Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302067, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728318

ABSTRACT

Many lumbar spine diseases are caused by defects or degeneration of lumbar intervertebral discs (IVD) and are usually diagnosed through inspection of the patient's lumbar spine MRI. Efficient and accurate assessments of the lumbar spine are essential but a challenge due to the size of the clinical radiologist workforce not keeping pace with the demand for radiology services. In this paper, we present a methodology to automatically annotate lumbar spine IVDs with their height and degenerative state which is quantified using the Pfirrmann grading system. The method starts with semantic segmentation of a mid-sagittal MRI image into six distinct non-overlapping regions, including the IVD and vertebrae regions. Each IVD region is then located and assigned with its label. Using geometry, a line segment bisecting the IVD is determined and its Euclidean distance is used as the IVD height. We then extract an image feature, called self-similar color correlogram, from the nucleus of the IVD region as a representation of the region's spatial pixel intensity distribution. We then use the IVD height data and machine learning classification process to predict the Pfirrmann grade of the IVD. We considered five different deep learning networks and six different machine learning algorithms in our experiment and found the ResNet-50 model and Ensemble of Decision Trees classifier to be the combination that gives the best results. When tested using a dataset containing 515 MRI studies, we achieved a mean accuracy of 88.1%.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc , Lumbar Vertebrae , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/pathology , Machine Learning , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0241309, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33137112

ABSTRACT

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis causes low back pain through pressures exerted on the spinal nerves. This can be verified by measuring the anteroposterior diameter and foraminal widths of the patient's lumbar spine. Our goal is to develop a novel strategy for assessing the extent of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis by automatically calculating these distances from the patient's lumbar spine MRI. Our method starts with a semantic segmentation of T1- and T2-weighted composite axial MRI images using SegNet that partitions the image into six regions of interest. They consist of three main regions-of-interest, namely the Intervertebral Disc, Posterior Element, and Thecal Sac, and three auxiliary regions-of-interest that includes the Area between Anterior and Posterior elements. A novel contour evolution algorithm is then applied to improve the accuracy of the segmentation results along important region boundaries. Nine anatomical landmarks on the image are located by delineating the region boundaries found in the segmented image before the anteroposterior diameter and foraminal widths can be measured. The performance of the proposed algorithm was evaluated through a set of experiments on the Lumbar Spine MRI dataset containing MRI studies of 515 patients. These experiments compare the performance of our contour evolution algorithm with the Geodesic Active Contour and Chan-Vese methods over 22 different setups. We found that our method works best when our contour evolution algorithm is applied to improve the accuracy of both the label images used to train the SegNet model and the automatically segmented image. The average error of the calculated right and left foraminal distances relative to their expert-measured distances are 0.28 mm (p = 0.92) and 0.29 mm (p = 0.97), respectively. The average error of the calculated anteroposterior diameter relative to their expert-measured diameter is 0.90 mm (p = 0.92). The method also achieves 96.7% agreement with an expert opinion on determining the severity of the Intervertebral Disc herniations.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnostic imaging , Low Back Pain/diagnostic imaging , Lumbosacral Region/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/physiopathology , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/physiopathology , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Lumbosacral Region/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Spinal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Canal/physiopathology , Spinal Stenosis/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...