained attention for their role in pain alleviation through different anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms. In this review, we aim to elucidate the different mechanisms of HBOT and aerobic exercise in attenuating pain as adjuvant therapy in the multidisciplinary treatment strategy of chronic pain, and more particularly fibromyalgia.

Trends in Renal-Cell Carcinoma Incidence and Mortality in the United States in the Last 2 Decades: A SEER-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the common malignancies in the United States. RCC incidence and mortality have been changing for many reasons. We performed a thorough investigation of incidence and mortality trends of RCC in the United States using the cell Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 13 SEER registries were accessed for RCC cases diagnosed between 1992 and 2015. Incidence and mortality were calculated by demographic and tumor characteristics. We calculated annual percentage changes of these rates. Rates were expressed as 100,000 person-years. RESULTS: A total of 104,584 RCC cases were reviewed, with 47,561 deaths. The overall incidence was 11.281 per 100,000 person-years. Incidence increased by 2.421% per year (95% confidence interval, 2.096, 2.747; P < .001) but later became stable since 2008. However, the incidence of clear-cell subtype continued to increase (1.449%; 95% confidence interval, 0.216, 2.697; P = .024). RCC overall mortality rates have been declining since 2001. However, mortality associated with distant RCC only started to decrease in 2012, with an annual percentage change of 18.270% (95% confidence interval, -28.775, -6.215; P = .006). CONCLUSION: Despite an overall increase in the incidence of RCC, there has been a recent plateau in RCC incidence rates with a significant decrease in mortality.

Outcome disparities in colorectal cancer: a SEER-based comparative analysis of racial subgroups.

PURPOSE: Previous studies of ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) have focused mainly on patients of Caucasian and African-American descent. We aimed to evaluate outcomes for a range of races, representing a broader demographic of the US population. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried to identify patients with CRC diagnosed between 1994 and 2014. We performed unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test and multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models to calculate the overall and CRC-specific survival of patients according to their race. RESULTS: We identified 401,723 patients diagnosed with CRC between 1994 and 2014. Overall survival (OS) and CRC-specific survival were compared across different races stratified by age, sex, marital status, disease stage and grade, and undergoing surgery as a treatment. Overall, Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics had improved CRC-specific survival compared to Whites (HR = 0.873, 95%CI 0.853-0.893, P < .001, and HR = 0.958, 95%CI 0.937-0.979, P < .001, respectively). Blacks had the worst CRC-specific survival outcomes when compared to Whites (HR = 1.215, 95%CI 1.192-1.238, P < .001). Racial disparity persisted when looking at two different time periods (1994-2003 and 2004-2014). CONCLUSIONS: Asians/Pacific Islanders have improved outcomes from CRC compared to other races. Multifactorial, including genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors appear to influence outcomes and need to be addressed separately in order to reduce racial disparities among patients with CRC.

Prior malignancy impact on survival outcomes of glioblastoma multiforme; population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients with a prior malignancy are usually excluded from clinical trials on GBM based on the assumption that this history will affect their survival outcomes. This practice may affect clinical trial accrual and limit the gathering of knowledge essential to the formulation of therapeutic options for this patient population. However, not much is known about the real impact of these prior malignancies on the survival of patients with subsequent GBM. We aimed to investigate the degree of such an impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to analyze data of GBM patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014. We calculated the overall and GBM-specific survival of these patients using the unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test and the multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models. RESULTS: Of 51,158 GBM patients, 3,076 had a prior malignancy. The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test showed worse overall and GBM-specific survivals for patients who had a prior history of cancer. However, after adjusting for age at diagnosis of GBM, sex, race, marital status, and conduction of surgery, multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models showed that having a prior malignancy did not significantly affect neither overall survival (HR = 1.025, 95%CI = .986 - 1.066, p = .213) nor GBM-specific survival (HR = 1.005, 95%CI = .963 - 1.049, p = .810). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the broad practice of excluding patients with a prior history of cancer should be reconsidered as it may adversely affect accrual, trial completion rates, and generalizability of the results.