The use of and out-of-pocket spending on complementary and alternative medicine in Qassim province, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current picture of the Saudis' use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has not yet been developed. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using the international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q) in Saudi Arabia to evaluate the use of and out-of-pocket spending on CAM. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: It was a cross-sectional study, conducted in 2011, in primary health care centers in Qassim. METHODS: In a multistage sampling technique, 12 primary health care centers were selected randomly in the Al-Qassim province in Saudi Arabia. From each center, 100 attendants were interviewed for a total of 1160 completed questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 74% of subjects had visited CAM providers in 12 months before the survey. This percentage decreased to 47.6% when spiritual healers were excluded. The specific CAM providers who were visited were spiritual healers (26.7%), herbalists (23.2%), providers of honeybee products (14.9%), and hijama (wet cupping; 13%). Chronic illnesses were the main reason for the visits. A total of 50% of subjects were satisfied with their visit. Physicians were the providers of CAM for 11.3% of the participants. More than 75% of the subjects used herbs in the previous 12 months for medical and health reasons, while only 25% used vitamins or minerals. Self-help was used in 26% of the participants. Relaxation (10.3%) was the most common self-CAM practice followed by meditation (6.7%). The subjects spent 350000 (US$) on CAM visits and 300000 (US$) purchasing CAM products. CONCLUSIONS: I-CAM-Q can be used in different populations and cultures in the East including Saudi Arabia after customization to overcome its limitations, as the questionnaire was developed in Western societies.

Epidemiology of medico-legal litigations and related medical errors in Central and Northern Saudi Arabia. A retrospective prevalence study.

OBJECTIVE: To study medico-legal litigations and related medical errors in Central (Al-Qassim), and Northern (Hael) districts in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and to identify types and causes of errors to reduce medical errors and patient harm. METHODS: This retrospective prevalence study was carried out between May 2010 and December 2011 to analyze medico-legal litigations in Al-Qassim and Hael districts that were investigated by the Al-Qassim Medico-Legal Committee, Al-Qassim, KSA. Final verdicts issued between 1992 and 2009 included 293 cases. RESULTS: The patient`s mean age was 29.5 years. Fifty-seven percent of the patients were females, and 92% were Saudis. The Obstetric and Gynecology department was involved in 29.7% of litigations followed by General Surgery, and Pediatrics (11.3% each). Of the 635 defendants, 90% were physicians, and 7.6% were nurses. Investigations showed no error in 47.1% of cases, error but no harm in 11.9%, and error resulted in harm in 39.6%. Errors were negligence (45.8%), wrong diagnosis (14.2%), surgical error (10.3%), and administrative error (5.2%). The average total duration of litigations was 13.9 months. Type of harm was the most significant predictor to determine a guilty decision (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Obstetric practice in Al-Qassim and Hael districts and provider negligence contribute to a large portion of medico-legal litigations, and therefore this has to be further studied to recognize the specific causes and possible interventions. A systematic review of the medico-legal committee is needed to shorten the long duration of litigation.