Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Angle Orthod ; 89(4): 624-629, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30840498

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of individual's taste sensitivity using 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) in the development of white spot lesions (WSLs) in adolescent orthodontic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 44 healthy adolescents, aged 12 to 16 years old, who were in fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment for at least 6 months, consented to participate in this cross-sectional study. Data regarding participants' demographic information, oral hygiene practices, and dietary habits were obtained by a questionnaire. An oral clinical examination was performed to determine the oral hygiene status, the presence of WSLs and dental caries experience. The taste phenotype of the participants was evaluated through PROP test and they were accordingly divided into PROP nontasters and PROP tasters. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 24 subjects in the WSL group and 20 subjects in the WSL-free group. The WSL group demonstrated higher mean plaque score (48.2), mean decayed, missing, and filled surfaces (2.38), and mean decayed, missing, and filled teeth (1.96) scores compared to the WSL-free group (38.7, 0.85, and 0.55, respectively), but no significant differences were found. Most subjects in the WSL group were PROP nontasters (66.6%) whereas most subjects in the WSL-free group were PROP tasters (75%); a significant difference was observed between the groups (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of white spot lesions was significantly higher in adolescent orthodontic patients who were PROP nontasters compared to PROP tasters. A PROP taste perception could be a potential risk factor for the formation of WSLs during fixed orthodontic treatment that warrants further attention.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Taste Perception , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Oral Hygiene , Taste
2.
J Clin Dent ; 19(2): 43-7, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18763685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare the topical anesthetic effect of two different preparations of lidocaine/prilocaine, cream versus thermosetting gel, on the reduction of pain from needle stick in the palate. The study also compared the subjects' preferences with regard to the substances. METHODS: Two preparations of 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine topical anesthetic agents were applied on the palatal mucosa in the canine region bilaterally and blindly to forty subjects. In the same visit, the cream (EMLA) was applied on one side and the thermosetting gel (Oraqix) on the other side, simultaneously. After that, a needle stick was given on each side using a 27-gauge needle inserted to bone contact through the palatal mucosa every second minute during a ten-minute period. Immediately after the needle stick, the subjects started recording their findings using a verbal scale, a visual analogue scale, and a questionnaire form. Significant differences were set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Both substances reduced or eliminated pain from needle stick in the palate. Significant differences in pain reduction were observed between the two substances. EMLA reduced pain significantly better than Oraqix. With regard to comfort, taste, anesthetic effect, personal preference, and recommendation, the majority of the subjects favored the EMLA cream to the thermosetting gel. No adverse effects were reported by the subjects. CONCLUSION: Although both topical anesthetic agents are similar in content, the cream seemed to be preferred by the patients and reduced pain from needle stick in the palate significantly better than the thermosetting gel.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Facial Pain/prevention & control , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Needles/adverse effects , Prilocaine/administration & dosage , Adult , Facial Pain/etiology , Female , Gels , Humans , Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination , Male , Middle Aged , Ointments , Pain Measurement , Palate, Hard , Patient Satisfaction , Single-Blind Method
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17331753

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the topical anesthetic effect of 20% benzocaine gel with 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine (L/P) cream and gel on the pain experienced during palatal anesthetic infiltration. STUDY DESIGN: Two groups were studied, each containing 20 subjects. Two types of L/P mixtures were tested, an anesthetic cream (EMLA) and a thermosetting gel (Oraqix), and benzocaine was used as control. The topical agents were applied on the palatal mucosa at the canine region. A needle prick was given on each side every 2 minutes during a period of 10 minutes. The subjects recorded their findings using verbal and VAS scales. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly less (P < .05) with EMLA and Oraqix than with benzocaine. CONCLUSION: Topical application of EMLA and Oraqix before palatal anesthetic infiltration is associated with less pain than with benzocaine gel.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Benzocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Pain/prevention & control , Prilocaine/administration & dosage , Adult , Gels , Humans , Injections/adverse effects , Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination , Mouth Mucosa , Needles/adverse effects , Ointments , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Palate, Hard , Single-Blind Method
4.
Med Princ Pract ; 15(6): 417-22, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17047347

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate reasons for tooth extraction and its association with age and gender in Kuwait. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A record of all tooth extractions performed in 21 general dental practice centers during a 1-month period was logged on specially designed study forms. The patient's age and gender, number of teeth extracted, and the reason(s) for the extraction were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2,783 teeth were extracted in 1,604 patients (1.73 +/- 0.07 teeth per patient). Caries and periodontal disease were responsible for 43.7 and 37.4% of extractions, respectively. Caries was the principal cause for extraction in patients < or =40 years old (60.7%), while periodontal disease was the main cause of extractions in patients > or =40 years of age (63.0%). Extractions for caries and orthodontic reasons were more common in females, while extractions for periodontal disease were more prevalent in males. Molars and maxillary premolars were more commonly extracted due to caries, while mandibular premolars, and maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (canines and incisors) were more commonly extracted due to periodontal disease. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that caries is the principal cause for extractions in younger patients, while periodontal disease accounts for the majority of tooth extractions in patients older than 40 years. Furthermore, this study indicates that more teeth per patient are lost to periodontal disease than for any other reason.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/complications , Periodontal Diseases/complications , Tooth Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Kuwait/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...