ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Indonesia is a multicultural Asian country with a high incidence of cleft. This study contextualizes how patients' sociocultural backgrounds hinder cleft management in a diverse nation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study involved 202 families of cleft patients attending six tertiary care hospitals in South Sulawesi between 2021 and 2022. A mixed-methods, descriptive cross-sectional study employed semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Thematic content analysis was done using Murdock's causal attribution of illness. Knowledge of the treatments and surgery expectations used open coding. We held medical team focus group discussions to validate education on treatments. Cleft management education was thematically analyzed based on Indonesia's Minister of Health Decree. RESULTS: Two hundred-two families and ten medical teams participated. Thematic content analysis revealed common beliefs and factors that hinder medical treatments. The participants were 109 Buginese, 57 Makassarese, 16 Durinese, 8 Luwunese, 8 Torajanese, and 4 Mandarese. 22.3 % were unaware of causation, while 29.2 % attributed it to natural causes. About half of the interviewees believed in supernatural attribution. Even though 40 % of participants knew little about the surgery, they agreed that surgery improves appearance and speech. Medical treatments are delayed due to a lack of treatment knowledge, parents' concerns about surgical safety, and beliefs about causes. DISCUSSION: Indigenous societies in South Sulawesi believe in supernatural causes of cleft. Most had incomplete surgical treatment information. An intensive educational health program about causes, treatments, medical specialists, and treatment goals is warranted to enhance patient compliance with medical treatment, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article examines and summarizes the published epidemiological literature on cross-cultural variations. Particular emphasis was put on addressing cross-cultural beliefs on the causes, management, and attitude toward cleft lip and/or cleft palate. A healthcare provider's awareness of these cross-cultural attitudes and beliefs is vital for promoting effective collaboration with patients' families and ensuring a favorable medical outcome. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, their families, their communities, and healthcare providers. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: All relevant and eligible studies were identified using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The cultural belief was categorized and measured using Murdock's Theories of Illness. The study was reported in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated in accordance with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme criteria (CASP). Fourteen articles covering thirteen countries on four continents met the inclusion criteria. In diverse communities, cleft lip and/or cleft palate was attributed to natural (infection, medication, improper diet, smoke, or radiation) or supernatural (God, eclipse, ancestral spirit, and curse) causes. Reported consequences include stigmatization, inappropriate treatments, leaving patients untreated, and infanticide. CONCLUSION: Cultural beliefs are the main cause of misconceptions surrounding a cleft lip and/or cleft palate. There is also a need for public health care providers' intervention to educate society about the natural causes and ease of management, thereby increasing opportunities for patients substantially.
