Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(48): e36491, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050277

ABSTRACT

Biliary pancreatitis is a common complication of gallstones. Although most patients experience mild disease, around 20% may develop severe pancreatitis with an increased risk of serious complications during recurrent attacks. The objective of our study is to compare the surgical outcomes and length of stay for early versus delayed cholecystectomy, performed within the same admission, for mild pancreatitis in a Saudi tertiary center with an established Acute Care Surgey Unit. This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the index admission for biliary pancreatitis between January 2017 and January 2020. Surgical outcomes and hospital length of stay were collected and analyzed to assess overall outcomes for early and delayed cholecystectomy groups. The early group was defined as surgery performed within 72 hours of presentation. Eighty-six patients were included and allocated to the early and delayed cholecystectomy groups. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early cholecystectomy group (4 days, IQR 3-5) compared to the delayed group (7 days, IQR 6-9) (P < .001). There was no significant difference in operative time and postoperative complications. Early cholecystectomy for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe and feasible and may result in a shorter hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Gallstones , Pancreatitis , Humans , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Gallstones/complications , Gallstones/surgery , Pancreatitis/surgery , Pancreatitis/complications , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Acute Disease
2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 23(1): 262, 2023 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37525096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients with colon cancer present with a colonic obstruction. The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in potential curative patients with left-sided colonic cancer obstruction remains debatable. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological outcomes of using a SEMS as a BTS. METHODS: All patients with left-sided malignant colon obstruction who underwent curative surgery with no metastasis upon presentation between March 2009 and May 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included, 28 patients underwent upfront surgery, and 17 patients had a stent as a bridge to surgery. T4 stage was statistically significantly higher in patients who had a SEMS as a BTS (35.3% vs. 10.7%) (p-value 0.043). The mean duration in days of the SEMS to surgery was 13.76 (SD 10.08). TNM stage 3 was a prognostic factor toward distant metastasis (HR 5.05). When comparing patients who had upfront surgery to those who had a SEMS as a BTS, higher 5-year disease-free survival (75% vs. 72%) and 5-year overall survival (89% vs. 82%) were seen in patients who had upfront surgery. However, both were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: Using self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery yields comparable 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates to upfront emergency surgery. The decision to use SEMS versus opting for emergency surgery should be made after careful patient selection and with the assistance of experienced endoscopists. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Intestinal Obstruction , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Stents , Treatment Outcome , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery
3.
Saudi J Gastroenterol ; 29(5): 316-322, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37006086

ABSTRACT

Background: In this study, we aimed to identify the oncological outcomes in colon cancer patients who underwent elective versus emergency curative resection. Methods: All patients who underwent curative resection for colon cancer between July 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presentation into elective and emergency groups. Results: A total of 215 patients with colon cancer were admitted and underwent curative surgical resection. Of those, 145 patients (67.4%) were elective cases, and 70 (32.5%) were emergency cases. Family history of malignancy was positive in 44 patients (20.5%) and significantly more common in the emergency group (P = 0.016). The emergency group had higher T and TNM stages (P = 0.001). The 3-year survival rate was 60.9% and significantly less in the emergency group (P = 0.026). The mean duration from surgery to recurrence, 3-year disease-free survival, and overall survival were 1.19, 2.81, and 3.11, respectively. Conclusion: Elective group was associated with better 3-year survival, longer overall, and 3-year disease-free survival compared to the emergency group. The disease recurrence rate was comparable in both groups, mainly in the first two years after curative resection.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...