ABSTRACT
Introducción: el cierre percutáneo es una herramienta esencial en el tratamiento endovascular actual. Los procedimientos de patología aórtica precisan abordajes arteriales de gran calibre a nivel inguinal, lo que conlleva mayor posibilidad de complicaciones en el cierre. Es por esto que actualmente continúan conviviendo la técnica quirúrgica abierta y el abordaje percutáneo, siendo también así en el territorio nacional, con resultados a día de hoy no cuantificados. La literatura actual aporta buenos resultados para la técnica de presutura en patología aórtica, sin embargo aún existen dudas respecto a determinados factores de riesgo como la obesidad, calcificación severa o arterias de pequeño calibre. Tampoco existen suficientes datos que estudien cómo afecta este procedimiento a la calidad de vida, lo cual es un punto esencial, especialmente en pacientes mayores. Dado que un alto porcentaje de los pacientes que se someten a estas intervenciones son ancianos con patologías concomitantes (los llamados pacientes frágiles), minimizar la agresión quirúrgica y mejorar su calidad de vida inmediata post-procedimiento puede ser determinante. Objetivos: primarios: estimar la tasa de éxito técnico del procedimiento de cierre percutáneo en intervenciones aórticas, estimación del impacto en la calidad de vida así como encontrar posibles diferencias en la morbimortalidad a 30 días en relación a la puntuación de cada paciente en la escala de fragilidad modificada; secundarios: evaluar el tiempo de presutura, tiempo de hemostasia, complicaciones derivadas del cierre, estancia hospitalaria y el dolor posoperatorio. Material y métodos: el Registro SPAIN es un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo de pacientes sometidos a procedimientos percutáneos sobre la aorta y sus ramas con dispositivos ≥ 10 French (F), en el que serán recogidas variables relacionadas con el cierre de sus accesos inguinales. El periodo de seguimiento será de 30 días...(AU)
Introduction: percutaneous closure is an essential tool in current endovascular treatment. Aortic pathology procedures require large-caliber arterial approaches, leading to a greater possibility of closure complications. For this reason, nowadays, both open surgical and the preclose technique coexist in almost every center worldwide, as it does in Spain with no contrasted results. The current literature provides good results for the pre-closing technique in aortic pathology, however there are still doubts regarding certain risk factors such as obesity, severe calcification or small-caliber arteries. There is not enough data to study how this procedure affects quality of life, an essential point, especially in older patients. Minimizing surgical aggression and improving their immediate post-procedure quality of life can be decisive because most of the patients are elderly with concomitant pathologies (fragile patients). Objetives: primary objectives: to estimate the technical success rate of the percutaneous closure procedure in aortic interventions, estimate the impact on quality of life and find possible differences in morbidity and mortality at 30 days in relation to the score of each patient on the frailty scale; secondary objectives: To evaluate the pre-suture time, hemostasis time, complications derived from closure, hospital stay and post-operative pain. Material and methods: the SPAIN Registry is a prospective multicenter study of patients undergoing percutaneous procedures on the aorta and its branches with ≥ 10 French (F) devices. Variables related to the closure of their inguinal access will be collected. The follow-up period will be 30 days. The duration of the recruitment period will be one year initially. Participants must certify that they have performed the closure of at least 10 large caliber percutaneous approaches (≥ 10 F) in national units of the specialties of Angiology and Vascular Surgery and Cardiology...(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Endovascular Procedures , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aorta/surgery , Aortic Diseases , Prospective Studies , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Type 2 endoleaks (T2Es) are the main cause of reintervention after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The objective of this study is to quantify success rates of T2E treatment. METHODS: This study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database containing data on all consecutive patients treated for a T2E between 2003 and 2017 in a single center. Technical success was defined as absence of endoleak in the final angiographic control after treatment. Clinical success was defined as absence of sac growth over 5 mm in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed a year thereafter. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. RESULTS: A total of 528 elective EVARs were performed in the period. Thirty-six of these (6.8%) developed a T2E requiring reintervention, a median of 37.9 months after EVAR. Twenty-five percent of the treatments were performed more than 5 years after intervention. Twenty-eight of the 36 treatments were performed via transarterial embolization. For this technique, technical success was 71.4% and clinical success was 62.5%. A subsequent reintervention was required in 35.7% of patients. In this cohort, the rate of aneurysm rupture was 10.7% (n = 3/28), open surgical conversion was needed in 2 of 28 cases (7.1%), and rate of aneurysm-related death was 14.3% (n = 4/28) over follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients are at risk of adverse outcomes after T2E treatment. Strict imaging follow-up is still needed in this population.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endoleak/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Databases, Factual , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Revascularization of femoral arteries from descending thoracic or supraceliac aorta is an uncommon procedure, in part because of the popularization of the technically easier extra-anatomic bypasses. However, using those aortic levels as the source of the bypass inflow is a useful alternative in selected patients with aortoiliac disease, with excellent results. We report long-term results in 4 patients with revascularization from thoracic aorta and another 2 cases from aorta at supraceliac level. This technique should be considered as a good alternative in patients with adverse abdominal conditions or with a severely diseased infrarenal aorta due to heavy calcification.
