The Effect of Written Information on Recall of Surgical Risks of Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate parents' understanding of the risks of primary cleft palate surgery after counseling with and without the use of a written informational aid. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind trial. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of children undergoing primary cleft palate surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Parents were randomized to receive a standard informed consent discussion with or without provision of a written informational aid in the form of a pamphlet. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Parents' recall of 9 specific surgical risks 3 weeks after informed consent discussion. RESULTS: Forty parents enrolled in and completed the study (20 participants each in the control and intervention groups). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of baseline demographics. The mean number of risks recalled were 3.7 (1.6) for the control group and 4.2 (1.9) for the intervention group (P = .37). The most commonly recalled risks were fistula formation and bleeding, while the least frequent were facial growth restriction and need for further surgery. No differences in risk recall were observed based on participant's gender, level of education, or income. CONCLUSION: Parents of children undergoing primary cleft palate surgery recall less than 50% of counseled risks. The use of a written aid in the form of a pamphlet did not significantly improve recall in this sample. These results demonstrate that surgeons should implement additional measures to improve comprehension of surgical risks.

What Are Your Patients Reading Online About Soft-tissue Fillers? An Analysis of Internet Information.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue fillers are increasingly being used for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. They generally offer minimal downtime and reliable results. However, significant complications are reported and patients need to be aware of these as part of informed consent. The Internet serves as a vital resource to inform patients of the risks and benefits of this procedure. METHODS: Three independent reviewers performed a structured analysis of 65 Websites providing information on soft-tissue fillers. Validated instruments were used to analyze each site across multiple domains, including readability, accessibility, reliability, usability, quality, and accuracy. Associations between the endpoints and Website characteristics were assessed using linear regression and proportional odds modeling. RESULTS: The majority of Websites were physician private practice sites (36.9%) and authored by board-certified plastic surgeons or dermatologists (35.4%) or nonphysicians (27.7%). Sites had a mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 11.9 ± 2.6, which is well above the recommended average of 6 to 7 grade level. Physician private practice sites had the lowest scores across all domains with a notable lack of information on complications. Conversely, Websites of professional societies focused in plastic surgery and dermatology, as well as academic centers scored highest overall. CONCLUSIONS: As the use of soft-tissue fillers is rising, patients should be guided toward appropriate sources of information such as Websites sponsored by professional societies. Medical professionals should be aware that patients may be accessing poor information online and strive to improve the overall quality of information available on soft-tissue fillers.