ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease and low bone mineral density are major health problems in the elderly. These two conditions are considered independent of each other and age-related diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between low bone mineral density (BMD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidents, and the effect of vitamin D and calcium supplement on the incidence of CVD in patients with low BMD. METHODS: A total of 1047 patients (597 females/450 males) with the age of 65 years and more were diagnosed with osteopenia for 13 years or more. The study also included 220 patients (107 females/113 males) with osteopenia who already took calcium and vitamin D continually since their diagnosis. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The incidence of any cardiovascular diseases in the study patients and the presence of corresponding risk factors were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In both elderly Arab females and males, there was an association between total hip and femoral neck BMD and the possibility to have CVD. On the other hand, the results showed that patients who use calcium and vitamin D supplements showed a significant reduction in the incidence of CVD comparing to the non-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Low total hip and femoral neck BMD were associated with a higher chance to have CVD incidents in both elderly Arab males and females; moreover, calcium and vitamin D supplements have a possible protective role in reducing cardiovascular disease in elderly patients with osteopenia.
ABSTRACT
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most prevalent cancer in males, with an incidence rate (IR) of 13.1%, and the second most prevalent cancer in females, with an IR of 8.4%, coming after breast cancer in Jordan. The present study was motivated by conflicting clinical data regarding the prognostic impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our study aimed to investigate if KRAS mutation conferred a negative prognostic value in Jordanian patients with mCRC. Materials and methods The current study is a retrospective study that collected data from a cohort of 135 mCRC patients diagnosed between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2022 at our Oncology Department at the Jordanian Military Cancer Center (MCAC) using our patients' electronic medical records. The last follow-up date was 1 September 2022. From the cohort, we obtained data regarding age, sex, date of diagnosis, metastatic spread, KRAS status, either mutated KRAS or wild-type KRAS, and location of the primary tumor. All patients underwent tumor tissue biopsies to determine KRAS mutational status based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction and reverse hybridization from an accredited diagnostic laboratory at Jordan University Hospital. Statistical analysis was carried out to address the associations between KRAS mutation and the patients-tumor characteristics and their prognosis on survival. Results KRAS mutation was found in 40.3% of the participants in the study, and 56.7% had the wild type. There was a predilection of KRAS mutation, with 67% on the right side versus 33% on the left side (p = 0.018). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed worse survival outcomes in KRAS mutant patients (p = 0.002). The median overall survival in the KRAS mutant patients was 17 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.762-19.273) compared to 21 months (95% CI: 20.507-27.648) in patients with wild-type KRAS. Additionally, the Cox regression model identified that KRAS mutation carries a poorer prognosis on survival outcome hazard ratio (HR: 2.045, 95% CI: 1.291-3.237, p = 0.002). The test also showed statistical significance in the metastatic site (lung only). But this time, it was associated with a better survival outcome (HR: 0.383, 95% CI: 0.186-0.788, p = 0.009). Conclusion The present study shows that the presence of KRAS mutation has been found to negatively impact the prognosis and survival outcome of Jordanian patients with mCRC.
ABSTRACT
The Corpus Callosum (CC) is an important structure that includes the majority of fibers connecting the two brain hemispheres. Several neurodegenerative diseases may alter CC size and morphology leading to its atrophy and malfunction which may play a role in the pathological manifestations found in these diseases. The purpose of the current study is to determine any possible changes in CC size in patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease. The Study also investigated the effect of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) on the size of CC and its association with improvement in the Alzheimer disease severity scores. Midsagittal size of CC were recorded prospectively from 439 routine T1-weighted MRI brain images in normal individuals. The internal skull surface was measured to calculate CC/ internal skull surface ratio. Two groups of patients were studied: 300 (150 male / 150 female) were healthy subjects and 130 (55 males / 75 females) had Alzheimer disease. Out of the 130 Alzheimer disease pateints, 70 patients were treated with Donepezil or Rivastigmine or both. The size of the CC was measured based on T1-weighted MRI images after the treatment to investigate any possible improvement in CC size. The mean surface area of CC in controls was 6.53±1.105 cm2. There was no significant difference between males and females (P < 0.627), and CC/ internal skull surface ratio was 4.41±0.77%. Patients with mild or severe Alzheimer disease showed a significant reduction in CC size compared to healthy controls. Treating mild Alzheimer patients with either Donepezil or Rivastigmine exerts a comparable therapeutic effect in improving the CC size. There was more improvement in the size of CC in patients with severe Alzheimer disease by using combined therapy of Donepezil and Rivastigmine than using single a medication. we measured the mean size of the various portions of the corpus callosum in normal individuals and Alzheimer patients before and after taking Donepezil and Rivastigmine. Alzheimer patients have pronounced reduction in CC which is corrected after taking Donepezil and Rivastigmine leading to remarkable improvement in Alzheimer disease severity scores.
