ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has become the standard treatment for early oesophageal neoplasia. The mucosal defect caused by EMR usually takes several weeks to heal. Despite guidelines on high-risk endoscopic procedures in patients on anticoagulation, evidence is lacking whether EMR is safe in such patients. We investigated the immediate and delayed bleeding risk in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic oesophageal EMR comparing patients requiring warfarin anticoagulation with a control group. METHODS: Warfarin was stopped 5 days before the planned EMR and restarted on the evening following the procedure. Patients with high-risk conditions, such as recent pulmonary thromboemboli, received bridging with low molecular weight heparin. All EMRs were performed when the INR was <1.5. Bleeding events on the day of the EMR and within 3 months post-procedure were documented. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen consecutive patients with early oesophageal neoplasia were included. Sixty-eight EMRs were performed in 15 patients requiring anticoagulation. One patient on warfarin was readmitted 10 days after EMR with haematemesis and melaena. Out of 400 EMRs in 102 controls, 26 immediate bleeding events occurred requiring endoscopic intervention. One delayed bleeding event (melaena) occurred in the control group. The number of bleeding events did not differ between groups [p = 0.99; odds ratio 1.01 (0.30-3.44)], neither for acute (p = 0.76) nor delayed bleeding (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: EMR of early oesophageal neoplasia can be safely performed in patients requiring anticoagulation when warfarin is discontinued 5 days before the endoscopic intervention and reinstituted on the evening of the procedure day.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/surgery , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Proximal esophageal heterotopic gastric mucosa or so-called inlet patch in the cervical oesophagus is easily missed on endoscopic examination because of its localisation, usually just below the upper oesophageal sphincter. We evaluated the clinical use of narrow band imaging for detection of inlet patches. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled observational study, 1407 subsequent patients underwent oesophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without narrow band imaging on withdrawal of the endoscope in the cervical oesophagus. RESULTS: One endoscopist who was not aware of the prospective observation documented 6 (1.17%) cases of inlet patches in 515 oesophagogastroduodenoscopies compared to 4 cases out of 382 (1.05%) performed by the endoscopist who paid special attention to the presence of inlet patches but did not routinely apply narrow band imaging (OR 0.89, CI 95% 0.25-3.20, p=0.85). In comparison, 17 cases of inlet patches out of 510 (3.33%) were detected by the endoscopist who routinely applied narrow band imaging. The detection rate of proximal oesophageal heterotopic gastric mucosa using narrow band imaging was significantly higher compared to white light endoscopy only (OR 3.06, CI 95% 1.39-6.73, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of the endoscope from the cervical oesophagus using narrow band imaging increased the detection of inlet patches about three-fold compared to standard white light endoscopy.
