Vaginal length and sexual function after vertical versus horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial.

This randomised clinical trial aimed to evaluate the vaginal length and female sexual function after vertical and horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy. The patients were allocated into two groups, vertical closure and horizontal closure groups. The vaginal length was determined using transperineal ultrasound, once preoperative and again 3 months after the operation. Female sexual function was determined using an Arabic validated female sexual function index questionnaire. Both techniques resulted in a significant shortening of the vaginal length (p-value .001). There was a significant improvement in sexual function in the vertical closure group rather than the horizontal closure one. We concluded that there was no significant difference in the vaginal length after vertical or horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff. However, female sexual function improved significantly in the vertical closure group.Trial registration number: PACTR201909573801168.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Conflicting results exist regarding the effect of different techniques of vaginal length closure on vaginal length and sexual function after hysterectomy.What do the results of this study add? There was no significant difference in the vaginal length after vertical or horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff. However, female sexual function improved significantly in the vertical closure group. This study is considered to be the first one to evaluate the correlation between the vaginal length and the female sexual function.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The correlation between vaginal length and female sexual function needs to be evaluated in a multicenter study, recruiting larger number of sexually active women.

Prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions using striae gravidarum and scar characteristics in women undergoing repeated cesarean sections.

BACKGROUND: The current fact of increasing rates of cesarean deliveries is a catastrophe. Recurrent cesareans result in intraperitoneal adhesions that would lead to maternal morbidity during delivery. Great efforts are directed towards the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions to provide the best care for laboring women. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of abdominal striae and cesarean scar characters in the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions. METHODS: This was a case- control study conducted in the emergency ward of the obstetrics and gynecology department of a tertiary hospital from June to December 2019. The study was carried on patients admitted to the ward fulfilling particular inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study included two groups, group one was assessed for the presence of striae, and the degree of intraperitoneal adhesions was evaluated during the current cesarean section. Group two included patients without evidence of abdominal striae. They were evaluated for the severity of adhesions also after evaluation of the previous scar. Evaluation of the striae was done using Davey's scoring system. The scar was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale. The modified Nair's scoring system was used to evaluate intraperitoneal adhesions. RESULTS: The study group included 203 women, while the control group included 205 women. There were significant differences in the demographic characters of the recruited patients (p-value 0.001 for almost all variables). The mean Davey score in those with mild, moderate, and severe striae was 1.82 ± 0.39, 3.57 ± 0.5, and 6.73 ± 0.94, respectively (p-value < 0.001). Higher scores for the parameters of the Vancouver scale were present in patients with severe striae (1.69 ± 1.01, 1.73 ± 0.57, 2.67 ± 1.23, and 1.35 ± 1.06 for scar vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height respectively with a p-value of < 0.001 each). Thick intraperitoneal adhesions were noted significantly in women with severe striae [21 (43.75%), p-value < 0.001)]. The Davey's and Vancouver scores showed highly significant predictive performance in the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Abdominal striae and cesarean scar were significant predictors for intraperitoneal adhesions.