Assessing peculiarity of molar root trunk dimensions in a sample of Saudi population - A radiographic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dimensions of root trunk lengths (RTL) in maxillary and mandibular molars and evaluate their correlation with the mesio-distal (MD) width of the tooth at the level of cemento enamel junction and Inter-Radicular Angle (IRA) at the point of roots separation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographic measurements of a total of 955 molars from 120 study subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The sampling frame consisted of radiographs from the outpatient dental clinic of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The linear measurements, including the width, length and depth of the root trunks under investigation were made using flexible translucent plastic grid while; the angles were measured by rotary German caliper protractor. RESULT: The mean RTL dimension for molars were 4.31 mm (3-8 mm). The mean MD width of the molars was 10.02 mm and the mean measured IRA was 34.12°. The longest RT was observed in maxillary 1st molar (4.40 mm) while the shortest radiographic RT length was recorded for the mandibular 2nd molars (4.13 mm). Statictically insignificant correlation (p = 0.090) was observed between RTL with the MD width of the tooth, whereas appreciable significance resulted between RTL and IRA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Knowledge about the molar teeth RT length of the study population will aid the dental clinician in better decision making during management of periodontal disease conditions.

Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Immunologic Inflammatory Parameters around Crestally and Subcrestally Placed Dental Implants: 5-Year Retrospective Results.

PURPOSE: To compare changes in clinical (bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing pocket depth [PPD]), radiographic (crestal bone loss [CBL]), and immunologic inflammatory (interleukin-1beta [IL-1ß] and matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9]) parameters around crestally and subcrestally placed dental implants 5 years after implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 27): patients with single implants placed approximately 2 mm below the alveolar crest; group 2 (n = 25): patients with single implants placed at bone level. In both groups, peri-implant BOP, PPD, and CBL were measured, and levels of IL-1ß and MMP-9 were determined in duplicates using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Full-mouth debridement was performed biannually in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (significance set at p < 0.05). RESULTS: All measurements in groups 1 and 2 were performed 5.3 ± 0.2 and 5.2 ± 0.1 years after implant placement, respectively. The mean CBL was 1.2 ± 0.2 mm and 1.4 ± 0.2 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no significant difference in mean BOP, PPD, CBL and in levels of IL-1ß, and MMP-9 among implants in both groups. CONCLUSION: Clinical, radiographic, and immunologic inflammatory parameters are comparable around crestally and subcrestally placed single dental implants up to 5 years after placement. The depth of implant placement appears to have no effect on clinical status and performance of single dental implants.

Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Immunologic Inflammatory Parameters Around Dental Implants with Cement-Retained and Screw-Retained Restorations: A 5-Year Prospective Cohort Study in Men.

PURPOSE: To compare bleeding on probing (BoP), probing depth (PD; ≥ 4 mm), radiographic (peri-implant crestal bone loss [CBL]), and immunologic inflammatory (interleukin-1beta [IL-1ß] and matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9]) parameters around dental implants with cement-retained (CR) and screw-retained (SR) implant-supported crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the mode of retention of the restoration, 51 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of 26 single implants restored with CR crowns, and Group 2, consisting of 25 single implants restored with SR crowns. Peri-implant BoP, PD, and CBL were scored, and levels of IL-1ß and MMP-9 in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in both groups were measured in duplicate using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Full-mouth mechanical debridement was performed biannually in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test with the significance level set at P < .05. RESULTS: The mean CBL among implants in groups 1 and 2 was 1.7 ± 0.5 mm and 1.7 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mean BoP, PD, and CBL among implants in both groups (P > .05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in the PICF levels of IL-1ß (7.3 ± 0.5 and 7.2 ± 0.5, respectively) and MMP-9 (165 ± 9.4 and 182 ± 10.6, respectively) (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The mode of retention of implant-supported crowns does not appear to affect their clinical correlations with BoP, PD, CBL, and levels of IL-1ß and MMP-9 in the PICF when zinc oxide eugenol cement is used.