Localization value of ictal turning prone.

PURPOSE: Ictal semiology complements ictal EEG in identifying the likely epileptogenic zone. Ictal turning prone (ITP) with body turning of 90 ° or more can be seen with frontal lobe epilepsies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the localizing value of ITP in a general population of patients undergoing long term video-EEG monitoring. METHODS: We reviewed our epilepsy monitoring unit database for adult patients with recorded habitual seizures with ITP. All 16 patients identified had continuous video-EEG monitoring using standard scalp electrodes; eight patients also had intracranial EEG monitoring. We only included focal seizures without evolution to bilateral tonic-clonic activity. RESULTS: We identified 16 patients with ITP, mean age of 32.5 years (range 18-50). ITP was consistently seen in at least one focal impaired awareness seizure of all patients. Ictal onset zone on scalp EEG was left temporal in five, right temporal in three, left frontal convexity in two, right frontal convexity in two, probable right medial frontal in three and probable left medial frontal in one patient. Direction of ITP was uni-directional in 12 patients while 4 patients had ITP in opposite direction in different seizures. Nine patients underwent epilepsy surgery; five patients had Engel class I outcome and four patients had Engel class III outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Ictal turning prone does not have a consistent single localizing or lateralizing value and can be seen with various epileptogenic zones including medial frontal, lateral frontal or temporal. ITP direction can vary even with a single epileptogenic zone.

Aphasic or amnesic status epilepticus detected on PET but not EEG.

PURPOSE: To describe five patients with ictal aphasia and one patient with ictal amnesia, who had focal positron emission tomography (PET) hypermetabolism but no clear ictal activity on electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS: (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scans with concomitant EEG were obtained in five patients with suspected ictal aphasia or ictal amnesia without ictal activity on EEG. We reviewed medical history, EEG, imaging data, and treatment outcome. RESULTS: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no structural abnormalities in any of the patients. EEG showed left temporal irregular delta activity in three patients, with aphasia and nonspecific abnormalities in two other patients, all without clear ictal pattern. All patients demonstrated focal hypermetabolism on PET scan. The hypermetabolism was in the left frontotemporal region in patients with ictal aphasia and in the bilateral hippocampal region in the patient with amnesia. Three patients who received intravenous benzodiazepines during their episodes had transient clinical improvement. With antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment, symptoms gradually resolved in all patients. Concomitant resolution of PET hypermetabolism was documented in three patients who had follow up scans. One patient with ictal aphasia later developed recurrent episodes, each with recurrent PET hypermetabolism. This patient and one other patient required immune-modulating therapy in addition to AEDs. DISCUSSION: FDG-PET imaging should be considered as a diagnostic tool in patients with suspected ictal aphasia or amnesia, who fail to show clear evidence of ictal activity on EEG.

Seizure freedom off antiepileptic drugs after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.

Data are limited on seizure recurrence after antiepileptic drug (AED) discontinuation in operated seizure-free patients. We reviewed seizure outcome in patients who came off AEDs after being seizure-free for 2 years following temporal lobe surgery in our center. Thirty-nine (68%) of 57 patients who discontinued AED therapy remained seizure-free. They had a younger age at surgery than the group with seizure recurrence (p=0.01). Earlier surgery may be a favorable predictor for seizure freedom after AED discontinuation.